Moderator: Community Team
pmac666 wrote:Theres something in motion you cannot comprehend. Cant wait for the tears tho.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=237819&p=5341485#p5341483
saxitoxin wrote:President Trump today represented the United States Government in the wreath-laying ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery on the anniversary of the deaths of 13 American soldiers KIA during the chaotic Biden retreat from Afghanistan.
Biden did not attend as he was enjoying a long weekend at the beach. Kamala did not attend as she was at a fundraiser with executives from the weapons conglomerate Raytheon.
The relatives of some of the American service members who were killed appeared on stage at the Republican National Convention last month, saying Biden had never publicly named their loved ones.
“Joe Biden has refused to recognize their sacrifice,” Christy Shamblin, the mother-in-law of Sgt. Gee, told the crowd. “Donald Trump knew all of our children’s names. He knew all of their stories.”
(...)
A Biden administration review of the withdrawal acknowledged that the evacuation of Americans and allies from Afghanistan should have started sooner, but attributed the delays to the Afghan government and military, and to U.S. military and intelligence community assessments.
The top two U.S. generals who oversaw the evacuation said the administration inadequately planned for the withdrawal. The nation’s top-ranking military officer at the time, then-Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley, told lawmakers earlier this year he had urged Biden to keep a residual force of 2,500 forces to give backup. Instead, Biden decided to keep a much smaller force of 650 that would be limited to securing the U.S. embassy.
pmac666 wrote:Theres something in motion you cannot comprehend. Cant wait for the tears tho.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=237819&p=5341485#p5341483
jusplay4fun wrote:saxitoxin wrote:President Trump today represented the United States Government in the wreath-laying ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery on the anniversary of the deaths of 13 American soldiers KIA during the chaotic Biden retreat from Afghanistan.
Biden did not attend as he was enjoying a long weekend at the beach. Kamala did not attend as she was at a fundraiser with executives from the weapons conglomerate Raytheon.
It seems very unlikely that Biden or the Biden-Harris Administration will ever admit their UTTER FAILURE in the hectic withdraw from Afghanistan that cost 13 brave Marines and naval personel their lives as they made the ULTIMATE Sacrifice for their Nation.The relatives of some of the American service members who were killed appeared on stage at the Republican National Convention last month, saying Biden had never publicly named their loved ones.
“Joe Biden has refused to recognize their sacrifice,” Christy Shamblin, the mother-in-law of Sgt. Gee, told the crowd. “Donald Trump knew all of our children’s names. He knew all of their stories.”
(...)
A Biden administration review of the withdrawal acknowledged that the evacuation of Americans and allies from Afghanistan should have started sooner, but attributed the delays to the Afghan government and military, and to U.S. military and intelligence community assessments.
The top two U.S. generals who oversaw the evacuation said the administration inadequately planned for the withdrawal. The nation’s top-ranking military officer at the time, then-Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley, told lawmakers earlier this year he had urged Biden to keep a residual force of 2,500 forces to give backup. Instead, Biden decided to keep a much smaller force of 650 that would be limited to securing the U.S. embassy.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-trump-appears-at-arlington-cemetery-event-honoring-13-service-members-killed-in-kabul-bombing#:~:text=%E2%80%9CEver%20since%20I%20became%20Vice,and%20Ryan%2C%E2%80%9D%20Biden%20said.
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
kentington wrote:
I am not a Trump supporter. I think everyone at the top is corrupt. To even get a chance up there you won't be clean. There should be a huge audit and there should be a lot of arrests. The only problem is that the 'dirt' is not unknown by people who have the authority to arrest. But that is a different story.
Do you have a problem with Joe and his showers with his daughter? What about him sniffing little kids? In public he can't seem to keep his hands to himself. What about Tara Reade?
ConfederateSS wrote: Vote for Kamala
HitRed wrote:Did Zuckerberg just concede the House, Senate and the Presidency to Trump?
ConfederateSS wrote: Vote for Kamala
mookiemcgee wrote:HitRed wrote:Did Zuckerberg just concede the House, Senate and the Presidency to Trump?
I think he saw the tax on unrealized gains for people with over 100m in assets and decided he needed to soft endorse Trump, suggesting the Biden admin lied about Covid vaccine efficacy for sure.
pmac666 wrote:Theres something in motion you cannot comprehend. Cant wait for the tears tho.
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=237819&p=5341485#p5341483
Harris faced criticism for inflating her prosecutorial record in 2003 DA campaign
Harris was challenged in 2003 district attorney debate
In 2003, during Kamala Harris' run for San Francisco district attorney, her campaign sent out mailers promoting her candidacy that touted her record as a prosecutor with "thirteen years of courtroom experience."
The mailers, copies of which ABC News has obtained, portrayed Harris as "the veteran prosecutor we need to turn around our District Attorney office" and claimed she had a "long track record of being an outstanding public prosecutor."
