by MarshalNey on Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:28 pm
Actually.... have you ever looked at the battle of Aspern-Essling?
It was Napoleon's first personal defeat in over a decade, and involved his attempt to force a crossing of the Danube near two villages (Aspern and Essling, no surprise).
The current of the Danube was very strong from the winter thaws, and the French engineers had a difficult time constructing bridges to Lobau island- a large island between the two banks- and then on to the other side. What was worse, however, was the fact that the Austrian army had spotted the French advance and had laid a very nasty trap.
After Napoleon had rushed forward a large advance guard to seize the villages, the Austrian commander (Archduke Charles) ordered his troops to send down the river flaming windmills, large logs, and anything else they could find to smash the bridges in two. Soon the bridges were destroyed, and Napoleon's army was cut in half!
The French engineers performed heroic deeds during the 2-day battle to keep the bridges up, repairing them constantly while waist- or neck-deep in icy waters (many would die from ordeal). Eventually the engineers constructed a more permanent set of bridges that allowed the bulk of the French army to cross. Nevertheless, by the end of the 2nd day the "permanent" bridges that had withstood smaller rams were broken yet again by barges sent down by the Austrians. This event caused Napoleon to give up the offensive, and only with great difficulty did he manage to get his army back to the starting bank to rest and regroup.
This was always a very interesting battle for me, as clever use of geography played a large part. I think using a killer neutral to simulate breaking the bridges in a river would be a perfect way to design a map of Aspern-Essling.