Page 1 of 3

Who WIll Win The English Footie Premiership 06/07?

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:55 pm
by lozzini
So... who do you think will win the premiership? 06/07


Allthough i support Arsenal, i do think United will win :( it pains me to say it :(

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 4:58 pm
by stinkycheese
Man City. Hehehe

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:17 pm
by panicker
lol @ Newcastle being in the poll

and that's from a die-hard mag :shock:

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 6:02 pm
by edmundomcpot
Man U there consistancy this season has been amazing so far, aslong as they dont buckle at anfield and stamford bridge it be easy

PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 7:50 pm
by reverend_kyle
Manchester Utd. because they are owned by malcolm glazer.

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 12:53 pm
by Phobia
I thought Watford but then I changed my mind and went for Charlton instead ;)

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:22 pm
by Backglass
panicker wrote:lol @ Newcastle being in the poll


I have no idea what this is all about, but I do know I love Newcastle. The beer that is. ;)

Image

PostPosted: Thu Jan 25, 2007 1:23 pm
by Master Bush
lozzini, do you see my Arsenal team I started in that Premiership tournament. Suprised you didn't wanna join my team.

PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 11:58 am
by lozzini
Master Bush wrote:lozzini, do you see my Arsenal team I started in that Premiership tournament. Suprised you didn't wanna join my team.


wot r u talking about

PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:59 pm
by Titanic
Its Man U's for the taking now. They have to slip up to lose it.

Man U

PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 8:45 am
by fazisso
It'll go to Man United just because they have a super Ronaldo

PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 8:58 am
by boogiesadda
Backglass wrote:
panicker wrote:lol @ Newcastle being in the poll


I have no idea what this is all about, but I do know I love Newcastle. The beer that is. ;)

Image



Its that boring sport that we call soccer because it wasnt cool enough to be called Football :lol:

PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 5:09 pm
by DAZMCFC
i am happy city has 2 votes and not 1 from me. i am hoping arsenal only because i hav 4 of them in my fantasy football team, and if they do well i will do well.

PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:56 pm
by P Gizzle
DAZMCFC wrote:i am happy city has 2 votes and not 1 from me. i am hoping arsenal only because i hav 4 of them in my fantasy football team, and if they do well i will do well.


and it will please "the boss" :wink:

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 12:02 am
by Jamie
I hate Soccer. The fields too big, the scores are too low, they take away the most athletic talented part of a persons body, (Hands). Indoor soccoer is far more exciting, and even that is just plain retarded. I love football, but if the average score was 7-3 or something, I'd hate that as much. When Soccer fans watch their favorite team score a goal they nearly have a orgasm. There is something wrong witha sport when 2-0 is a blowout. I truly gave up when the US lost an extra time game 1-0 to Mexico, and it was said how much the US was dominated, and never had a chance, a blowout of monumental proportions. HELLO Morons, it was 1-0. That's awfully damn close. You can't get closer. A blowout is like 10-0, not 1-0, or 2-0. Wake up and realize it's what's on the scoreboard that matters, not the plays on the field. I watched my favorite NFL football team win 35-30. They absolutley dominated the game, but barely won, so, no, they didn't kill the other team. Baltimore gave up only 27 yards of total offense to the Houston Texans, and still lost 24-7 thanks to 3 turnovers returned for touchdowns. That 27 yards was a 60 year low for yards given up, and almost an NFL record, maybe one of the top five best defensive shows in NFL history, but they still LOST the game. So any sport that calls a 1-0 blowout is just plain stupid. That and it's boring as hell to watch. Don't mind playing it, but I'd sooner watch grass grow than watch a soccer game. 3 Hours to see one, and if I'm lucky two whole goals.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:22 am
by edmundomcpot
Jamie wrote:I hate Soccer. The fields too big, the scores are too low, they take away the most athletic talented part of a persons body, (Hands). Indoor soccoer is far more exciting, and even that is just plain retarded. I love football, but if the average score was 7-3 or something, I'd hate that as much. When Soccer fans watch their favorite team score a goal they nearly have a orgasm. There is something wrong witha sport when 2-0 is a blowout. I truly gave up when the US lost an extra time game 1-0 to Mexico, and it was said how much the US was dominated, and never had a chance, a blowout of monumental proportions. HELLO Morons, it was 1-0. That's awfully damn close. You can't get closer. A blowout is like 10-0, not 1-0, or 2-0. Wake up and realize it's what's on the scoreboard that matters, not the plays on the field. I watched my favorite NFL football team win 35-30. They absolutley dominated the game, but barely won, so, no, they didn't kill the other team. Baltimore gave up only 27 yards of total offense to the Houston Texans, and still lost 24-7 thanks to 3 turnovers returned for touchdowns. That 27 yards was a 60 year low for yards given up, and almost an NFL record, maybe one of the top five best defensive shows in NFL history, but they still LOST the game. So any sport that calls a 1-0 blowout is just plain stupid. That and it's boring as hell to watch. Don't mind playing it, but I'd sooner watch grass grow than watch a soccer game. 3 Hours to see one, and if I'm lucky two whole goals.


