Moderator: Community Team
Minister Masket wrote:Neutrino wrote:Masket and Skoffin haven't exactly been hugely active... There might be something in that. Of course, then again neither of them are ever active...
You fool! I think I'm active by my standards.
You want me to talk, I'll talk....
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
Skittles! wrote:Minister Masket wrote:Neutrino wrote:Masket and Skoffin haven't exactly been hugely active... There might be something in that. Of course, then again neither of them are ever active...
You fool! I think I'm active by my standards.
You want me to talk, I'll talk....
Contribute more, eh. Or "yar'll walk the plank!" Or some lame thing like that.
As lovo seems he has like, eased off the deadline a bit, I'm sure it's safe to say we can stop with the mere conventional bandwagon/lynch hump-bug on Kwanton until we get a defence of some sorts.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
diddle wrote:wicked wrote:Fircoal wrote:@ Wicked, yes, we get the point, I'm tempted to vote you, not because of inactivity, but because you keep on saying we need to post and not bandwagon, and yet you do nothing about it.
Well I can't MAKE you post.![]()
And why would Nag have to defend himself from one vote on the first day? Don't see how just that is scummy, but I'll keep an open mind and sit back and watch the ensuing discussion.
One vote eh? Lets up the stakes then, and see if we can get anything positive to come out of this....
Unvote Vote Nag
Fircoal wrote:@ Wicked, yes, we get the point, I'm tempted to vote you, not because of inactivity, but because you keep on saying we need to post and not bandwagon, and yet you do nothing about it. Saying shallow words like that it doesn't matter how much you post. You aren't getting anything done. Maybe you should bring up something for better yet you can comment on the scummy thing Nag did that he still has ignored.![]()
@ NagFircoal wrote:nagerous wrote:Fircoal wrote:nagerous wrote:Unvote...
This is silly
Vote Fircoal
Lets use some common sense eh?
huh? I was, what I was doing was blatant bandwagonning. Voting for no reason other then bandwagonning. You know me well enough this is the type of Fircoal behavior you should expect. Along with OMGUS, vote hopping, and self voting.
Unvote
SErious Vote: Nag
Ooh a serious vote
ooh, you have nothing to say. IF you're going to vote me for spamming/bandwagonning which proves nothing then defend yourself. Really you're just looking more scummy.
I still haven't gotten a reasonable answer and you've shown that you can post. As you have in this thread, and you too afraid to answer my accusations. Is it because I'm right. Scummy baka Nag.
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
nagerous wrote:Fircoal wrote:@ Wicked, yes, we get the point, I'm tempted to vote you, not because of inactivity, but because you keep on saying we need to post and not bandwagon, and yet you do nothing about it. Saying shallow words like that it doesn't matter how much you post. You aren't getting anything done. Maybe you should bring up something for better yet you can comment on the scummy thing Nag did that he still has ignored.![]()
@ NagFircoal wrote:nagerous wrote:Fircoal wrote:nagerous wrote:Unvote...
This is silly
Vote Fircoal
Lets use some common sense eh?
huh? I was, what I was doing was blatant bandwagonning. Voting for no reason other then bandwagonning. You know me well enough this is the type of Fircoal behavior you should expect. Along with OMGUS, vote hopping, and self voting.
Unvote
SErious Vote: Nag
Ooh a serious vote
ooh, you have nothing to say. IF you're going to vote me for spamming/bandwagonning which proves nothing then defend yourself. Really you're just looking more scummy.
I still haven't gotten a reasonable answer and you've shown that you can post. As you have in this thread, and you too afraid to answer my accusations. Is it because I'm right. Scummy baka Nag.
Fir.... don't waste your time going up this avenue. Once again this is an OMGUS vote. You should know by now that I'm one of the players that likes to get the day moving by making proper votes and getting it running. All you, the wierd one and others do is just vote on the player with the most votes the go back to submarining and not contributing. It doesn't' become random when you drop the 5th vote on someone who is contributing and hasn't dropped any scumtellss, it just becomes scummy on your point as they will be eventually forced to claim. Thats the common sense part, whilst I don't necessarily think you are scum I just voted you, so we could get this game moving more and see how it develops.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
suggs wrote:wicked wrote:FYI, I'm moving this weekend, so will only be on sporadically.
Heart-broken
Neutrino wrote:Vote: Fircoal
Since time is severely limited.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal wrote:Neutrino wrote:Vote: Fircoal
Since time is severely limited.
why are you voting me. I'm not aware I did anything scummy, or out of my behavior.
wait...
I posted non-spam on Day 1....![]()
I MUST BE SCUM!
Neutrino wrote:Fircoal wrote:Neutrino wrote:Vote: Fircoal
Since time is severely limited.
why are you voting me. I'm not aware I did anything scummy, or out of my behavior.
wait...
I posted non-spam on Day 1....![]()
I MUST BE SCUM!
Precisely.
No, as I said above, I came down on Nag's side in your little argument. If you can find me a suitable target to switch too in the distinctly limited time available I might consider letting you live...
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users