....

[gorehound]

I enjoy the current format. Would need to know a lot more about advancements, relegations in each league before wanting to change this format...

[Darin44]

I voted no

If yes win I resign

[Heads or tails]

I voted no

[thelord]

I vote yes. And go for it from start of next year. 1 more season of current format. And while I'm here a change of map for next season please - New york 1695..

[heatz]

Voted yes and end of this season

[LFAW]

I voted no

[chesspi64]

I voted YES, being in the lower leagues we get more KICKED players than REST players, and it really reduces the games down if you haven't played any matchups yet against the kicked folks. More people in leagues would reduce the reduction when that happens.

[Wile E Coyote]

Voted.... Yes from me!

[Yeti Discovered]

I think eventually this will need to happen anyways as more and more people join. It also takes a long time to climb up the leagues, even when winning leagues.. more players per league might solve that issue ++ yes from me

[Jimmy V]

I vote yes and think it simplifies the league.

[Craig25]

You need to tell us what you voted for so that your vote can be counted. Post Reply on the Forum for Transparency M8.

Voted and end of this season

[Craig25]

This is a BETA Map. All Beta Maps are currently BANNED.

I vote yes. And go for it from start of next year. 1 more season of current format. And while I'm here a change of map for next season please - New york 1695..

[Craig25]

Just so I understand, if Players vote to increase League Sizes to 20 Players then you resign from League? (-:

I voted no

If yes win I resign

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

show

[JPcelticfc]

I voted no

[SirLindsley]

I'm in with Waterloo.

[steenh]

Yes from me but I'd be OK either way. End of this season. Pull the bandaid off.

[GeneralAnarchy]

I'm in. Berlin 1961 is my map.

[T-Ray]

I voted no, but I'm ultimately good with either way. I voted no because I enjoy playing everyone in my league twice and becoming more familiar with those players.

[Darin44]

Just so I understand, if Players vote to increase League Sizes to 20 Players then you resign from League? (-:

I voted no

If yes win I resign

Yes that is right

[Lo Pan]

I vote yes. I like the idea of larger leagues, it makes winning a league feel like a bigger accomplishment. I know you said leagues will still only be 2 months but a switch to 3 or 4 months and could still play the current 4 home 4 away schedule.

It looks like only 50 some people (less if it’s only people who voted and commented) out of 286 voted, hard to make a large scale change off of that small of a percentage of the league voting, tho. There’s no need implement changes until fully flushed out so I would say give it time and don’t change anything until the beginning of next year.

I still think you should get first to act on your home matches, it’s home field advantage after all. But that might not even be possible without some sort backend updates.

[raderiba]

I voted yes, because I believe it is better format, despite the fact that I will have no chance of achieving record win streak…

Only problem that I see is that too few people voted, maybe we should have longer discussion….

[Lord_Bremen]

In with All Your Base Are Belong To Us please.

[Craig25]

I should have said, in 20 Player Leagues, it is an all v all 1 Match Up (4 Games) against each opponent with the Season still lasting 2 Calendar Months.

[EpixDk]

It is okay for me with a 20 players league. But I will like to see a normal promotion and regalation. So 5 five up & 5 down sounds fair. I opt in for we still play home & away it will only cost some more time every week to play.

[General Brewsie]

Craig, I see that my vote was not counted. I voted for YES, so it made no difference, but it could have done so if it had been a tie vote.

As for the person threatening to retire if he/she doesn't like the majority's decision, I am reminded of a certain president who refused to accept the majority's decision in his country's last election and the hell he continues to raise by not accepting the rules of the democracy he wishes to preside over. "The majority must conform with my desire or I won't play." I like your call, Craig: Okay, then don't play if you don't want to accept the rule that the majority decides.