when the pundits said they were blown out or whatever they were probably lookiung at all the stats. How many shots they had on goal/on target. successful passes.

low scoring makes the game more tense you never know if your team is acctually going to score. in NFL your almost guarennteed to score and it becomes less special.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:55 am
by Jamie
Ok, so if France shoots the ball 74 times, and don't make a single goal, and they are playing Germany who Shoots it one time, and it goes in, Germany has won 1-0, but people would still speak as if France had won. That's stupid, the scoreboard is the only thing that matters. 1-0 is a close game no matter how many shots were taken. Soccer is boring to watch, because of the lack of goals. True it makes the goals more exciting, but soccer will never succeed in the US so long as scoring remains in the 1-0, 2-1 range.
Football is high scoring because TD's are worth 7pts, FG's wort 3, and so on. Soccer goals are worth 1 no matter what. If they had lines that made goals worth a certain amount, it would be far more interesting. Imagine 1-2-3-4-5 point kicking lines. You'd never be out of a game, and scoring would be increased, without changing the size of the field or goal. If TD's in Football were worth 1 pt, and FG's didn't exist, no one would watch. Soccer would get a big boost world wide if there were different ways to score, and ways to score more.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:19 am
by lozzini
Jamie wrote:I hate Soccer. Wake up and realize it's what's on the scoreboard that matters, not the plays on the field.


So your saying it doesn't matter how enjoyable the sport is, its just whether your team wins and whether the score was high. 'Soccer' is a tactical game, and is at it's best when at end to end football, regardless whether the ball goes in if the keeper saves it it;s just as enjoyable.

sad

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:19 am
by Phobia
well, either way i seriously doubt they would change the whole concept of football for americans sake, so either like it or dont like it :P 8)

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:21 am
by edmundomcpot
no they would say Germany had an undeserved win

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:32 am
by Jamie
I love baseball, and I don't mind a 1-0 baseball game, but not almost every freakin time. I wouldn't want to see 12-10 baseball games all the tike either, cause that's just bad baseball. I would just like to see a little variety to the scores, and action. I could watch 10 soccer games, and they'd all look pretty much the same. Same scores, same strategy. In Baseball, Football, almost anyother sport but Soccer, the scores vary wildly, and you never know what you are going to get. Even upsets. In Soccer, it's nearly a given who will win. The US isn't going to beat Brazil, so what's the point in the game. The score will be 1-0, or 2-0, maybe 2-1, but no matter what, it will be Brazil who scores the extra goal. Soccer is just to predictable, and taking away the use of hands in a sport is just plain dumb. They should at least make it so that you can swat the ball with your hands, as long as you make no attempt to grab it.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 5:35 am
by edmundomcpot
F.A cup holders knocked out on the first hurdle. That was predictable :roll:

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 6:50 am
by Titanic
So Jamie, if every goal was suddenly worth 10 points rather then 1, so most matches finished about 20-0 and 20-10 it would suddenly be more enjoyable? Thats crap. It the game that makes football enjoyable, not the score.

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:15 am
by Phobia
edmundomcpot wrote:F.A cup holders knocked out on the first hurdle. That was predictable :roll:


yes, i have to agree football can be unpredictable. southend beating man utd in the league cup? swansea beating sheffield utd? you probably dont know what im talking about but anyway, there are lots of upsets.

we are not exactly forcing you to watch football, so dont if you dont like it :P

Man Utd for the title

PostPosted: Sun Jan 28, 2007 9:52 am
by Blumoki
I have travelled all over the world watching Football, it is a great sport with may differing levels,

You americans will only be in to it when you start challenging for the top spot.

It hurts me to say that we are likley to see the best footballers ever coming out of the US soon, it will be the next big explosion in the US.

Glazier and Randy cant be wrong......

I also feel that the LA Galaxy will sell more Football shirts next year, than they have ever sold in combined years.