Conquer Club

what does that have to do with bush?

uh...hm...

Master Bush wrote:what does that have to do with bush?

Wow Master. I always knew you were slow but now I think you need to start wearing that safety helmet your parents bought you.

Senfive wrote:

Master Bush wrote:what does that have to do with bush?

Wow Master. I always knew you were slow but now I think you need to start wearing that safety helmet your parents bought you.

Maybe we should look in the mirror and really think about who's the slow one in this thread.

Master Bush wrote:what does that have to do with bush?

Umm, like everything. Maybe you have a different link

supercram wrote:http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20670001&refer=&sid=a.aveoiqdgBU

And you were expecting Bush to have a 90% approval rating after 6 years of being bashed by the loony left and the liberal media? I'm surprised he's even on the radar. Does that mean he is a bad president? No. Just like Clinton's approval rating didn't make him a good president.

you're right. it's the MEDIA's fault that bush is an idiot.

silly giraffe.

Master Bush wrote:what does that have to do with bush?

Pussy thread>>

reverend_kyle wrote: Pussy thread>>

agreed

pussy bush anyone?

MeDeFe wrote:pussy bush anyone?

Now thats something I'm interested in.

jay_a2j wrote:

supercram wrote:http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20670001&refer=&sid=a.aveoiqdgBU

And you were expecting Bush to have a 90% approval rating after 6 years of being bashed by the loony left and the liberal media? I'm surprised he's even on the radar. Does that mean he is a bad president?

Well, yes, it does. I'm surprised you think a bunch of loonies, pinkos and commies could have such a massive effect on Dubya's popularity. Either the loonies are actually in charge or bush is more useless than anyone thought.

heavycola wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:

supercram wrote:http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20670001&refer=&sid=a.aveoiqdgBU

And you were expecting Bush to have a 90% approval rating after 6 years of being bashed by the loony left and the liberal media? I'm surprised he's even on the radar. Does that mean he is a bad president?

Well, yes, it does. I'm surprised you think a bunch of loonies, pinkos and commies could have such a massive effect on Dubya's popularity. Either the loonies are actually in charge or bush is more useless than anyone thought.

Hmmm if memory serves me well Bush was re-elected. Therefore the majority of voters (dare I say Americans) wanted to KEEP him in office.

jay_a2j wrote:

heavycola wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:

supercram wrote:http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20670001&refer=&sid=a.aveoiqdgBU

And you were expecting Bush to have a 90% approval rating after 6 years of being bashed by the loony left and the liberal media? I'm surprised he's even on the radar. Does that mean he is a bad president?

Well, yes, it does. I'm surprised you think a bunch of loonies, pinkos and commies could have such a massive effect on Dubya's popularity. Either the loonies are actually in charge or bush is more useless than anyone thought.

Hmmm if memory serves me well Bush was re-elected. Therefore the majority of voters (dare I say Americans) wanted to KEEP him in office.

Hence the saying: "You are as wise as the majority of American voters".

jay_a2j wrote:Hmmm if memory serves me well Bush was re-elected. Therefore the majority of voters (dare I say Americans) wanted to KEEP him in office.

Unfortuantely that is very true. However, if he hadnt been re-elected, British satirical TV programmes would lose their main cannon fodder. But I guess at least Bush is just stupid, unlike Blair, who is untrustworthy.

Bush fans-

http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=B39klu3egan1k

jay_a2j wrote:And you were expecting Bush to have a 90% approval rating after 6 years of being bashed by the loony left and the liberal media?

So you are saying the majority of Conservative Republicans are easily swayed lemmings? How else can you explain the mass defection?

jay_a2j wrote:Does that mean he is a bad president?

Well, since a President's report card is the opinionof The American People...I would say "Yes" he is.

jay_a2j wrote:Just like Clinton's approval rating didn't make him a good president.

