Moderator: Community Team
BGtheBrain wrote:Mr. Squirrel wrote:BGtheBrain wrote:jonty125 wrote:Mr. Squirrel wrote:I feel like I should come forward with a softclaim now, since it sort of relates to VS. My role has some killing abilities. I'm not a vig, but my action has the potential to kill. So far I haven't used it this game, but I'm not so sure how many killing roles strike would put in this game.
FOS victor until we get an official vote count.
JOAT, CPR Doctor, Inventor any others?
Scumbag
Sorry, yes Im still on that, but that was just a light hearted joke.
Could be bomb I guess. CPR doc wa the first thing that came to my mind though.
Vengeful townie also I guess
Its not a traditional role. It's kind of a shitty role and really only serves as a last-resort since it could potentially kill me too.
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
BGtheBrain wrote:Im trying to guess your role. I cant think of any more roles that have the option to kill.
Victor Sullivan wrote:Oh wait! You're wildwilliam. Okay. Hm, well, that's a shame. I guess I take back what I said! If only I could sweep away my silly posts...wildwilliam wrote:first mafia game and I died night one. man. Thanks strike. GL all.
MoB Deadly wrote:You know what.... I was on the fence on this for a while, but if VS really did kill N1 and N2, then I agree that like someone said before, there is a possibility of 3 kills per night. That is a LOT for an 18 player game in my opinion. He could be telling the truth, but the fact that he didnt hold his fire for 1 night makes me think he is a anti-town killer. Either way, by whatever magic is going on at night, our role blockers and things are doing a great job nullifying mafia kills. Why don't we let them keep their information, and let them keep blocking them, and get rid of this potential anti-town killer?
We have 3 nights and a bunch of investigative roles as well, I am sure everyone has some information that will help us narrow things down if we get into a bind tomorrow. I say:
unvote vote VS
drake_259 wrote:Agree, Vote Victor
was deciding whether or not to vote him but he seems a bit too trigger happy for someone who is at his rank.
new guy1 wrote:also he seems pretty quiet compared to the game i played with him before. he seemed to be avoiding talking in this game, so vote VS
jonty125 wrote:I don't buy VS' claim.
A SK, mafia and vig in an 18 player game too much for me
And an experienced players generally don't go vigging every night
vote VS
Victor Sullivan wrote:spiesr wrote:Well, since you have decided to claim, will you through out your character name to complete it. Can you elaborate on how you sort of "accidentally" killed wildwilliam? Next, please provide some of your thought process behind your kill choices thus far. And finally, what are these obvious reasons that you won't tell us your night 3 target, as they aren't that obvious to me...Victor Sullivan wrote:I am the town vigilante. I (somewhat accidentally) killed wildwilliam Night 1 and I killed Rodion Night 2. I won't disclose who I targeted Night 3 for obvious reasons.
Well, his name was "wildwill hickok" in the player list (strike wolf apologized - it's all good, strike ), and I couldn't remember someone of that name posting, so I thought I might as well kill an inactive than no one at all. And yes, I am aware of the fopaux of vigging someone Night 1.
-Sully
The reason his night 3 kill attempt was not successful is because he was roleblocked. Meanwhile, the mafia's own kill attempt failed, presumably due to either a doc save, or the target being bullet proof. But the only people who know who the mafia targeted last night are the mafia themselves. So, your statement is basically completely wrong.new guy1 wrote:he probably doesnt want to state who he targetted because then hes giving mafia info on who they shouldnt attack. because theres a reason they didnt die from the attack.
BGtheBrain wrote:Im trying to guess your role. I cant think of any more roles that have the option to kill.
Victor Sullivan wrote:Speaking of which, I'm not familiar with my name claim. Might he be associated with, um, cleaning, in some regard? Admittedly, I haven't been too good at being consistent with my PR, though strike seems to be lenient about it (thanks, sorry )
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
Victor Sullivan wrote:Eyuck, why did it have to be so bloody? Vote edocsil - clean it up! These directors' bodies aren't going to just get up and leave. Last time I checked, we weren't filming the next George Romero movie.
Victor Sullivan wrote:EBWOP: Conzocool is kind of a newb, so I think I can let him off the hook. Next time, though, you better watch it, or else I'll take you out with the garbage
Victor Sullivan wrote:Wait a minute - WIldWilly was an inactive! What mafia in their right mind would off an inactive? I think I'm going to put my money on a vig or SK. *shudders* Can we get a stage crew to haul this body away? Jesus...
Victor Sullivan wrote:Oh wait! You're wildwilliam. Okay. Hm, well, that's a shame. I guess I take back what I said! If only I could sweep away my silly posts...wildwilliam wrote:first mafia game and I died night one. man. Thanks strike. GL all.
Victor Sullivan wrote:*Wipes off edocsil's makeup, tosses him in the dumpster, then washes his wands*
Well, it's not mafia, but scum all the same! Hopefully the night will be just as successful. Fingers crossed, pupils dilated, and Swiffers swept.
