Conquer Club

Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Winners See 1st Post!

Tournaments completed in 2010.

Moderator: Tournament Directors

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 1

Postby Chariot of Fire on Sun Apr 25, 2010 12:43 am

(Also - Feet Biters and Face Kickers, did you notice your results table proximity?!)


lol yeah, nicely done :D Though I think we might be biting dust this time - hard to say.

I notice from the rules that the scores are reset (R3) so I guess it's not the end of the world. You may be cursing your decision though Foxy, sitting atop the table as you are ;)

Best of luck to all remaining participants - it's been a great tourney thus far and with very good play from all involved.
User avatar
Colonel Chariot of Fire
 
Posts: 3661
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
Location: Buckinghamshire U.K.

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 2 Batch 3

Postby Incandenza on Fri Apr 30, 2010 3:35 am

Foxglove wrote:(Also - Feet Biters and Face Kickers, did you notice your results table proximity?!)


Indeed, tho like CoF we're not exactly lighting the world on fire in our first four... But we'll see, plenty of faces left to be kicked. 8-)
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 1

Postby waseemalim on Fri Apr 30, 2010 9:19 pm

Hamanu is back. He'll be taking over from the next set.
Life is what happens while you are busy playing Conquer Club.
Brigadier waseemalim
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 11:24 pm

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 1

Postby Foxglove on Sun May 02, 2010 1:05 pm

waseemalim wrote:Hamanu is back. He'll be taking over from the next set.


Ok. I'll change his name back in the results next time I update.
Brigadier Foxglove
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:05 pm

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Bruceswar on Wed May 12, 2010 3:11 am

Round 3 Batch 2 PM's sent. GL. 8-)
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Dako on Wed May 12, 2010 9:30 am

Any update on standings?
Image
User avatar
Colonel Dako
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:07 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Foxglove on Wed May 12, 2010 10:13 am

Dako wrote:Any update on standings?


I will update as soon as all games from Round 3, Batch 1 have been completed.
Brigadier Foxglove
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:05 pm

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Incandenza on Wed May 12, 2010 6:23 pm

Foxglove wrote:
Dako wrote:Any update on standings?


I will update as soon as all games from Round 3, Batch 1 have been completed.


Quick 'n dirty (thanks to Tourney Stats plugin):
chariot/dako 3-1
john/mong 3-1
inc/mepps 2-1
wolf/pander 1-1
lokis/tiger 1-2
wasee/demy 1-2
rabbit/foxy 1-2
mk/space 1-3
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Foxglove on Thu May 13, 2010 11:43 pm

Incandenza wrote:
Foxglove wrote:
Dako wrote:Any update on standings?


I will update as soon as all games from Round 3, Batch 1 have been completed.


Quick 'n dirty (thanks to Tourney Stats plugin):
chariot/dako 3-1
john/mong 3-1
inc/mepps 2-1
wolf/pander 1-1
lokis/tiger 1-2
wasee/demy 1-2
rabbit/foxy 1-2
mk/space 1-3


Thanks :) It's more work to update my files and make screenshots yadda yadda yadda! The games from batch 1 are almost complete.
Brigadier Foxglove
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:05 pm

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Incandenza on Mon May 17, 2010 2:10 pm

Foxglove wrote:Thanks :) It's more work to update my files and make screenshots yadda yadda yadda! The games from batch 1 are almost complete.


No problemo. And it looks like the last few Batch 1 games have been decided, if not completed, so the stats going into Batch 2 will be:
chariot/dako 3-1
john/mong 3-1
inc/mepps 2-2
wolf/pander 2-2
wasee/demy 2-2
rabbit/foxy 2-2
lokis/tiger 1-3
mk/space 1-3

Figure it'll take 4 wins and some sort of tiebreaker edge to make the next round.
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Dako on Tue May 18, 2010 4:20 pm

Batch 1 has ended.

Batch 2 looks like this to me:

chariot/dako 1-1
john/mong 1-2
inc/mepps 1-1
wolf/pander 1-1
wasee/demy 0-1
rabbit/foxy 1-0
lokis/tiger 1-0
mk/space 1-1

Very tight fight. At least on our games.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Dako
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:07 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Foxglove on Tue May 18, 2010 5:36 pm

Dako wrote:Batch 1 has ended.


I just noticed this today too! I will update the results on the first page tonight.
Brigadier Foxglove
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:05 pm

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Incandenza on Tue May 18, 2010 5:45 pm

Dako wrote:Batch 1 has ended.

Batch 2 looks like this to me:

chariot/dako 1-1
john/mong 1-2
inc/mepps 1-1
wolf/pander 1-1
wasee/demy 0-1
rabbit/foxy 1-0
lokis/tiger 1-0
mk/space 1-1

Very tight fight. At least on our games.


