Moderator: Community Team
Lonous wrote:The only thing that should be measured in cups, are boobs.
2dimes wrote:The glass is probably an American pint, 16 ounces.
We used to get served beer in British pints here, 20 ounces. Then the bars all swapped out their glasses for the smaller ones in a veiled price jump.
Pack Rat wrote:Damn it jusplay4MAGA, it's not a fukn cup, it's a glass. Do not screw up this intellectual thread with gibberish.
Cups are for coffee and such. Glasses are for water, beer, vodka and err bad eye sight.
Re: A cup of water
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
DirtyDishSoap wrote:I'm more concerned about you psychopaths wanting the glass/cup to be 100% full. I mean, have none of you ever tried drinking from 100% without your hand shaking everywhere?! It's impossible! And I'm not going to dip my head down like a duck. We haven't evolved millions of years just to mimic ducks with a container of water! COME ON PEOPLE!
Votanic wrote:Thank you for pointing out the fundamental difference between NORMAL and ABNORMAL 100% full cups/glasses.
Normally 100% full cups/glassesstill leave between 5-10% of the glass unfilled, just to account for such potential situatations (i.e. 'drinking') that you so eloquently have described.
Factoring in the cup/glassfullness normalacy also bolsters my claim of the OP pictured cup/glass being at least 80% full.
Unlike wookie's (mookie's?) completely preposterous and spatially incorrect estmate of 75%.
DirtyDishSoap wrote:I mean, have none of you ever tried drinking without your hand shaking everywhere?! COME ON PEOPLE!
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
jusplay4fun wrote:Pack Rat wrote:Damn it jusplay4MAGA, it's not a fukn cup, it's a glass. Do not screw up this intellectual thread with gibberish.
Cups are for coffee and such. Glasses are for water, beer, vodka and err bad eye sight.Re: A cup of water
Read the Title, p-rat. Another Fatal mistake. NO SURPRISE for me; p-rat is at it AGAIN.
So politics is NOT the ONLY thing you need to learn about.
And do you know what a molecule IS? Or scientific notation? Geeees. Guess NOT.
DirtyDishSoap wrote:BUT TRUMP WILL CALL THIS A WATER IN A CUP AND BIDEN WILL FORGET WHAT WATER IS! HURRRRR
Re: Happy Memorial Day 2024 A.D.!!!
Postby DirtyDishSoap on Tue May 28, 2024 9:17 pm
jusplay4fun wrote:
DirtyDishSoap wrote:
Jesus f*ck, it's memorial day, not debate which party you like get fucked by. Shoo SHOO!
That was yesterday; today is Tuesday.
And?
How many threads do you nerds plan on dragging your politics into?
At this point, i could start a thread about a cup of water and somehow, some way, you dorks will turn into a "HURR DA LEFT! DAAAAAH! THE RIGHT!" Pick a thread and keep it there. Good God man.
Votanic wrote:2dimes wrote:The glass is probably an American pint, 16 ounces.
We used to get served beer in British pints here, 20 ounces. Then the bars all swapped out their glasses for the smaller ones in a veiled price jump.
No, I disagree.
I believe we are looking at an entity that conforms to 'cup' in both the 'container' and 'measurement' definitions of the term.
Lonous wrote:SOME OF US PREFER THICKER BOTTOMS
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
mookiemcgee wrote:Votanic wrote:Thank you for pointing out the fundamental difference between NORMAL and ABNORMAL 100% full cups/glasses.
Normally 100% full cups/glassesstill leave between 5-10% of the glass unfilled, just to account for such potential situatations (i.e. 'drinking') that you so eloquently have described.
Factoring in the cup/glassfullness normalacy also bolsters my claim of the OP pictured cup/glass being at least 80% full.
Unlike wookie's (mookie's?) completely preposterous and spatially incorrect estmate of 75%.
uh, i don't need to leave room for cream in my water like you ladies... filler up to the brim.DirtyDishSoap wrote:I mean, have none of you ever tried drinking without your hand shaking everywhere?! COME ON PEOPLE!
More evidence it's a glass of vodka, first one of the day from the sounds of it. Try a straw until the shakes settle down?
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
Votanic wrote:Much of the rancor concerning claims that the vessel displayed in the OP is not a 'cup' si likely based on confusion between the terms 'cup' and 'mug'.
For example, many might be truly surprised to learn that their morning 'cup of coffee' is actually a mug of coffee.
While the receptacle shown can be reasonably described as a 'cup', it is indeed not a mug.
However, mugs can also be made of glass.
Pack Rat wrote:Votanic wrote:Much of the rancor concerning claims that the vessel displayed in the OP is not a 'cup' si likely based on confusion between the terms 'cup' and 'mug'.
For example, many might be truly surprised to learn that their morning 'cup of coffee' is actually a mug of coffee.
While the receptacle shown can be reasonably described as a 'cup', it is indeed not a mug.
However, mugs can also be made of glass.
Only one confused here is you. Go take your glass mug and start your own self-serving thread. Geeezes, you always have to be the center of attention.
Pack Rat wrote:Stop distracting.
Votanic wrote:Au contraire.
T'is you who seems to be throwing a tissy-fit,
because people would rather discuss the particulars of servingware, that waste time engaging with anymore of your contrived and calculating, political-propaganda posts.
Dukasaur wrote:saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
DirtyDishSoap wrote:Now that i look at it, it does look more like 75% full.
Votanic wrote:Pack Rat wrote:Stop distracting.
Woah, hold on a minute, rat...
Who is being distracting?
Oh surely not you by pointlessly reposting the thread's OP image.
Maybe you were hoping to distract from my brilliant summation of your entire, pathetic existence.
Here, let me repeat it:Votanic wrote:Au contraire.
T'is you who seems to be throwing a tissy-fit,
because people would rather discuss the particulars of servingware, that waste time engaging with anymore of your contrived and calculating, political-propaganda posts.
DirtyDishSoap wrote:Now that i look at it, it does look more like 75% full.
Dukasaur wrote: That was the night I broke into St. Mike's Cathedral and shat on the Archibishop's desk
mookiemcgee wrote:DirtyDishSoap wrote:Now that i look at it, it does look more like 75% full.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users