"Kamala has tried hundreds of serious and violent felonies, including homicide, rape, and child sexual assault cases," the mailer stated.
But during a debate held in the runup to Election Day 2003 on KGO Radio, Harris' then-opponent, veteran criminal defense attorney Bill Fazio, accused her of misleading voters about her record as a prosecutor and deputy district attorney in California's Alameda County.
"How many cases have you tried? Can you tell us how many serious felonies you have tried? Can you tell us one?" Fazio asked Harris, according to audio ABC News obtained of the debate, which also included then-current San Francisco District Attorney Terence Hallinan.
"I've tried about 50 cases, Mr. Fazio, and it's about leadership," Harris responded.
Fazio then pointed out campaign literature where Harris had been claiming a more extensive prosecutorial record.
"Ms. Harris, why does your information, which is still published, say that you tried hundreds of serious felonies? I think that's misleading. I think that's disingenuous. I think that shows that you are incapable of leadership and you're not to be trusted," Fazio said. "You continue to put out information which says you have tried hundreds of serious felonies."
Harris, in response, did not dispute Fazio's claims and instead pivoted, stating that "leadership, working with different communities as a career prosecutor, I've done that, which is why I, not you, have every law enforcement organization's endorsement."
(...)
While some of Harris' 2003 literature said that Harris had "tried" hundreds of cases, other campaign literature at the time said she had "prosecuted" hundreds of cases -- including her campaign website, which used the word "prosecuted" instead of "tried," according to a version of the web page viewed by ABC News via the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine.
Experts told ABC News that's an important distinction.
jusplay4fun wrote:What other issues will she try to STEAL from Trump?
Donald Trump’s claim on his Truth Social platform Friday that he will be “great for women and their reproductive rights” was met with swift and cutting scorn from numerous social media users, with many saying it looks like the politician is now “running scared” after the overwhelming wave of support for his rival Kamala Harris during the Democratic National Convention.
“Saying he will be ‘Great’ For ‘Reproductive Rights’ is like Hannibal Lecter saying he will be a great dinner guest,” quipped one person on X.
Dukasaur wrote:jusplay4fun wrote:What other issues will she try to STEAL from Trump?
I don't know. What issue will Trump tries to steal from her?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-claim-great-reproductive-005531750.htmlDonald Trump’s claim on his Truth Social platform Friday that he will be “great for women and their reproductive rights” was met with swift and cutting scorn from numerous social media users, with many saying it looks like the politician is now “running scared” after the overwhelming wave of support for his rival Kamala Harris during the Democratic National Convention.
“Saying he will be ‘Great’ For ‘Reproductive Rights’ is like Hannibal Lecter saying he will be a great dinner guest,” quipped one person on X.
Votanic wrote:Allowing normal women (if there's any left...) to be good, fertile wives and mothers[/b]
ConfederateSS wrote: Vote for Kamala
mookiemcgee wrote:Votanic wrote:Allowing normal women (if there's any left...) to be good, fertile wives and mothers[/b]
Say your an incel, without saying your an incel
ConfederateSS wrote: Vote for Kamala
Votanic wrote:Allowing normal women (if there's any left...) to be good, fertile wives and mothers,
(...)
is also a reproductive right.
Dukasaur wrote:Votanic wrote:Allowing normal women (if there's any left...) to be good, fertile wives and mothers,
(...)
is also a reproductive right.
It is, but it's never been threatened.
The other kind has.
Votanic wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:Votanic wrote:Allowing normal women (if there's any left...) to be good, fertile wives and mothers[/b]
Say your an incel, without saying your an incel
Speaking long-tested social and biological truths in opposition to daft woke/liberal ideology is hardly that, mook.
Actually, you seem like the one desperate to strike a casual pose and play hip to any short-term modern madness, ...lest you receive a politically-motivated henpecking to within an inch of your beta life.
Pack Rat wrote:Mookie is smart enough to shy away from a moronic challenge.
Votanic wrote:Votanic wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:Votanic wrote:Allowing normal women (if there's any left...) to be good, fertile wives and mothers
Say your an incel, without saying your an incel
Speaking long-tested social and biological truths in opposition to daft woke/liberal ideology is hardly that, mook.
Actually, you seem like the one desperate to strike a casual pose and play hip to any short-term modern madness, ...lest you receive a politically-motivated henpecking to within an inch of your beta life.
HEY moofie, did you want to respond to this?
Because just posting a Youtube video that didn't even display properly just seems like adesperate and irrelevant dodge of the issue.
CocaineBingeTitanic wrote:Allowing normal women (if there's any left...) to be good, fertile wives and mothers, free of toxic peer-pressure and harassment from malevolent covens of childless, cat-worshipping, misandristic Satanists (some of which are even cis) is also a reproductive right.
ConfederateSS wrote: Vote for Kamala
Return to Out, out, brief candle!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users