BEARS AND COLTS

by **P Gizzle** on Tue Jan 23, 2007 10:16 am

that works too

by **Zackismet** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:58 pm

i HATE when people act like they know who's going to win- they bring up all these statistics and stats and crap and use it all to prove whichever team they think will win. Well you know what ??? SHIT HAPPENS!! You DON'T know who's going to win, so don't CT like it!! Especially if you're right, don't be a complete dick about about it!!!!!! Patriots were supposed to beat the colts, what happened!?! SHIT DID!!!

So root for your team all you like, say they're better and you think they're going to win, BUT DON'T SAY IT'S OBVIOUS THEY WILL OR "bears will win, but just by a little" <<--some crap like that!!!

anyway- GO BEARS!!!!!!

by **war_bloodline** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 7:19 pm

I am going for the Colts all the way.

I go for anyone that makes it in the AFC.
Becuse of the Denver Broncos are AFC.
and my family is from Terre Haute, Indiana.

by **P Gizzle** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 7:24 pm

ain't that where larry bird is from?

by **war_bloodline** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 7:30 pm

No, he was from West Baden Springs, IN just near French Lick, IN.

by **P Gizzle** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 7:43 pm

ok, i knew he was down there......

oh, now i know why i thought that.....ISU is in Terre Haute....

forgive my stupidity ](*,)

by **war_bloodline** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:00 pm

lol, that's fine

by **P Gizzle** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:06 pm

so, what's ur score for the Super Bowl?

i got 27-17 Colts

by **war_bloodline** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:09 pm

ummm, man I would have to say 16-14 Colts

by **war_bloodline** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:09 pm

Both teams have strong D's.

by **P Gizzle** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:12 pm

well the colts didnt until Bob Sanders came back...

im looking for Peyton to throw down field early, then be able to hit his running backs later....

the hawks almost won with running up the gut....the colts will capitalize on that and it should be fairly high scoring on the colts end

by **war_bloodline** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:22 pm

well the colts didnt until Bob Sanders came back

True.

im looking for Peyton to throw down field early, then be able to hit his running backs later

I hope so, but when Peyton does, Marvin H., Aaron M., Reggie W. all have to get under that ball quick, or Chicago will pick it off.

I also see Peyton going to Clark on short throws to, he has held them up when they needed him.

im looking for Peyton to throw down field early, then be able to hit his running backs later

I really hope Joseph Addai and Dominic Rhodes finds the hole quick.
I have seen games where Chicago left open a hole a halfback tryed to fit in and they closed it just like that.

by **war_bloodline** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:23 pm

They have got to hold on to the ball, they did better last Sunday, but when they played the Ravens and the Chiefs they gave the ball up to many times to be in the playoffs.

by **P Gizzle** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:26 pm

very true......

if you watched the Seahawks game, you know that the Bears are bear-ly in the Super bowl....

the hawks coach (Holmgren) didn't realize that the hole was open and that Hasselbeck sucks, so he kept throwing it, or running outside plays.....

bottom line is, hasselbeck throws away ball in 4th qtr., Hawks are in Super Bowl.....

so, watch out, that hole will be important and if you don't capitalize on throwing the ball away (like Rexy seems to do all too much) then you will lose to an inferior team....(Steelers, Bears, etc., etc.)

by **war_bloodline** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:29 pm

True, what do you see the Colts defence doing to stop the Bears?

by **P Gizzle** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:34 pm

i see them trying to stop run early and then forcing Rexy out of the pocket

by **dcowboys055** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:34 pm

P Gizzle wrote:very true......

if you watched the Seahawks game, you know that the Bears are bear-ly in the Super bowl....

the hawks coach (Holmgren) didn't realize that the hole was open and that Hasselbeck sucks, so he kept throwing it, or running outside plays.....

bottom line is, hasselbeck throws away ball in 4th qtr., Hawks are in Super Bowl.....

so, watch out, that hole will be important and if you don't capitalize on throwing the ball away (like Rexy seems to do all too much) then you will lose to an inferior team....(Steelers, Bears, etc., etc.)

no offense, but sort of a dumb thing to say. did you watch the colts game? they looked simply awful in the first half. both teams looked good and bad at times. i have the colts winning 20-16

by **P Gizzle** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:36 pm

dcowboys055 wrote:
P Gizzle wrote:very true......

if you watched the Seahawks game, you know that the Bears are bear-ly in the Super bowl....

the hawks coach (Holmgren) didn't realize that the hole was open and that Hasselbeck sucks, so he kept throwing it, or running outside plays.....

bottom line is, hasselbeck throws away ball in 4th qtr., Hawks are in Super Bowl.....

so, watch out, that hole will be important and if you don't capitalize on throwing the ball away (like Rexy seems to do all too much) then you will lose to an inferior team....(Steelers, Bears, etc., etc.)

no offense, but sort of a dumb thing to say. did you watch the colts game? they looked simply awful in the first half. both teams looked good and bad at times. i have the colts winning 20-16

what part was dumb? so that i may explain to you my thoughts.....

by **dcowboys055** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:37 pm

i dont mean dumb as in not true, just irrelivant since both teams looked good and bad during their games

by **war_bloodline** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:38 pm

One thing is that they will have to have hold down Rex's go to guy in the air attack.
-Muhammad is one of the main one's, in the game vs. the Saint's he made some nice grabs that is something that Rex Grossman will see as his way out of a blitz (throwing it to Muhammad) and that is where the Colts can get the most INT's.

by **P Gizzle** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:39 pm

well the diff. is that the colts came back from an astonishing deficit, whereas the bears skimmed by AT HOME against a shaky team who in turn SKIMMED BY AT HOME against an even shakier team.

Bears>Seahawks>cowboys<Chargers<Patriots<Colts

see what im saying

by **war_bloodline** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:40 pm

i dont mean dumb as in not true, just irrelivant since both teams looked good and bad during their games

They are both strong but, both teams have a weakness and I think the Colts can gain the most from the weakness the Bears have.

by **war_bloodline** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 8:43 pm

well the diff. is that the colts came back from an astonishing deficit, whereas the bears skimmed by AT HOME against a shaky team who in turn SKIMMED BY AT HOME against an even shakier team.

Oh yeah I see what you are saying.

Do you think that the Colts will have to look to Vinatieri in the end, as like what NE had to do when he played for them?

by **P Gizzle** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:38 pm

war_bloodline wrote:
well the diff. is that the colts came back from an astonishing deficit, whereas the bears skimmed by AT HOME against a shaky team who in turn SKIMMED BY AT HOME against an even shakier team.

Oh yeah I see what you are saying.

Do you think that the Colts will have to look to Vinatieri in the end, as like what NE had to do when he played for them?

nope, i think this will be a clear cut win.....it'll be a tough one, but everyone will realize who truly deserves to be the Super Bowl Champs....but if the Bears get rid of Rexy, man, watch out the Hawks have competition

by **war_bloodline** on Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:45 pm

The Bears back-up QB is Brian Griese, if they play him because he has played more years, then the game is over for Chicago for sure.
When Griese played here in Denver, there was a dull spell for the Broncos the few years he played for us.
He would just make the game worse for the Bears, and Rex well this is his 4th year and his first playoffs let alone his first Super Bowl, but it's also Peyton's first Super Bowl but he has been in more playoffs.

BEARS AND COLTS

Who is online