Americans: What political party are you part of?

by **OnlyAmbrose** on Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:09 pm

Just out of curiosity, I'd like to see how Americans match up on CC in terms of political parties. If you put one of the "3rd party/independent" choices, please state what specifically you consider yourself

As for all of us minors, we can just put what we WOULD be if we were old enough to be registered voters.

by **cowshrptrn** on Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:18 pm

I personally am a liberal with slight socialist leanings, but i would vote democrat (my friend gives me hell for this) because they have a better chance of getting enoguh votes to get into an office and make a difference than third parties such as progressives.

by **stinkycheese** on Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:27 pm

communist?

by **vtmarik** on Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:46 pm

Non-Party Affiliated

by **Cheesemore** on Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:24 pm

I am a weird rebulican
Same Sex Marrage is ok in my book
and Abortion too (but has to be ok'd by both mom and dad)

by **reverend_kyle** on Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:03 pm

Cheesemore wrote:I am a weird rebulican
Same Sex Marrage is ok in my book
and Abortion too (but has to be ok'd by both mom and dad)

If you are republican on some other issues(like corporation rights) I'd say we got ourselves a libertarian.

by **strike wolf** on Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:26 pm

I'm neutral. Vote for candidate I think is the best and that's it.

by **happysadfun** on Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:34 pm

stinkycheese wrote:communist?

That would be democrat.

by **vtmarik** on Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:38 pm

happysadfun wrote:
stinkycheese wrote:communist?
That would be democrat.

No that would be Communist

by **reverend_kyle** on Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:38 pm

vtmarik wrote:
happysadfun wrote:
stinkycheese wrote:fascist?
That would be republican.

No that would be fascist

by **DIRESTRAITS** on Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:51 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:
vtmarik wrote:
happysadfun wrote:
stinkycheese wrote:fascist?
That would be republican.

No that would be fascist

Please explain this one to me

by **reverend_kyle** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 1:01 am

DIRESTRAITS wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
vtmarik wrote:
happysadfun wrote:
stinkycheese wrote:fascist?
That would be republican.

No that would be fascist

Please explain this one to me

the more radical form of democrat ideology is communist

the more radical form of republican ideology is fascist

they are both moderate forms with less bad side effects.

by **vtmarik** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 1:43 am

reverend_kyle wrote:
DIRESTRAITS wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
vtmarik wrote:
happysadfun wrote:
stinkycheese wrote:fascist?
That would be republican.

No that would be fascist

Please explain this one to me

the more radical form of democrat ideology is communist

the more radical form of republican ideology is fascist

they are both moderate forms with less bad side effects.

Actually, that isn't what I meant Kyle. Calling democracy "communism" is idiotic, since communism has a political party (CPUSA) and since democracy doesn't follow the precepts of communism.

It's just as stupid as calling republicans "fascists."

by **stinkycheese** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:01 am

Did I say communism? I meant Trotskyist Communism...not Stalinist or Maoist Communism. 8-[

by **reverend_kyle** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:02 am

vtmarik wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
DIRESTRAITS wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
vtmarik wrote:
happysadfun wrote:
stinkycheese wrote:fascist?
That would be republican.

No that would be fascist

Please explain this one to me

the more radical form of democrat ideology is communist

the more radical form of republican ideology is fascist

they are both moderate forms with less bad side effects.

Actually, that isn't what I meant Kyle. Calling democracy "communism" is idiotic, since communism has a political party (CPUSA) and since democracy doesn't follow the precepts of communism.

It's just as stupid as calling republicans "fascists."

Lemme rephrase...I was referring to happysadfun...

basically saying the same thing you did.. what I was explaining is why i chose fascist and republican.. which.. wlel..

by **stinkycheese** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:04 am

happysadfun wrote:
stinkycheese wrote:communist?
That would be democrat.

I hope you aren't serious... ](*,)

by **ksslemp** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:15 pm

vtmarik wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
DIRESTRAITS wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:
vtmarik wrote:
happysadfun wrote:
stinkycheese wrote:fascist?
That would be republican.

No that would be fascist

Please explain this one to me

the more radical form of democrat ideology is communist

the more radical form of republican ideology is fascist

they are both moderate forms with less bad side effects.

Actually, that isn't what I meant Kyle. Calling democracy "communism" is idiotic, since communism has a political party (CPUSA) and since democracy doesn't follow the precepts of communism.

It's just as stupid as calling republicans "fascists."

There is a difference between a Democrat and Democracy! It seems a lot of new Americans register to vote as Democrats because they think the party name represents democracy. not true.

by **vtmarik** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:27 pm

ksslemp wrote:There is a difference between a Democrat and Democracy! It seems a lot of new Americans register to vote as Democrats because they think the party name represents democracy. not true.

Well what's the correct term, Democratism?

Let's see, if a communist follows communism

Then a Democrat follows democram... Democrasm... Democrism...?

by **Jargo The Axe** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:34 pm

Do you mean to say "Democrapism"

jk

by **vtmarik** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:49 pm

Jargo The Axe wrote:Do you mean to say "Democrapism"

jk

Probably.

by **jay_a2j** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:56 pm

I heard something the other day. I found that it rang true...

"The US is made up of makers (Republicans) and takers (Democrats)"

by **happysadfun** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 6:00 pm

reverend_kyle wrote:the more radical form of democrat ideology is communist

the more radical form of republican ideology is fascist

they are both moderate forms with less bad side effects.

Republicans have a moderate form of nationalism. Not fascism. Although often they intertwine.

by **cowshrptrn** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 8:21 pm

jay_a2j wrote:I heard something the other day. I found that it rang true...

"The US is made up of makers (Republicans) and takers (Democrats)"

i heard something as well, the US is made up of Evangelicals who are succeptible to brives by lobbyists (republicans) and the people who acutally run a government (democrats)

Jay, your quote is SOO vague, democarts aren't "takers" and republicans aren't "makers" (if anytihng you should switch it since democrats are pro-government, and republicans are pro-loosening restrictions)

If you're claiming that its democrats who are corrupt, may i remind you of the Abramoff scandal (more republicans were involvded than democrats)

by **happysadfun** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 9:29 pm

Ah, but both were involved. We are all fallible, and each party is flawed. Each person is flawed. I just happen to be a Republican. Viva la Revolucion. Viva la Reagan!

And truth doesn't change. So why should we loosen the rules that keep the truth the same?

by **Senfive** on Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:19 pm

jay_a2j wrote:"The US is made up of makers (Republicans) and takers (Democrats)"

You know, your right!!! Bush Makes a War in IrAq we are losing and the Democrats Take back the House and Senate!!!

Americans: What political party are you part of?

What political party are you?

Americans: What political party are you part of?

Who is online