Moderator: Community Team
Pack Rat wrote:Things are so bad that the Stock Market reaches new highs!
HitRed wrote:Pack Rat wrote:Things are so bad that the Stock Market reaches new highs!
That happens before a recession.
Pack Rat wrote:HitRed wrote:Pack Rat wrote:Things are so bad that the Stock Market reaches new highs!
That happens before a recession.
You know what happens, if Trump wins?
pmac666 wrote:Theres something in motion you cannot comprehend. Cant wait for the tears tho.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=237819&p=5341485#p5341483
saxitoxin wrote:CBS News revealed today that the dying president met with a Parkinson's disease specialist multiple times. The White House, citing "national security," refused to comment on the prognosis or the dying president's hospice plans. Will, for instance, he retain nuclear command authority if he goes on morphine as part of end of life care?
Pack Rat wrote:saxitoxin wrote:CBS News revealed today that the dying president met with a Parkinson's disease specialist multiple times. The White House, citing "national security," refused to comment on the prognosis or the dying president's hospice plans. Will, for instance, he retain nuclear command authority if he goes on morphine as part of end of life care?
Who is traveling and making appearances/speeches in July?
Trump - 0
Biden - 10
pmac666 wrote:Theres something in motion you cannot comprehend. Cant wait for the tears tho.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=237819&p=5341485#p5341483
pmac666 wrote:Theres something in motion you cannot comprehend. Cant wait for the tears tho.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=237819&p=5341485#p5341483
saxitoxin wrote:Pack Rat wrote:saxitoxin wrote:CBS News revealed today that the dying president met with a Parkinson's disease specialist multiple times. The White House, citing "national security," refused to comment on the prognosis or the dying president's hospice plans. Will, for instance, he retain nuclear command authority if he goes on morphine as part of end of life care?
Who is traveling and making appearances/speeches in July?
Trump - 0
Biden - 10
LOL, I literally just posted two speeches Trump made last week and two he's making this week. And that's just the tip. But, sure, I can make-up numbers too!
Democratic U.S. Senator Michael Bennet from Colorado told CNN on Tuesday he thinks Democratic U.S. President Joe Biden cannot win against former Republican President Donald Trump in the November 2024 elections. "Donald Trump is on track I think to win this election, and maybe win it by a landslide and take with it the Senate and the House," Bennet said in an interview on CNN.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/democratic-u ... 12783.html
pmac666 wrote:Theres something in motion you cannot comprehend. Cant wait for the tears tho.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=237819&p=5341485#p5341483
Opinion | The Bitter Biden Reality Sinks In
We read the Democratic press so you don’t have to, and these days the anguish on the left is palpable. The political reality of the party’s predicament in covering for President Biden’s infirmities for so long is finally sinking in. Could it be that Democrats will end up re-electing Donald J. Trump? Yes it could.
Thursday evening’s press conference was a microcosm of their self-induced peril. The President showed no sign of political retreat, or introspection, and he was just coherent enough to prevent a wholesale flight from his candidacy. Yet he lost his train of thought numerous times, bailing out of sentence after sentence with his now trademark “anyway.” We counted 10.
While Mr. Biden may make it through a particular event, Democrats can have no confidence he won’t have another debate-like meltdown between now and November. As Democratic Rep. Jim Himes put in on CNN in explaining his call for Mr. Biden to step aside:
“Imagine that three months from now we get another performance like there was in the debate, right before the election. Do you want to take that risk? I don’t.”
More important for the country—and more damning for the Democrats—Mr. Biden gave the appearance of an old and enfeebled man who has no chance of meeting the demands of the Presidency for another four years. If Democrats are honest, they know America’s adversaries are savoring the prospect of Biden II.
falling re-election prospects. Democratic election analyst Doug Sosnik usually surfaces every four years to assure Democrats they’re going to win. But this week he showed up in the New York Times to say Mr. Biden has only a single, narrow path to victory in the Electoral College.
Mr. Biden must sweep all of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, where he now trails. And he must beat off Mr. Trump’s challenge in states that Republicans haven’t won in years but are now in play—New Hampshire, Minnesota, New Mexico, Maine and Virginia. The Times now wants Mr. Biden to withdraw from the race, so the timing of Mr. Sosnik’s analysis is no accident.
riskllama wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:jonesthecurl wrote:Surely if Trump never concedes he lost in 2020, he can't run for a third term?
Jonesy wins the thread llama?
LOL, yes - yes he does.
Biden has vowed to stay in the race and Harris has made it clear that she fully supports him. However, if Biden were to step down from the race, here's what voters in three crucial swing states think of a potential Harris presidency, according to recent polling.
Michigan
A Morning Consult/Bloomberg News poll conducted from July 1 to 5 of 694 registered voters in the state revealed that a majority of participants have an unfavorable view of Harris and oppose her replacing Biden on the ticket.
Regarding her favorability, 42 percent said they had a very unfavorable view of her, with 10 percent saying they had a somewhat unfavorable view. On the other hand, 24 percent indicated they had a very favorable view of her, with 19 percent saying that they had a somewhat favorable view.
The poll also found that 40 percent of voters strongly opposed her replacing Biden on the ticket, with 10 percent somewhat opposing. Meanwhile, 24 percent said they strongly support the move while 19 percent said they somewhat support it. (...)
Pennsylvania
A Morning Consult/Bloomberg News poll of 794 registered voters in Pennsylvania, conducted from July 1 to 4, found that the majority of participants have an unfavorable opinion of Harris, don't trust her to fulfill the duties of the presidency, and don't support her being on the ticket instead of Biden. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percent.
