[Official] First Trench Warfare Tournament [nolefan5311]

by **uk massive** on Thu Apr 12, 2012 2:29 pm

oh yes in please

by **Gilligan** on Thu Apr 12, 2012 2:32 pm

Lookin' for 9 more.

by **Culs De Sac** on Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:15 pm

In pls

by **CoopClaret** on Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:43 pm

in please

by **agentcom** on Thu Apr 12, 2012 6:52 pm

I didn't notice that it was unlimited forts until someone pointed it out a few pages ago. Not sure that's the best setting.

I agree with those that have spoken up about round limits. Not really sure how that will play out with a 6 person game. If the winner is clear by round 20, then fine. But I'm not sure this will be the case. Perhaps you should do round 1 at a 30 round limit but reserve the right to change it to 20 for subsequent rounds.

Finally, you should revise the scoring to make it more fair between people who are in 6 and 5 player groups. Right now the players that get assigned to 5 player groups are at a disadvantage. Total points awarded/Players should be equal in both groups. Unless, I'm not thinking of something that seems to be the fairest way of doing things.

What I would actually do if I was running this is just be sure you get enough players to divide evenly by 6. You don't seem to be having problems getting sign-ups, so you'll probably have some reserves.

by **Gilligan** on Thu Apr 12, 2012 6:55 pm

agentcom wrote:I didn't notice that it was unlimited forts until someone pointed it out a few pages ago. Not sure that's the best setting.

I agree with those that have spoken up about round limits. Not really sure how that will play out with a 6 person game. If the winner is clear by round 20, then fine. But I'm not sure this will be the case. Perhaps you should do round 1 at a 30 round limit but reserve the right to change it to 20 for subsequent rounds.

Finally, you should revise the scoring to make it more fair between people who are in 6 and 5 player groups. Right now the players that get assigned to 5 player groups are at a disadvantage. Total points awarded/Players should be equal in both groups. Unless, I'm not thinking of something that seems to be the fairest way of doing things.

What I would actually do if I was running this is just be sure you get enough players to divide evenly by 6. You don't seem to be having problems getting sign-ups, so you'll probably have some reserves.

I will send a PM to everyone about changing the limit to thirty rounds. As far as forts, I could change it to chained but I thought unlimited would be better for more options in succeeding rounds.

As far as scoring - it's either or. Either all games will be 5 players or 6 players. I didn't want to set anything on stone as I didn't know what the outcome would be like.