Chariot of Fire wrote:It'll be interesting to see how many games HA's 200th Tourney ends up being comprised of. There will possibly be a record there.
16402 played games so far
2507 actual participants if I remember correctly without looking it up
Moderator: Community Team
Chariot of Fire wrote:It'll be interesting to see how many games HA's 200th Tourney ends up being comprised of. There will possibly be a record there.
HighlanderAttack wrote:Chariot of Fire wrote:It'll be interesting to see how many games HA's 200th Tourney ends up being comprised of. There will possibly be a record there.
16402 played games so far
2507 actual participants if I remember correctly without looking it up
TheForgivenOne wrote:Gillipig wrote:bigbad 4573 wrote:I haven't read all those posts, way to many, but a lot of discension. the site is cool, the dice suck, the improvements are cool, (more would be cooler) capatalism sucks, the players - some cool and some suck, but let's all try to stay positive and supportive. Cynisism and negativity are the enemy. Oh and a personal request, I would like to seee an alternative to the random deal, maybe take turns picking regions pre-play, or even that election system, where you bid for regions. That's a whole other level of fun. To often the deal dictates. An alternative would be wonderful.
This sounds like a very good idea. I'd support it 100% if it were to be put in the suggestion part of forum.
It's already been suggested. Have to be reasonable though, could you imagine 8 players trying to play a game like this on a relatively big map?
HighlanderAttack wrote:jbrettlip wrote:Betting is allowed. There is a head to head challenge between two players with the loser having to buy the winner premium. Essentially gambling, but no one on this site cared when I raised the concern. So even though the rules say no betting, it is obviously going on here.
This is not real gambling. Buying a premium for someone u play against is not real gambling. Trust me--I used to be a real gambler--this anything this site has would never compare.
Gillipig wrote:When you search for conquer cup in "find a tournament" it says that conquer cup I is abandoned. And lack's name is crossed over. Is it abandoned ?
AndyDufresne wrote:Gillipig wrote:When you search for conquer cup in "find a tournament" it says that conquer cup I is abandoned. And lack's name is crossed over. Is it abandoned ?
No, it is just a work around I think using the Tournament Tool so it doesn't interfere with Community-Run Tournaments, the Tournament Page, and Stats.
--Andy
Gillipig wrote:Good !
I think I found the hardest group in the cup! Game 9979916, average score of 2303. That's more than a thousand point per player more than this group for example : Game 9980018.
Lindax wrote:I'm very unhappy that the amount of players went from 6 to 5 in the games. I don;t think I would have joined had I known that beforehand. It's a different game now....
Lx
gStrong wrote:Quick question, is the Cup game supposed to count as one of my four games? I understood that it would not so I joined the tournamet.
CC wrote:"Premium Membership isn't necessary - you can still play Conquer Cup games even if you've reached the limit on active games"
Gillipig wrote:gStrong wrote:Quick question, is the Cup game supposed to count as one of my four games? I understood that it would not so I joined the tournamet.CC wrote:"Premium Membership isn't necessary - you can still play Conquer Cup games even if you've reached the limit on active games"
I interpret this as a no to your question but if you want to make sure you can try to create some games and see when you're not able to create more games.
TheForgivenOne wrote:Gillipig wrote:bigbad 4573 wrote:I haven't read all those posts, way to many, but a lot of discension. the site is cool, the dice suck, the improvements are cool, (more would be cooler) capatalism sucks, the players - some cool and some suck, but let's all try to stay positive and supportive. Cynisism and negativity are the enemy. Oh and a personal request, I would like to seee an alternative to the random deal, maybe take turns picking regions pre-play, or even that election system, where you bid for regions. That's a whole other level of fun. To often the deal dictates. An alternative would be wonderful.
This sounds like a very good idea. I'd support it 100% if it were to be put in the suggestion part of forum.
It's already been suggested. Have to be reasonable though, could you imagine 8 players trying to play a game like this on a relatively big map?
jbrettlip wrote:HighlanderAttack wrote:jbrettlip wrote:Betting is allowed. There is a head to head challenge between two players with the loser having to buy the winner premium. Essentially gambling, but no one on this site cared when I raised the concern. So even though the rules say no betting, it is obviously going on here.
This is not real gambling. Buying a premium for someone u play against is not real gambling. Trust me--I used to be a real gambler--this anything this site has would never compare.
Loser buys winner premium....therefore lost something of value to the winner ($25). This is a BET, not a reward for winning a tourney. It is the same if I challenge someone to a 1 v 1 for $100. Just because the prize is through CC doesn't make it different. It just made it acceptable to Lack, Andy and the other mods who like to moderate to their own whims and not the rules.
HighlanderAttack wrote:jbrettlip wrote:HighlanderAttack wrote:jbrettlip wrote:Betting is allowed. There is a head to head challenge between two players with the loser having to buy the winner premium. Essentially gambling, but no one on this site cared when I raised the concern. So even though the rules say no betting, it is obviously going on here.
This is not real gambling. Buying a premium for someone u play against is not real gambling. Trust me--I used to be a real gambler--this anything this site has would never compare.
Loser buys winner premium....therefore lost something of value to the winner ($25). This is a BET, not a reward for winning a tourney. It is the same if I challenge someone to a 1 v 1 for $100. Just because the prize is through CC doesn't make it different. It just made it acceptable to Lack, Andy and the other mods who like to moderate to their own whims and not the rules.
you did not get my point--in reality if a penny was wagered it could be called a bet, but really?
TheForgivenOne wrote:Gillipig wrote:bigbad 4573 wrote:I haven't read all those posts, way to many, but a lot of discension. the site is cool, the dice suck, the improvements are cool, (more would be cooler) capatalism sucks, the players - some cool and some suck, but let's all try to stay positive and supportive. Cynisism and negativity are the enemy. Oh and a personal request, I would like to seee an alternative to the random deal, maybe take turns picking regions pre-play, or even that election system, where you bid for regions. That's a whole other level of fun. To often the deal dictates. An alternative would be wonderful.
This sounds like a very good idea. I'd support it 100% if it were to be put in the suggestion part of forum.
It's already been suggested. Have to be reasonable though, could you imagine 8 players trying to play a game like this on a relatively big map?
Tviorr wrote:Hmmm when I go look at Conquer Club I, the status says abandoned??
Is this correct?
AndyDufresne wrote:Gillipig wrote:When you search for conquer cup in "find a tournament" it says that conquer cup I is abandoned. And lack's name is crossed over. Is it abandoned ?
No, it is just a work around I think using the Tournament Tool so it doesn't interfere with Community-Run Tournaments, the Tournament Page, and Stats.
--Andy
Return to Announcement Archives
Users browsing this forum: No registered users