Tiebreakers are going to be the real key, since it looks like there's going to be quite the logjam at 4-3.
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby waseemalim on Tue May 18, 2010 8:47 pm

This round really should have been a bit more games. doesn't seem like it will come to tiebreakers though, given that so many of the outcomes are mutually exclusive.
Life is what happens while you are busy playing Conquer Club.
Brigadier waseemalim
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 11:24 pm

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Foxglove on Tue May 18, 2010 10:17 pm

waseemalim wrote:This round really should have been a bit more games. doesn't seem like it will come to tiebreakers though, given that so many of the outcomes are mutually exclusive.


Perhaps so - we'll see how it works out!

-----------------

Results updated.
Brigadier Foxglove
 
Posts: 1308
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:05 pm

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Bruceswar on Tue May 18, 2010 11:01 pm

waseemalim wrote:This round really should have been a bit more games. doesn't seem like it will come to tiebreakers though, given that so many of the outcomes are mutually exclusive.



If per chance it were to come down to tie breakers we have a system already in place.

1. First rule would be a head to head record(round 3) with the 2, 3 or however many teams there are.
2. If we still have not figured it out. The it goes to Round 3 score + round 2 Score. Highest totals move on.

That should be more than enough to unbreak any ties.
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby waseemalim on Wed May 19, 2010 7:44 am

Bruceswar wrote:
waseemalim wrote:This round really should have been a bit more games. doesn't seem like it will come to tiebreakers though, given that so many of the outcomes are mutually exclusive.



If per chance it were to come down to tie breakers we have a system already in place.

1. First rule would be a head to head record(round 3) with the 2, 3 or however many teams there are.
2. If we still have not figured it out. The it goes to Round 3 score + round 2 Score. Highest totals move on.

That should be more than enough to unbreak any ties.



Yea, the tiebreaker really is a bit arbitrary. Everyone plays just 1 game against another team in round 3 -- which I doubt offers significant perspective. In the case of the tie, all round 3 games, rightfully, should have equal weight. It's just a manifestion of the limited games this round.
Life is what happens while you are busy playing Conquer Club.
Brigadier waseemalim
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 11:24 pm

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby waseemalim on Fri May 21, 2010 8:25 pm

Thanks to dice from Olympus, we won't be going to the finals.

Game 6960771
Life is what happens while you are busy playing Conquer Club.
Brigadier waseemalim
 
Posts: 520
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 11:24 pm

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Royal Panda on Sat May 22, 2010 5:47 am

waseemalim wrote:Thanks to dice from Olympus, we won't be going to the finals.

Game 6960771


Even I'm on the verge of hating my partner for that. I NEVER get that sort of luck!
User avatar
Brigadier Royal Panda
 
Posts: 838
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:44 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Royal Panda on Sat May 22, 2010 6:17 pm

From games that appear to be decided, I make it:

chariot/dako 5-2
john/mong 4-3
wolf/pander 4-3
inc/mepps 3-3 (1 undecided)
lokis/tiger 3-3 (1 undecided)
rabbit/foxy 3-4
wasee/demy 2-4 (1 undecided)
mk/space 2-4 (1 undecided)

Looking like tiebreaks won't be needed! Or only to decide who plays who... Undecided games:
Game 6960802 - should decide 4th qualifier
Game 6960768

Of course I can't account for any dice like Wolfpack's in that last Feudal War game....
User avatar
Brigadier Royal Panda
 
Posts: 838
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:44 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Dako on Sun May 23, 2010 2:09 am

Game 6960735 is far from decided. It still can go either way.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Dako
 
Posts: 3987
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:07 am
Location: St. Petersburg, Russia

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Royal Panda on Sun May 23, 2010 4:11 am

Dako wrote:Game 6960735 is far from decided. It still can go either way.


Ah fair enough, those ?'s hiding the true story from me there!
User avatar
Brigadier Royal Panda
 
Posts: 838
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:44 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Bruceswar on Wed May 26, 2010 11:42 pm

Any questions or concerns. Just PM me as I look at PM's quicker than this thread.
Highest Rank: 26 Highest Score: 3480
Image
User avatar
Corporal Bruceswar
 
Posts: 9713
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 12:36 am
Location: Cow Pastures

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Incandenza on Fri Jun 04, 2010 11:16 pm

Card values are getting vertiginous in our Pacman game with lokis and tiger, so expect a resolution one way or the other shortly.
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Re: Bruceswar's and Foxy's Masters Doubles Round 3 Batch 2

Postby Chariot of Fire on Sat Jun 05, 2010 2:25 am

Dako wrote:Game 6960735 is far from decided. It still can go either way.


It did go our way in the end. gg rabbit/foxy
User avatar
Colonel Chariot of Fire
 
Posts: 3661
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:13 am
Location: Buckinghamshire U.K.

PreviousNext

Return to Completed 2010

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users