Ham wrote:VIVA PINATA !!!!!
Not all games with good graphics suck. I mean cmon. You cant be "hatin" because it looks pretty so your excuse is the only thing about the game is the graphics.
True, but not all games with good graphics are "OMG t3h AWESOME!!!!11!1" either. Every system has its blockbusters and its failures as well as those that revel in mediocrity.
I own a gaming rig, and I like high quality in my graphics *hugs my computer*
However, I'm not going to spend $150-250 more dollars + Online fees, attachments, add-ons, shipping for repairs, and my time downloading patches for problems that shouldn't exist. What sold the PS2 was that it was a complete package right out of the box, and unlike many, many others mine didn't have the dreaded read error.
The PS3 and the 360 have a few blockbuster games to justify their high price point "Oh you gotta get a 360 so you can play Gears of War" "Oh, get a PS3, Resistance looks soooooo cool!"
I prefer "Hey, get a Wii, Nintendo has been making game systems since the 1960s, they have their act together."
Sony doesn't:
They've got sales issues:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15854413/
They've got technical problems that involve blaming the consumer's TV:
http://biz.gamedaily.com/industry/news/?id=14518
And they're losing exclusives:
http://www.totalvideogames.com/news/Koe ... 6341_0.htm
They also don't care that they design flawed electronics:
http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?si ... 07&tid=212
Oh, and don't forget their rootkit fiasco from not too far back.
Forgive me if this reminds me of the Titanic.
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!