I haven't seen Taxi Driver, and apparently neither has Victor, so can someone with more knowledge and less crazy than me let me know if this PR would make any amount of sense for this character?Victor Sullivan wrote:Relax, Conzocool, someone just simply took you too seriously when he should have.Conzocool wrote:Ok, I'll be serious from here on out. Sorry, it's in my nature.Haha, yeah. Nagerous been slackin' on laundry duty. I think drunkmonkey's still wearing the same pair of boxers he soiled himself in earlier.safariguy5 wrote:I think nag should bother frenchie to come and replace him.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Hello everyone!
I am sorry, but I request being replaced. I'm not sure if I'll have time to play this game. Sorry strike
Have fun
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
spiesr wrote:Scouring through Victor's posts in this game the following six posts contain vague references to cleaning that could be part of this PR that Sully is now vaguely claiming. These are 6 of the 22 posts he made after the game began, and before he stated that he has a PR.Victor Sullivan wrote:Eyuck, why did it have to be so bloody? Vote edocsil - clean it up! These directors' bodies aren't going to just get up and leave. Last time I checked, we weren't filming the next George Romero movie.Victor Sullivan wrote:EBWOP: Conzocool is kind of a newb, so I think I can let him off the hook. Next time, though, you better watch it, or else I'll take you out with the garbageVictor Sullivan wrote:Wait a minute - WIldWilly was an inactive! What mafia in their right mind would off an inactive? I think I'm going to put my money on a vig or SK. *shudders* Can we get a stage crew to haul this body away? Jesus...Victor Sullivan wrote:Oh wait! You're wildwilliam. Okay. Hm, well, that's a shame. I guess I take back what I said! If only I could sweep away my silly posts...wildwilliam wrote:first mafia game and I died night one. man. Thanks strike. GL all.Victor Sullivan wrote:*Wipes off edocsil's makeup, tosses him in the dumpster, then washes his wands*
Well, it's not mafia, but scum all the same! Hopefully the night will be just as successful. Fingers crossed, pupils dilated, and Swiffers swept.I haven't seen Taxi Driver, and apparently neither has Victor, so can someone with more knowledge and less crazy than me let me know if this PR would make any amount of sense for this character?Victor Sullivan wrote:Relax, Conzocool, someone just simply took you too seriously when he should have.Conzocool wrote:Ok, I'll be serious from here on out. Sorry, it's in my nature.Haha, yeah. Nagerous been slackin' on laundry duty. I think drunkmonkey's still wearing the same pair of boxers he soiled himself in earlier.safariguy5 wrote:I think nag should bother frenchie to come and replace him.shieldgenerator7 wrote:Hello everyone!
I am sorry, but I request being replaced. I'm not sure if I'll have time to play this game. Sorry strike
Have fun
pmchugh wrote:If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
pancakemix wrote:First off, Travis Bickle? Town vig? Hell no. Bickle is a psychopath, not a vigilante. If he is a vig, he's overeager at best, and that just makes him dangerous.
Second, Victor's actions don't add up to being town actions, as others have stated. I don't like how you could "accidentally" vig someone N1. You just don't do anything unless, well, you're not a vig.
Third, what exactly are you trying to accomplish by pointing out everyone who's voted you? Don't say "I made a booboo and it's pretty bad" and then complain that people are voting you.
I'm not buying it. Vote VS
safariguy5 wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:spiesr wrote:Well, since you have decided to claim, will you through out your character name to complete it. Can you elaborate on how you sort of "accidentally" killed wildwilliam? Next, please provide some of your thought process behind your kill choices thus far. And finally, what are these obvious reasons that you won't tell us your night 3 target, as they aren't that obvious to me...Victor Sullivan wrote:I am the town vigilante. I (somewhat accidentally) killed wildwilliam Night 1 and I killed Rodion Night 2. I won't disclose who I targeted Night 3 for obvious reasons.
Well, his name was "wildwill hickok" in the player list (strike wolf apologized - it's all good, strike ), and I couldn't remember someone of that name posting, so I thought I might as well kill an inactive than no one at all. And yes, I am aware of the fopaux of vigging someone Night 1.
-Sully
So kill an inactive due to odd name in the signup thread? Weak logic to me, especially since this is user error more than anything. Flimsy excuse or evidence for me.
safariguy5 wrote:Also, you are reluctant to give us who you targeted last night and why. If you have a possible lead, why not let us hear it? This evasiveness paints you not as a town vig (who's been minimally helpful at best) but as some sort of SKer to me.
pancakemix wrote:First off, Travis Bickle? Town vig? Hell no. Bickle is a psychopath, not a vigilante. If he is a vig, he's overeager at best, and that just makes him dangerous.
pancakemix wrote:Second, Victor's actions don't add up to being town actions, as others have stated. I don't like how you could "accidentally" vig someone N1. You just don't do anything unless, well, you're not a vig.
pancakemix wrote:Third, what exactly are you trying to accomplish by pointing out everyone who's voted you? Don't say "I made a booboo and it's pretty bad" and then complain that people are voting you.
safariguy5 wrote:On the off chance that Sully indeed is a Vig, how useful is that role at this point in the game? Assuming he was being truthful about his kills, it's a spotty record at best. And I'm not seeing too many more opportunities for vig kills right now. I'd rather eliminate a possible nightkill on town now than have to deal with more bad kills in the future.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users