Specifically, 45 percent hold a very unfavorable opinion of Harris, with 10 percent having a somewhat unfavorable opinion of her. On the favorable side, 19 percent find her very favorable while 23 percent said she was somewhat favorable.
When asked about their trust in Harris to carry out the presidency if Biden was unable to do so, the majority were skeptical, with 42 percent saying not at all and 12 percent indicating not much trust. Meanwhile, 24 percent said they had a lot of trust in her abilities and 19 percent said they had some trust. (...)
Wisconsin
In Wisconsin, a Morning Consult/Bloomberg News survey of 695 registered voters found that the majority do not have a favorable impression of Harris and don't trust her to assume the responsibilities of the presidency.
Specifically, 39 percent have a very unfavorable opinion of her and 14 percent said they had a somewhat unfavorable view of her. Meanwhile, 16 percent find her very favorable and 24 percent said they found her somewhat favorable.
If Biden were unable to fulfill his presidential duties, the survey asked how much they would trust Harris to carry them out. Forty-one percent said not at all, 11 percent said not much, 24 percent said they had a lot of trust and 20 percent said somewhat.
it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye
Votanic wrote:Biden quoted, 5 days ago.it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/07/08/congress/defiant-biden-tells-donors-were-done-with-the-debate-00166834
jusplay4fun wrote:Votanic wrote:Biden quoted, 5 days ago.it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/07/08/congress/defiant-biden-tells-donors-were-done-with-the-debate-00166834
Show me the Bull's eye quote in your source. I cannot find it.
Votanic wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Votanic wrote:Biden quoted, 5 days ago.it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/07/08/congress/defiant-biden-tells-donors-were-done-with-the-debate-00166834
Show me the Bull's eye quote in your source. I cannot find it.
Third paragraph down.
jusplay4fun wrote:Votanic wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Votanic wrote:Biden quoted, 5 days ago.it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/07/08/congress/defiant-biden-tells-donors-were-done-with-the-debate-00166834
Show me the Bull's eye quote in your source. I cannot find it.
Third paragraph down.
Thanks for that; I did not see it.
So that was "stated" in a PRIVATE phone call and told by an anonymous source. That is ALMOST as good as Twitter/X.
I really doubt the shooter (of Trump's ear) had read that.
The first shooting of a U.S. president or major party candidate since a 1981 assassination attempt on Republican President Ronald Reagan could upend the Nov. 5 rematch between Republican Trump and President Joe Biden, a Democrat, which has been tight in opinion polls.
“From memory, Reagan went up 22 points in the polls after his assassination attempt. The election is likely to be a landslide. This probably reduces uncertainty,” said Nick Ferres, chief investment officer at Vantage Point Asset Management.
World leaders and U.S. politicians condemned the shooting, while some industry executives, including Tesla chief Elon Musk, declared their support for Trump.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/14/trump-v ... s-say.html
pmac666 wrote:Theres something in motion you cannot comprehend. Cant wait for the tears tho.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=237819&p=5341485#p5341483
Votanic wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Votanic wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Votanic wrote:Biden quoted, 5 days ago.it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/07/08/congress/defiant-biden-tells-donors-were-done-with-the-debate-00166834
Show me the Bull's eye quote in your source. I cannot find it.
Third paragraph down.
Thanks for that; I did not see it.
So that was "stated" in a PRIVATE phone call and told by an anonymous source. That is ALMOST as good as Twitter/X.
I really doubt the shooter (of Trump's ear) had read that.
How dumb can you be?
That's just one more piece of recent evidence showing the extremism of Biden/Dem rhetoric.
It doesn't have to be a direct link to the shooter.
jusplay4fun wrote:Votanic wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Votanic wrote:Biden quoted, 5 days ago.it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/07/08/congress/defiant-biden-tells-donors-were-done-with-the-debate-00166834
Third paragraph down.
Thanks for that; I did not see it.
So that was "stated" in a PRIVATE phone call and told by an anonymous source. That is ALMOST as good as Twitter/X.
I really doubt the shooter (of Trump's ear) had read that.
Yo, doofus, that wasn't a quote from a Biden supporter, ...that was a quote from Biden himself!!!
How dumb can you be?
That's just one more piece of recent evidence showing the extremism of Biden/Dem rhetoric.
It doesn't have to be a direct link to the shooter.
And SOME of the Trump supporters are NOT that crazy? You, sir, have a BIASED view of the world.
Votanic wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Votanic wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:Votanic wrote:Biden quoted, 5 days ago.it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2024/07/08/congress/defiant-biden-tells-donors-were-done-with-the-debate-00166834
Third paragraph down.
Thanks for that; I did not see it.
So that was "stated" in a PRIVATE phone call and told by an anonymous source. That is ALMOST as good as Twitter/X.
I really doubt the shooter (of Trump's ear) had read that.
Yo, doofus, that wasn't a quote from a Biden supporter, ...that was a quote from Biden himself!!!
How dumb can you be?
That's just one more piece of recent evidence showing the extremism of Biden/Dem rhetoric.
It doesn't have to be a direct link to the shooter.
And SOME of the Trump supporters are NOT that crazy? You, sir, have a BIASED view of the world.
Don't be silly, jus, ...and/or intentionally misleading.
That wasn't a quote from a Biden supporter, ...that was a quote from Biden himself!!!
jusplay4fun wrote:both right and left wing extremists are turning up the negative and divisive rhetoric
pmac666 wrote:Theres something in motion you cannot comprehend. Cant wait for the tears tho.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=237819&p=5341485#p5341483
saxitoxin wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:both right and left wing extremists are turning up the negative and divisive rhetoric
You're WRONG you condescending jackass. There hasn't been a single fucking piece of divisive rhetoric out of my mouth. Suck a dick, commie.
Return to Out, out, brief candle!
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee