Moderator: Community Team
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Interesting. If I wasn't fairly confident in your townness I might actually have to call bullshit on this with it just being a clever method of trying to cover your ass after dropping a weak case that began to backlash. But, that isn't the case I guess...Victor Sullivan wrote:I know the LAL rule, but I think the fake-case on drake has effectively served its purpose, despite my poor execution of it. I've known drake to be innocent for awhile now; I won't go into further detail aside from he's not a power role. Knowing this, I thought a weak case on him (though risky and perhaps a bit convoluted) would out a scum or two. It seems it may have.
drunkmonkey wrote:I would beg for the deadline to be extended until we hear from the inactives, such as djfireside & C9. And not just a "I'm here, and I'll post later", like C9's last post. I'd like everyone to chip in before we're forced to lynch someone on 3 votes again.
spiesr wrote:Interesting. If I wasn't fairly confident in your townness I might actually have to call bullshit on this with it just being a clever method of trying to cover your ass after dropping a weak case that began to backlash. But, that isn't the case I guess...Victor Sullivan wrote:I know the LAL rule, but I think the fake-case on drake has effectively served its purpose, despite my poor execution of it. I've known drake to be innocent for awhile now; I won't go into further detail aside from he's not a power role. Knowing this, I thought a weak case on him (though risky and perhaps a bit convoluted) would out a scum or two. It seems it may have.
BGtheBrain wrote:@DrunkMonkey the concerns against Shield have been posted mostly on page 42.
Victor Sullivan wrote:I know the LAL rule, but I think the fake-case on drake has effectively served its purpose, despite my poor execution of it.
unvote vote shieldgenerator7
I've known drake to be innocent for awhile now; I won't go into further detail aside from he's not a power role. Knowing this, I thought a weak case on him (though risky and perhaps a bit convoluted) would out a scum or two. It seems it may have.
-Sully
BGtheBrain wrote:drunkmonkey wrote:From this, I read that VS made a weak case against drake to see if any scum would bandwagon on it, right? Didn't shield do the opposite of that?
No one really said anything useful except people seemed to question WTF VS was talking about.
Shield then says VS is being scummy, votes for him, and tries to explain how he could be mafia.
This was AFTER I stated I can only enhance pure of heart people. I dont mind skimming too much, but considering I mentioned this in the post where I roleclaimed, I would think that would've deserved a little more attention while reading and wouldnt have been overlooked.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
spiesr wrote:Hey, did MobDeadly ever state which game he is from?
dazza2008 wrote:shieldgenerator7 wrote:Listen! I never said it was powerful. I simply said it would not benefit the town for me to use it in my opinion.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:MOB you know why we can't direct our fellow townies into players via the thread. It's dangerous because we don't know what kind of interferences might happen, plus if the mafia know who the doc is protecting they'll know not to target that person.
The problem that I immediately see is that BGtheBrain claimed to be an Item Enhancer. I know that there are role's in this game whose power's are not tied to items, and if Dazza's claim is true he would most likely be among them. So BGtheBrain would not succeed at enhancing Dazza even if his claim is true.MoB Deadly wrote:I don't want BG dying because I want to get to the bottom of the dazza case. I actually think BGs power wont work because I have a feeling dazza is not town. If im wrong then dazzas power is enhanced, and maybe now it will be something useful, as dazza says right now its not beneficial for town.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Smells like Ocarina of Time, and given that the scene where you helped / kill himself stated that your Link was younger than his, it is one of the few options that would make sense.MoB Deadly wrote:I have no idea, I guess thats why I had so much speculation against PCM. My picture looks pretty normal that you would see in games. Nothing noticable. Only evidence I have is that I was raised in the Kokiri forest by the Great Deku Tree..... Hope thats helpful, Ive played many zelda games and I don't think that's ever happened.
Don't want to rain on your parade here guys, but since the potion Link appeared to have lost his item in the Night 2 scene, we may not even have a functioning doctor at this point...shieldgenerator7 wrote:yes, MOB it ensures that BG stays alive. But the thing is we would still lose a townnie, and the point of having a doc is to keep from having a townie killed. So if the mafia know who not to target there will most likely be a mafia kill tonight, but you're right, it would mean BG stays safe. Chance for no kills versus making sure BG is safe...
spiesr wrote:The problem that I immediately see is that BGtheBrain claimed to be an Item Enhancer. I know that there are role's in this game whose power's are not tied to items, and if Dazza's claim is true he would most likely be among them. So BGtheBrain would not succeed at enhancing Dazza even if his claim is true.MoB Deadly wrote:I don't want BG dying because I want to get to the bottom of the dazza case. I actually think BGs power wont work because I have a feeling dazza is not town. If im wrong then dazzas power is enhanced, and maybe now it will be something useful, as dazza says right now its not beneficial for town.
Hang on, I was under the impression that we had come to the conclusion the nagerous had been the one to give Victor his item. But looking back, I now that Victor found that nagerous targeted Hensow night 1. (Could this somehow explain how nagerous later had Hensow's item when he died?) So, does this mean there are 2 item gifters or I am as confused as I think I am?Victor Sullivan wrote:I consulted my Ocarina PM (can you believe I saved it? ) again.
Yes, I did receive it right before the end of N1, and I received it from an old man (not this one, mind you ). According to the PM I go back in time then track. So it all depends if the roleblock blocks my going back in time, or my tracking.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users