ghostly447 wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:Testing a claim by lynch isn't actually testing it.
To test it, one would come to a conclusion regarding whether or not the claim is to be believed IN ORDER TO ACT UPON THAT INFORMATION.
While you are correct that it is a test since we will know whether or not he is scum by lynching, you are missing out on the whole in order to act upon that information. We can't make a decision whether or not to lynch him based on what happened when we lynched him.
You are the one that headed this case if I do recall. That is not out of your nature in my past experience with you. What is however put of your nature in my past experience is your leniency to his claim. You pressured him to the point of a claim and then backed off with nearly no deeper analyzing. It just so happens you are one of the potential five I planned to dog up stuff on once I get on a computer.
I will post more of substance tommorow of I can. For now I will be pretty much inactive besides maybe 1 or 2 more posts. For now we return to the cliff hanger :p
Ok, so my past nature is that I do not lead cases or that I do not unvote?
What would you classify as deeper analyzing?
Also, you are accusing me of starting a case on something and then backing off. I never voted for clever in the first place and defended him against... who? oh right, it was ghostly. So now you are actually completely fabricating stuff in order to try to build a case against me.
Furthermore, you need to explain what you mean by: "clever claims well and is immediately cleared". What does that mean and what are the implications?
Yet another ghostly on doomyoshi case. If this isn't a lyncher I don't know what is.
vote ghostly.
Also, FOS strike.
I don't have time to go into details now, but there have been a few slip-ups which put me on guard. The information gleaned from the night scene is my main focus here. Basically, I don't understand how you made those assumptions.