Conquer Club

lol, Bush fans

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby kclborat on Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:13 pm

Jay, im surprised that I agree with you on anything, but I agree with you about NAFTA. However, i disagree with every single other statement you have made. How can you blame the "liberal media" for everything? "They have a massive plot to undermine our conservative president and kill our country". AWHA?!
Most points: 1606
User avatar
Private 1st Class kclborat
 
Posts: 367
Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:40 pm
Location: Washington

Postby cowshrptrn on Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:16 pm

The fact that you can go on and on about the liberal media when theres Fox News with Bill O'Reilly who does nothing but badmouth liberals while claiming to be neutral shows how out of touch you are with the rest of the world and how easily you swallow this bullshit.
Image
User avatar
Private cowshrptrn
 
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 1:15 pm
Location: wouldn't YOU like to know....

Postby jay_a2j on Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:39 am

reverend_kyle wrote:Cojones came from a foreign word you dumbass.



As do MOST words idiot. :roll:
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

JESUS SAVES!!!
User avatar
Lieutenant jay_a2j
 
Posts: 4293
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 1:22 am
Location: In the center of the R3VOJUTION!

Postby reverend_kyle on Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:55 am

jay_a2j wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:Cojones came from a foreign word you dumbass.



As do MOST words idiot. :roll:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cojones


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kahuna


there is why you are an idiot, oh and btw, spell check is english unless you have it set otherwise.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
User avatar
Sergeant reverend_kyle
 
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
Location: 1000 post club

Postby mandalorian2298 on Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:10 am

DIRESTRAITS wrote:how has Bush made terrorists attacks more likely?


By ordering them? I mean isn't it a BIT suspicius to you how Al Quaida threats allways come when Bush is loosing support. Remember during the last ellections, when Bushes popularity sliped, there came the tape of Osama (who is an ex(?)-CIA cooperant) threatening Americans if they vote for Bush. Now, when everyone (sane) in USA, including a good part of the Republican Party, is against sending adittional troops to Iraq; NOW Al Quaida feels the need to send another taunting and treathening tape.

It all reminds me how we used to manipulate dumb kids, back in pre-school. :twisted: I just hope at least those kids became a little smarter [-o<
Mishuk gotal'u meshuroke, pako kyore.

Image

Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
User avatar
Lieutenant mandalorian2298
 
Posts: 4536
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: www.chess.com

Postby reverend_kyle on Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:23 am

kclborat wrote:Jay, im surprised that I agree with you on anything, but I agree with you about NAFTA.



I agree, free trade is awful for our country.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
User avatar
Sergeant reverend_kyle
 
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
Location: 1000 post club

Postby khazalid on Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:32 am

its startling how pathetically stupid you guys are. im half expecting this thread to be locked to anyone above 600 points
Lieutenant khazalid
 
Posts: 3413
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:39 am
Location: scotland

Postby Mirak on Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:15 am

khazalid wrote:its startling how pathetically stupid you guys are. im half expecting this thread to be locked to anyone above 600 points


You'll get used to it after some time...

BTW I was born in Brighton
User avatar
Captain Mirak
 
Posts: 225
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 4:00 pm
Location: Dubai, UAE

Postby vtmarik on Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:24 pm

mandalorian2298 wrote:
DIRESTRAITS wrote:how has Bush made terrorists attacks more likely?


By ordering them? I mean isn't it a BIT suspicius to you how Al Quaida threats allways come when Bush is loosing support. Remember during the last ellections, when Bushes popularity sliped, there came the tape of Osama (who is an ex(?)-CIA cooperant) threatening Americans if they vote for Bush. Now, when everyone (sane) in USA, including a good part of the Republican Party, is against sending adittional troops to Iraq; NOW Al Quaida feels the need to send another taunting and treathening tape.

It all reminds me how we used to manipulate dumb kids, back in pre-school. :twisted: I just hope at least those kids became a little smarter [-o<


The only part of that particular conspiracy theory I like is that Osama Bin Laden was paid by our government for shooting down drug traffickers planes are part of our ineffective war on drugs.