Hmmm, lets see. No wars, huge economic growth, lowest unemployment in 30 years, lowest inflation since the 60's, highest home ownership on record, dramatically lowered deficit...Yup. He was awful.

jay_a2j wrote:

heavycola wrote:

jay_a2j wrote:

supercram wrote:http://quote.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20670001&refer=&sid=a.aveoiqdgBU

And you were expecting Bush to have a 90% approval rating after 6 years of being bashed by the loony left and the liberal media? I'm surprised he's even on the radar. Does that mean he is a bad president?

Well, yes, it does. I'm surprised you think a bunch of loonies, pinkos and commies could have such a massive effect on Dubya's popularity. Either the loonies are actually in charge or bush is more useless than anyone thought.

Hmmm if memory serves me well Bush was re-elected. Therefore the majority of voters (dare I say Americans) wanted to KEEP him in office.

Well at least he didn't have to cheat his way in the second time, that's true. it was also 2 and a half years ago. He's squandered most of that support since then (dare i say thinking people), apparently

Backglass wrote:Hmmm, lets see. No wars, huge economic growth, lowest unemployment in 30 years, lowest inflation since the 60's, highest home ownership on record, dramatically lowered deficit...Yup. He was awful.

Usually, I'm on your side, Backglass...this case being the first exception..
Now, I'm far from a Bush fan, but in my opinion, Clinton's only success was having enough charm to sway the idiot masses away from his many failures...indulge me, if you have the time--how exactly did Clinton spur huge economic growth? What did he definitively do to ensure that inflation was low and that home ownership would be at its pinnacle? From my end of the spectrum, he was simply in the right place at the right time. Let's see...Los Alamos...now there was something to be proud of (notice how little was made of this astronomically huge event)...convenient how the investigation into that little alleged debacle he had--you know--taking campaign contributions from a foreign government (China) never truly came to fruition...hey..ever look at who exactly he pardoned in the last few months of his presidency? What a generous guy...No, you're right--Clinton was a man's man...one hell of a President--at least according to the ridiculously low standards that we, for some unknown reason, seem to be content with today...If you get time, Backglass, we can even discuss how Clinton's Presidency directly affected our military's ability to prepare for war--I suppose that given his cowardice in past wars, we should expect no less...but still...

spring1 wrote:how exactly did Clinton spur huge economic growth? What did he definitively do to ensure that inflation was low and that home ownership would be at its pinnacle? From my end of the spectrum, he was simply in the right place at the right time.

And it seems that Bush is in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Backglass wrote:

spring1 wrote:how exactly did Clinton spur huge economic growth? What did he definitively do to ensure that inflation was low and that home ownership would be at its pinnacle? From my end of the spectrum, he was simply in the right place at the right time.

And it seems that Bush is in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Lets see... the economy is still chugging along. Lets not forget the Republican takeover of the House and Senate in 1994 (wonder if that had anything to to with "Clinton's economy"). Now that the Dem's are in control of the House and Senate, look for the economy to collapse under the weight of higher taxes.

supercram wrote:you're right. it's the MEDIA's fault that bush is an idiot.

silly giraffe.

Its all popular opinion, obviosly, some people dont like him. obviously, due to the past 2 elections some do. i never belly-ached about clinton when he was in office, and dont see why people gotta bash bush all the time. i mean, really, is your life so horrible, that you gotta rip on him? please, explain what he has done to get (you) all upset.

Master Bush wrote:what does that have to do with bush?

there is 12 times bush standing in that text

Knight of Orient wrote:

supercram wrote:you're right. it's the MEDIA's fault that bush is an idiot.

silly giraffe.

Its all popular opinion, obviosly, some people dont like him. obviously, due to the past 2 elections some do. i never belly-ached about clinton when he was in office, and dont see why people gotta bash bush all the time. i mean, really, is your life so horrible, that you gotta rip on him? please, explain what he has done to get (you) all upset.

Increased the risk of me getting blown up on a bus or tube by a fairly significant degree.