Moderator: Community Team
thehippo8 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:thehippo8 wrote:Yes, agreed ...unvote sparticus
Im curious for your reasons for unvoting.
General lack of interest in the sparticus case. Also the inceased pressure on me. I thought it easier I keep out of the sparticus case (for now at least) and see whether there becomes a more suitable case. I understand people not liking my jumping between things and hippos have a degree of impatience so its a deeply ingrained character traitFor what its worth I've been softclaiming for ages but it's dawned on me that the majority aren't that up with the character in the Deathly Hallows enough for that so I'm going a softly softly for a while. It's against my personal character but maybe its time I listened rather than spoke for a while!!
jonty125 wrote:I think we should save hippo for D2, and lynch spartacus today, because hippo's vote does seem to hop about more than usual but spartacus denied his own claim which is a greater offense in my ideas.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:jonty125 wrote:I think we should save hippo for D2, and lynch spartacus today, because hippo's vote does seem to hop about more than usual but spartacus denied his own claim which is a greater offense in my ideas.
This. I mean I've never seen so many town who are willing to give someone who can't keep their own role straight such a high benefit of the doubt.
Iron Butterfly wrote:strike wolf wrote:jonty125 wrote:I think we should save hippo for D2, and lynch spartacus today, because hippo's vote does seem to hop about more than usual but spartacus denied his own claim which is a greater offense in my ideas.
This. I mean I've never seen so many town who are willing to give someone who can't keep their own role straight such a high benefit of the doubt.
I understand and hear you. For me the reason is that if he is innocent mafia knows he is innocent and smell blood. I would be less then honest if I were to say I have not been torn. BUT I have also been in the position he has been in in making a huge error in gameplay knowing I am innocent...that combined with the way certian players such as Dazza have jumped in to lynch after sunmarining only to disappear again makeses me side toward giving him the benifit of the doubt.
Could I be wrong? Yes.
chapcrap wrote:safariguy5 wrote:Conversely, Moody might make a very good vigilante or perhaps bulletproof role.
Except for he died...
I think there is too much that doesn't add up with SPART's claim. His actions before the claim were scummy enough, but Tonks was definitely not an Animagus. She could change her hair color. Could she be a commuter role? Maybe, but not with the described information.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
strike wolf wrote:two wrongs don't make a right.
dazza2008 wrote:It actually makes me believe Sparticus less. He knows it is against the rules to do it so any scum could say the same in a last effort to look really townish.
There is nothing that you can do without violating the bold part of rule 2.SPARTACUS1974 wrote:even if this me proving my innocence ?strike wolf wrote:two wrongs don't make a right.
Any attempt to do anything like what you appear to be proposing would result in a mod-kill. Ans since you would be doing it with full knowledge that it is against the rules it would also likely lead to a blacklist.freezie wrote:2. You ARE allowed to quote the GREEN part of your role pm if you so choose to. You cannot quote anything else in your pm, nor your win condition, how many words are in it or any other genius way to get around it. You can still claim normally if you choose to, aswell. Which way you choose to do it, be very careful when you claim in this game.
SPARTACUS1974 wrote:ok i wont then but its pissing me off that the mistake in my role is the final nail in my coffin , i just wanted to try to clear my name
dazza2008 wrote:SPARTACUS1974 wrote:ok i wont then but its pissing me off that the mistake in my role is the final nail in my coffin , i just wanted to try to clear my name
The reason I voted you was for saying you were a commuter then saying you were not a commuter. Just made it all look a wee bit fake claimy in my opinion.
safariguy5 wrote:dazza2008 wrote:SPARTACUS1974 wrote:ok i wont then but its pissing me off that the mistake in my role is the final nail in my coffin , i just wanted to try to clear my name
The reason I voted you was for saying you were a commuter then saying you were not a commuter. Just made it all look a wee bit fake claimy in my opinion.
This.
Also, you never explained whether you were a regular commuter or not. Can you commute every night or every other night or x times per game? Are you immune to all night actions or just kills?
You've both denied the commuter claim and not fully elucidated the claim either. Clarifying what exactly you are would be great.
And also, now that you're claimed, the claim basically makes you a slightly harder to lynch VT. Not a particularly useful role, and the risk/reward analysis makes me more willing to lynch you because the potential loss to town of a claimed commuter is pretty low, especially considering you'd be low on the mafia kill target anyways.
dazza2008 wrote:SPARTACUS1974 wrote:ok i wont then but its pissing me off that the mistake in my role is the final nail in my coffin , i just wanted to try to clear my name
The reason I voted you was for saying you were a commuter then saying you were not a commuter. Just made it all look a wee bit fake claimy in my opinion.
Djfireside wrote:For some reason I tend to believe you and I want to go back, AGAIN! and read on hippo. I was all set on Spart but for some reason I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt as you seem to be grasping at straws and flailing wildly. You have a stay of vote from me for about 10 minutes unless I can find something else.
As for claiming your WC, that may set you free in more ways than 1. Claiming it would probabally Mod Kill you so I wouldnt do that.
everywhere116 wrote:Excuse me while I hit my head with a hammer.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users