Conquer Club

wuts ur say? since some posters r gettin political

I think that the entire system of parties is jsut bad, because it forces people to vote for a party not a candidate. It becomes a battle between parties, and there is far too much compromising of beliefs. Generally when you have parties it forces people to ignore the issues to some extent and jsut vote along party lines. I voted for multy party is best simply because if you having lots of parties is better than having one, giving people more freedom to choose.
If you can't tell I'm not too fond of my government.....

I think democracy sucks a lot!! Politics dont govern, they only buy the people votes.

hoorray for dictatorship!

Only a wise despot is in the position to govern correctly a country...

but then you get the unwise despot, like me

Burn down the farms! Burn them all Mouahahahahahah!

Multi-parties work better in the parliamentary style that Great Britian uses. Their executives are just the representative of a coalition of parties and can get voted out at anytime. They also have the clause where in times of emergency their powers are enhanced significantly. But then you get the Roman feel where in session everyone just yells at one another

Multi-party systems are better because they provide the organization that is lacking in a pure democracy and they negate the harmful abuses of power that occur in single party governments.

what a wonderful thread to revisit!!!!

Marvaddin wrote:I think democracy sucks a lot!! Politics dont govern, they only buy the people votes.

Interesting perspective, and what type of government do they have in brazil.