1. Ultra is pressured until he softclaims to be more than a vote
2. Ultra finally comes out and claims lover/mason
3. Zivel claims to be in a different lover pair where both are confirmed town
4. Dd comes out in yet another lover pair, thinks ultra scummy and zivel towny
5. Dd makes a "list post" in which he doesn't realize that crazymilkshake has been replaced (also ponders if all lovers are town)
6. Zivel doesn't think dd should've claimed
7. Streaker isn't sure what to think. Says first it is bad town for dd to claim, but then again maybe not
8. Zivel confirms that he started the game as a non-vanilla lover (as well as his partner), also regretful for calling out dd
9. Zivel repeats that they are confirmed town and believes that other pairs would have same guarantee
10. Virus is ultra's lover. Also claims that mod confirmed both to be town
11. Virus again says that mod confirmed both to be town, this time says it occurred in QT
12. After strike poses options, virus doesn't think both die at a time
(Do I have that all correct?)
So that gives us (if all are telling the truth)
1. ultra and virus as confirmed town to each other
2. zivel and player X as confirmed town to each other
3. dd and player Y have not yet said to be confirmed town to each other
I agree with strike. There is still too much left unknown to leave the claimed lovers totally and begin a different direction.
A few questions:
1. @ultra- You claimed to be a mason along with a lover. That is like a double scum safeclaim. (Assuming I understand mason correctly, where they can talk with other masons at night and return scum when investigated) Virus claiming to be your partner does give a little credibility because I do doubt there would be a scum lover pair. (but there could be for balance, to even out with two town lover pairs) Could you explain your mason role? Because you should already be able to talk to virus, do you recruit people into another chat or is virus your mason partner?
2. @dd- Did you get this same mod confirmation for you and your partner being both town aligned?
3. @everyone- Do we want to assume there are only the three pairs, or should we ask all to come forward now or never? It seems at this point, the further it goes along the easier it would be for a scum to come forward as another lover when questioned and be able to say all the things that the exposed lovers have said.
4. @all lovers- Do you know if you die together or not? Or would you just assume because of what the role is?
virus90 wrote:and dont you think thats a bit to easy for mafia? lets assume that there are 3 lovers. and 1 of them is mafia. 2 kills --> 4 town deaths for that reason a mislynch on one out of 6 lovers -> 2 deaths.
6/17 (or more) are lovers. this game would go south pretty quickly then.
This logic is why I tend to believe one of the lover pairs (or even just one lover) could be scum. To balance it a little bit without really compromising the common perception of the role (that they die together). Wouldn't it be terribly OP for all 6 (or more) lovers to be town, know that the other is town for sure, not die together, and have an additional PR?
I really doubt that all of these are the case unless the scum faction is quite large (5-6) and has multiple KP.