Chicago Bears...
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:11 pm...8 and 1, baby!
'nuff said...
'nuff said...
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://rc.conquerclub.com/forum/
Chicago Bears...
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:11 pmPosted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:27 pmGrossman will choke when the playoffs come. The eagles will make the playoffs and McNabb and Westbrook will own...
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 1:28 pmJim McMahon (sp?) was my favorite qb of all time....loved his style.....hellova turnaround against the giants....good game.
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:44 pmthe Bearsh are lookin good.......but i still think that a.) the Sea Chickens have a chance b.)the Saints or Eagles, maybe the Bearsh will own
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:59 pmP Gizzle wrote:the Bearsh are lookin good.......but i still think that a.) the Sea Chickens have a chance b.)the Saints or Eagles, maybe the Bearsh will own
thats right the saints will make it
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:04 pmP Gizzle wrote:the Bearsh are lookin good.......but i still think that a.) the Sea Chickens have a chance b.)the Saints or Eagles, maybe the Bearsh will own
whaaat? mention the eagles but not the cowboys?
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:05 pmyeah TO will drive them right to the ground
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:07 pmP Gizzle wrote:yeah TO will drive them right to the ground
haha eagles beat cowboys because T.O sucks
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:10 pmtoo bad the saints lost to the steelers and bush is yet to rush for over 70 yards in a game. and they suck
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:12 pmand that is why they are 6-3 and cowboys are 5-4? haha..
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:12 pmbush hasnt done cuz they use mcalister more
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:13 pmP Gizzle wrote:bush hasnt done cuz they use mcalister more
exactly
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:46 pmlooking pretty good this year, but remember what happened to them last year in the playoffs. Even though they have looked terrible, the Panthers are a second half team. Watch oit.
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:47 pmOUT
Re: Chicago Bears...
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:50 pmspring1 wrote:...8 and 1, baby!
'nuff said...
Yeah and my Dolphins are responcible for the "1". nuff said!
Re: Chicago Bears...
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:56 pmjay_a2j wrote:spring1 wrote:...8 and 1, baby!
'nuff said...
Yeah and my Dolphins are responcible for the "1". nuff said!
lol!!! my friend (A Dolphins fan) was excited to hear about that!!! as he would say, "we would have won by even more if we had Dan Marino still". the hawks are down but not out. (6-3 with a crippled team)
Re: Chicago Bears...
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:28 pmP Gizzle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:spring1 wrote:...8 and 1, baby!
'nuff said...
Yeah and my Dolphins are responcible for the "1". nuff said!
lol!!! my friend (A Dolphins fan) was excited to hear about that!!! as he would say, "we would have won by even more if we had Dan Marino still". the hawks are down but not out. (6-3 with a crippled team)
6-3 in a crappy division.
and Bush will never be an everyback down, that was my point before
Re: Chicago Bears...
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:57 pmdcowboys055 wrote:P Gizzle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:spring1 wrote:...8 and 1, baby!
'nuff said...
Yeah and my Dolphins are responcible for the "1". nuff said!
lol!!! my friend (A Dolphins fan) was excited to hear about that!!! as he would say, "we would have won by even more if we had Dan Marino still". the hawks are down but not out. (6-3 with a crippled team)
6-3 in a crappy division.
and Bush will never be an everyback down, that was my point before
true, we're in a crappy division, but so are the Bears......
and i believe the term is every down back.....and bush will be, because he will adapt.....trust me on this one, people were made to adapt
Re: Chicago Bears...
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:12 pmP Gizzle wrote:dcowboys055 wrote:P Gizzle wrote:jay_a2j wrote:spring1 wrote:...8 and 1, baby!
'nuff said...
Yeah and my Dolphins are responcible for the "1". nuff said!
lol!!! my friend (A Dolphins fan) was excited to hear about that!!! as he would say, "we would have won by even more if we had Dan Marino still". the hawks are down but not out. (6-3 with a crippled team)
6-3 in a crappy division.
and Bush will never be an everyback down, that was my point before
true, we're in a crappy division, but so are the Bears......
and i believe the term is every down back.....and bush will be, because he will adapt.....trust me on this one, people were made to adapt
lol, yes my bad every down back. and no he wont beacuse he returns kicks, splits out as a receiver often, AND runs the ball.
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 5:46 pmhe won't return once he's a starter and he won't be a wide out either, not unless he can balance both. troy brown, and champ bailey play both sides of the ball....
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:45 pmP Gizzle wrote:he won't return once he's a starter and he won't be a wide out either
i dont know about that, thats a huge reason he was so hyped. and if he does stop doing those two, thats taking away a lot of his talents, and hurting the saints
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:31 pmnot really, anyone can have a good returner, and he might be able to line up WR, if he wants too.
look at my examples in my previous post
look at my examples in my previous post
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 8:55 pmGO DOLPHINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Good Ole' Rexy Sucked Taylor Off after that game.lol.
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:11 pmGo Falcons! I don't care if they did lose to the Browns.....And the lions Im still rootin' for 'em
As long as they don't lose this week.
As long as they don't lose this week.
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:27 pmthis week for me is a must win.....my friend is a huge 49ers fan!!!! so, if the hawks lose, he'll be a sore winner like he always is. he goes out of his way to bug me. we better win, and they i'll never let him let it down