While we are on the subject, who do you think is scummier:chapcrap wrote:If only they were both town. Advocating a no lynch here is the epitome of scumminess. He should be lynched. Town gains nothing from no lynches. Especially on a day like today.Nebuchadnezer wrote:Well, maybe a no lynch is good, as it will keep two townies around. Safari can try for a save, and SPART can give us some info.
1. The person who directly advocates and votes No Lynch.
2. The person who is active enough to be reading the thread, aware a no lynch is imminent, and just sits there not trying to do anything which would prevent the no lynch.
3. The person who places their vote on a case which will not be able to achieve the necessary number of votes before the deadline. (Effectively saying that they prefer a no lynch over lynching the person who could be lynched.)