Moderator: Community Team
shoop76 wrote:I guess I am just disagree with Duk's assessment. Shoop has not won this event. It seems participation has been steady throughout and there has been no increase in these last 2 events. I also don't see anyone here posting that change is necessary. I think if you want to increase participation you need to run some smaller tournaments. Most of these tourneys have a high game load which scares people away.
DoomYoshi wrote:Here they are: borrowing heavily from second Isonzo.
DoomYoshi wrote:It seems we haven't had a basic tourney in a while.
lanceeee wrote:As having just started the tournament within in the last couple of months, I don't have the expectation that I could win it over someone that has already been playing a year. I started playing because I like trench games and there have been some good trench tournaments recently.
Having secondary scoreboards, such as by year or phase (such as a trench phase of the war) would be a way to entice people to start playing or continue playing.
Dukasaur wrote:We can postpone a decision for a while.
DoomYoshi has returned, and he was written the next three tournaments for us. They are much smaller affairs than the gargantuan things I've been writing lately, so I'm willing to let them stand as 2-medal tournaments.
Would this make everyone happier: A toned-down version of my previous proposal, in which we keep small, basic tournaments at 2 medals, but still increase the number for the larger ones?DoomYoshi wrote:Here they are: borrowing heavily from second Isonzo.DoomYoshi wrote:It seems we haven't had a basic tourney in a while.
Tviorr wrote:latest tourney is listing 4 tokens for the winner?
Seems a bit steep.
1 for the second place should be okay, I think.
Tviorr wrote:Sorry. Misread the drop list for first place. I meant medal, I guess, not token. - The one that counts on the scoreboard, whatever its called.
Only one of those for the winner of 4th Iso, so it was just because I cant read
muti wrote:Not sure if it's just me but I don't understand which of the lists of maps in the token criteria are current and which are past. Could it be clarified please?
Almost a caricature of a bad general
Dukasaur wrote:Another Whac-a-Mod game for Great War fans.
Game 16236846
Pass is three words which complete this sentence: The Grand and Petite Morin are reminiscent of the
DoomYoshi wrote:Tokens
Upcoming change August 26th:
World 2.1
Classic Cities: London
Germany
World War I Gallipoli
Battle for Iraq!
Italy
Rail Europe
Poison Rome
Land and Sea
4 Star Meats
https://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=find2&data%5Boptions%5D%5BState%5D=W&data%5Boptions%5D%5BMapNo%5D=238,16,209,53,66,132,136,90,244,118&data%5Border%5D=GameNo%20desc&data%5Btotallimit%5D=100&data%5Bjoinability%5D%5BPublic%5D=1&data%5Bjoinability%5D%5BPrivate%5D=1EDIT:
In 1915, much is happening in the south, as campaigns in Africa and the Middle East heat up. The big operation of the year, however, is the Dardanelles-Gallipoli operation. It's time to update our token-dropping maps accordingly. On February 19th, on the 100th anniversary of the initial naval bombardment of the Gallipoli forts, we will add a new group of maps to the token-dropping list:
Gallipoli (beta) map
WWI Ottoman
Middle East
Europa
Dark Continent
Africa II
Australia
New Zealand
The current list, (Europe1914, Transsib1914, Austro-Hungarian Empire, Unification Germany, England, France1789, and Benelux) will remain active for now and continue dropping tokens for another month, until March 19th.
Original (September 17) list: Europe1914, Austro-Hungarian Empire, King of the Mountains, and Balkan Peninsula
Second (November 17) list: Europe1914, Russia as represented by Transsib1914, Austria as represented by Austro-Hungarian Empire, Germany represented by Unification Germany, Britain represented by England, France represented by France1789, Belgium represented by Benelux.
thelord wrote:Link doesnt seem to work to find eligible games?
Return to Announcement Archives
Users browsing this forum: No registered users