It can be argued that the war on drugs caused (or at least contributed to) the war on terror, because Osama used the money from the anti-drug operations to fund the 1993 WTC bombing and 9/11
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
User avatar
Cadet vtmarik
 
Posts: 3863
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:51 am
Location: Riding on the waves of fear and loathing.

Postby Knight of Orient on Wed Jan 24, 2007 2:15 pm

vtmarik wrote:
mandalorian2298 wrote:
DIRESTRAITS wrote:how has Bush made terrorists attacks more likely?


By ordering them? I mean isn't it a BIT suspicius to you how Al Quaida threats allways come when Bush is loosing support. Remember during the last ellections, when Bushes popularity sliped, there came the tape of Osama (who is an ex(?)-CIA cooperant) threatening Americans if they vote for Bush. Now, when everyone (sane) in USA, including a good part of the Republican Party, is against sending adittional troops to Iraq; NOW Al Quaida feels the need to send another taunting and treathening tape.

It all reminds me how we used to manipulate dumb kids, back in pre-school. :twisted: I just hope at least those kids became a little smarter [-o<


The only part of that particular conspiracy theory I like is that Osama Bin Laden was paid by our government for shooting down drug traffickers planes are part of our ineffective war on drugs.

It can be argued that the war on drugs caused (or at least contributed to) the war on terror, because Osama used the money from the anti-drug operations to fund the 1993 WTC bombing and 9/11




So, Osama doesnt want Bush in office.....it makes me ponder....why does half of america agree? maybe the mongoose(bush) was uncaged on the cobra(osama)in the last2 elections, anyone ever thought of that? I think we all should think on this 4 a bit.
you are entitled to your opinion...
that doesnt mean its right
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Knight of Orient
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:09 pm
Location: The Holy Land

Postby mandalorian2298 on Wed Jan 24, 2007 3:53 pm

Knight of Orient wrote:
vtmarik wrote:
mandalorian2298 wrote:
DIRESTRAITS wrote:how has Bush made terrorists attacks more likely?


By ordering them? I mean isn't it a BIT suspicius to you how Al Quaida threats allways come when Bush is loosing support. Remember during the last ellections, when Bushes popularity sliped, there came the tape of Osama (who is an ex(?)-CIA cooperant) threatening Americans if they vote for Bush. Now, when everyone (sane) in USA, including a good part of the Republican Party, is against sending adittional troops to Iraq; NOW Al Quaida feels the need to send another taunting and treathening tape.

It all reminds me how we used to manipulate dumb kids, back in pre-school. :twisted: I just hope at least those kids became a little smarter [-o<


The only part of that particular conspiracy theory I like is that Osama Bin Laden was paid by our government for shooting down drug traffickers planes are part of our ineffective war on drugs.

It can be argued that the war on drugs caused (or at least contributed to) the war on terror, because Osama used the money from the anti-drug operations to fund the 1993 WTC bombing and 9/11




So, Osama doesnt want Bush in office.....it makes me ponder....why does half of america agree? maybe the mongoose(bush) was uncaged on the cobra(osama)in the last2 elections, anyone ever thought of that? I think we all should think on this 4 a bit.


Your mongooses Inteligence :lol: Agency paid Osama to fight for them before. Now he is the only trump Bush has left (seriusly, with Al Quaida out of the picture, there would be no reason for ANYONE to vote for the mongoose). Osama is THE ONLY true supporter that Bush has left. Had Osama not wanted Bush reelected, he wouldn't have sent that mesage in the midle of the election race in wich Bush's sole argument was: "Osama is still out there and he is a threat to the American people, whom only I can stop." For the sake of sanity why can't the people on this "strategy adoring" site just realize the effect of EVERY Al Quaida action, so far, has been: giving Bush an argument to continue his "War on Oil-being.-in-possesion-of people-who-aren't-my-partners/friends/donators" ](*,)
Mishuk gotal'u meshuroke, pako kyore.

Image

Talapus wrote:I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
User avatar
Lieutenant mandalorian2298
 
Posts: 4536
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: www.chess.com

Previous

Return to Out, out, brief candle!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap, jusplay4fun