Rodion wrote:How unusual, this game got serious in its 2nd post. After it got serious, some people chose to return (or rather "start" if you will) to jokevoting mode.
Regardless of how correct Catnip was in trying to make a serious case on Zimmah, since the game did get serious, I'd rather we not go back to jokevoting.
@Iron - is your vote on Catnip serious? If it is, could you please elaborate on why you think she is mafia hiding behind a newbie shield?
@Eagle - getting someone lynched is the plan, but it's not rare to see D1s end in no lynches if the players that get to claim are believed and the deadline is too short to get a new case rolling
Very unusual indeed. I LIKE IT haha. And mafia
IS strange like that, where once you get into a new phase there is no going back...
eagleblade wrote:ONE more thing. Whatever we go lets vote someone off either way. Like just force a majority basically. I might sound like a noob to mafia so someone correct me if your not suppose to do this
Yes - the day should end with at least 1 claim (if not 2 depending on the claim), and most likely a lynch. However, there is no need to rush into it, lets continue to discuss, get all players involved, and look for someone acting scummy.
Okay --- time to dive in to the thick of things here.... ---
Catnip:
Okay I will be honest... I started making this post, thinking that Catnip was completely noobish and not really understanding how things went... I was at work today and I guess misinterpreted the tones of the posts... I was just excited the game started so I was eager to jokevote... I too thought she was hiding behind the noobie shield as someone else said based upon some phrases she used and intended to vote her after this post, but I have reread them all and I do not see her as particularly scum.
After Catnips post.. Zimmah instantly responded with, "Are you serious", and catnip pretty much said yes. Zimmah responded with a picture pretty much saying "you are an idiot", and catnip came at him again.
Its peculiar how this happened, and things would have turned out much differently had Zimmah had not responded at all or brushed it off.....
Am I confident either one of them are scum? No not really.... I don't think Zimmah was necessarily wrong in reacting how he did, as others said he is normally pretty vocal and won't think twice about posting his opinion. I think this just set catnip off even more, "thinking why is he being so agressive instead of ignoring me if I am wrong?"
Well pretty much you attacked a more aggressive player, for a complete jokevote... thats why you got that response from him...
===============================================================
Okay - moving on to Eagleblade - I wasn't even going to make a comment on this... but Jonty may be on to something.....
jonty125 wrote:eagleblade wrote:but how random is random? Rodion?
Eagle, at the moment you are acting as one of the 3 - jester, lyncher, or super scum. Roles are assigned randomly, if you would like to ask the mod feel free. But can you say why you believe Rodion to be scum. This is the second post in a row you've accused Rodion of scum. If you're a daytime cop or summat we can get a doc
WHO SHOULD NOT CLAIM!! to protect you so you don't die but if you have no evidence then there is no case. And according to the laws of probability Rodion is town (yes I could the same about everyone but if you pick a random person, odds are that they are town) so at the start we can consider everyone as town and as people act scummy *cough* we change our views and lynch them. Not some random person (OK its D1 the case is often very weak but we don't just name one person i.e pcm and take them to L-2).
Here are Eagles posts so far in ordereagleblade wrote:confirmed
eagleblade wrote:catnipdreams wrote:zimmah wrote:for 3 obvious reasons:
he has 0 posts
he has a ?
he has too much 2's in his name.
and on top of that he's wild.
lol, well, I was wondering how this started;
vote zimmah, because there is no logic whatsoever in that reasoning... Unfortunately, we don't know if deuceswild222 is town or scum, because zimmah could be targeting an innocent, or, very cleverly, be targeting one of his scum buddies with a ridiculous reason, such that we are fooled into thinking deuceswild222 must be innocent...
guys look if you were to choose a killer you would choose the least likely person. The new recruit. Therefore we have to vote him!
First attack on Rodion quoting Jontys post.eagleblade wrote:jonty125 wrote:vote Rodion Because he is bound to lie like in the Nightmare Before Christmas
I believe Rodion can be another option due to his high rank. A third option would be a player who's experienced in mafia.
zero explanation hereeagleblade wrote:vote deuceswild222
Lynching is good for town, but The way we go about it is critical Lynching, just to lynch is scummy.eagleblade wrote:ONE more thing. Whatever we go lets vote someone off either way. Like just force a majority basically. I might sound like a noob to mafia so someone correct me if your not suppose to do this
I thought this post was to get Rodion to participate, but Rodion already posted at this point..eagleblade wrote:but how random is random? Rodion?
Okay RIGHT HERE Jonty makes is his post about Eagle.But then Eagle Posts thiseagleblade wrote:unvote vote Rodion
its obviously Rodion I can feel it
WTF? care to explain why you just did that AFTER Jonty just called you out?unvote vote Eagle until he at least provides an explanation