1929

by **thehippo8** on Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:12 am

Map Name: 1929
Mapmaker(s): thehippo8
Number of Territories: lots
Special Features: to be decided
What Makes This Map Worthy of Being Made: unsure - maybe it's too big?

Map Image:

Click image to enlarge.

by **natty dread** on Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:15 am

Nah, it's too small. You need to make it a lot bigger to get the army numbers to fit.

by **thehippo8** on Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:17 am

natty dread wrote:Nah, it's too small. You need to make it a lot bigger to get the army numbers to fit.

LOL ... firstly ... wow for being so quick, secondly not sure what happened to the image, I'll try loading that again!!

Edit: done

by **natty dread** on Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:52 am

Yeah it's still too small. You need to be able to fit 888:s in every territory, while also fitting in territory names in a readable size. With the current size I don't think that is possible.

by **thehippo8** on Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:02 am

natty dread wrote:Yeah it's still too small. You need to be able to fit 888:s in every territory, while also fitting in territory names in a readable size. With the current size I don't think that is possible.

Thanks ... will sort it out as soon as I can ... but do we want this?

by **thehippo8** on Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:16 am

thehippo8 wrote:
natty dread wrote:Yeah it's still too small. You need to be able to fit 888:s in every territory, while also fitting in territory names in a readable size. With the current size I don't think that is possible.

Thanks ... will sort it out as soon as I can ... but do we want this?

Weird, there must be a maximum size because no matter how large I make the image it shrinks back down ... lol ... either there is a tag that will allow a bigger picture or that's as big as the site allows!

by **anonymus** on Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:23 am

thehippo8 wrote:
thehippo8 wrote:
natty dread wrote:Yeah it's still too small. You need to be able to fit 888:s in every territory, while also fitting in territory names in a readable size. With the current size I don't think that is possible.

Thanks ... will sort it out as soon as I can ... but do we want this?

Weird, there must be a maximum size because no matter how large I make the image it shrinks back down ... lol ... either there is a tag that will allow a bigger picture or that's as big as the site allows!