Moderator: Tournament Directors
HardAttack wrote:Tomorrow is friday and you (Lx) asked team captains to send their teams to you. That means we are going to receive second step (round 2) games in sunday. I dont know how other groups are doing, but half of our games are going on. 1 Triple - 1 Quad - and 2 doubles i think.
My question is, can we make the schedule in such a way that every round to be played in 3 weeks instead 2 ?
If not, i am afraid that will end up with when we reach to round 4, we still be playing round 2 games mate.
If it is not a big deal, please consider it
Btw, Game 5241037 goes to imperial dragoons. To your attention.
artur1 wrote:hi there thx for hosting this tournament. I have a question, why is the quad win worth 5 points? Isnt 4 a better choise? As it is now, a win in the quads is worth more than winning all singels. If you get a bad drop or some bad rolls in the first round the whole set of games is lost.
Lindax wrote:artur1 wrote:hi there thx for hosting this tournament. I have a question, why is the quad win worth 5 points? Isnt 4 a better choise? As it is now, a win in the quads is worth more than winning all singels. If you get a bad drop or some bad rolls in the first round the whole set of games is lost.
I agree. However, I needed an uneven amount of points to avoid the long tiebreaker games we had the first tournament. I choose to make the quads 5 points instead of 4. I thought that the most appropriate, since the quad game is usually the last to finish and thus the tiebreaker.
Lx
artur1 wrote:Lindax wrote:artur1 wrote:hi there thx for hosting this tournament. I have a question, why is the quad win worth 5 points? Isnt 4 a better choise? As it is now, a win in the quads is worth more than winning all singels. If you get a bad drop or some bad rolls in the first round the whole set of games is lost.
I agree. However, I needed an uneven amount of points to avoid the long tiebreaker games we had the first tournament. I choose to make the quads 5 points instead of 4. I thought that the most appropriate, since the quad game is usually the last to finish and thus the tiebreaker.
Lx
I thought that was the reason but, why not be able to split points?
Lindax wrote:artur1 wrote:Lindax wrote:artur1 wrote:hi there thx for hosting this tournament. I have a question, why is the quad win worth 5 points? Isnt 4 a better choise? As it is now, a win in the quads is worth more than winning all singels. If you get a bad drop or some bad rolls in the first round the whole set of games is lost.
I agree. However, I needed an uneven amount of points to avoid the long tiebreaker games we had the first tournament. I choose to make the quads 5 points instead of 4. I thought that the most appropriate, since the quad game is usually the last to finish and thus the tiebreaker.
Lx
I thought that was the reason but, why not be able to split points?
That's easy Artur: I need a decision on which team wins. It's the amount of wins that count, not the points you get. The points only come into play if teams have the same amount of wins....
Lx
Pedronicus wrote:I've got to say that the layout and presentation of the scores / teams etc are excellent Linda
Users browsing this forum: No registered users