Nebuchadnezer wrote:Holy crap, spiesr...you're voting to lynch him and you can't even go back and read what he's posted? This is ridiculous. It took me 2 minutes! Talk about a lazy lynch. If this is the type of effort you're putting in...
UNVOTE
Get someone else to go along with your crappy lynch.
You need to relax. Seriously. I'm on this lynch for exactly the same reason: I don't know what on earth Spart is claiming. That's partly because he's being obtuse and partly because he outright contradicts himself. After pages of saying one thing, he says another. I think that's a perfectly good reason to lynch someone.
Interesting how your vote patterns seem to be all about you. One minute you're saying "Alright I've had enough. Let's lynch Sparta". Next, you're saying "I can't believe you'd be so lazy!" Problems I have with this:
1. Your "I give up" vote was extremely lazy itself. You stuck to your guns all day (quite aggressively, I might add), but then you just say "Eh, I'm done." Rather than keeping a strong opinion, you've opted to take the easy way out. I typically find this kind of flip strange, and for good reason, as it raises more than a few questions about your motivations. Were you actually advocating Sparta's utility? Or were you fighting for him to build rapport with town so that when he flipped you could say "I told you so"?
2. You unvote Spart because spiesr is lazy. Keep in mind, I've just explained how your vote was lazy in the first place. This unvote makes you a hypocrite in addition to being lazy. Now, continuing onward:
- You make it sound like Spiesr should know the exact post in particular that is being talked about. Spiesr had just before mentioned the sever lack of clarity in Sparta's claim. It's understandable he wouldn't get this.
- Spiesr essentially said "Prove it". Not "go find it for me", not "I don't feel like it", "prove it". "I don't believe you", he said. (Spiesr, correct me if I'm wrong. If so, disregard this point)
- What you quoted does not say what IB said it says. At least, not to my reading, which can discern any possible number of meanings to this sentence. Look:
my power is every other night i get moved around randomly with another wizard good and bad so if a deatheater tries to block us ,bus us , well any night activity i find out there roles.
Let's try to break this down and see if it is in any way coherent. (Spoilers: it isn't)
my power is every other night i get moved around randomly with another wizard good and bad
What does randomly moved around mean? You get bussed? You visit them? What? I can at least tell this is random, and I'd assume passive which, as has been mentioned many times, destroys the utility.
so if a deatheater tries to block us ,bus us ,
Who is "us"? You and the other wizard? Town in general? Does this target a collective or a single person?
well any night activity i find out there roles.
Whose roles? The other wizard's? Anyone who targets you? The collective? WHAT DOES YOUR ROLE DO?
And later he said he didn't become a Deatheater. He said he just died. THEN he said he just straight up lost. So what happens? Do you turn into a stump? What?
Now that was a bit more of an extended divergence than I would have liked, but do you see how someone would get frustrated by this? How they could be confused as to what this role actually is?
- But rather than politely picking out said post and explaining its meaning, you flip out and unvote for the most inexplicable of reasons. Your logic in this post and your post before makes no sense whatsoever.
Now I'm completely uncertain to what your motive was the entire time. You defended Spart the whole day, then gave up and voted him, then unvoted him for no real reason. It's about as comprehensible as Spart's claim itself.