Moderator: Community Team
StorrZerg wrote:I scum hunt. Which you 100% consider luck or not a real skill.
I'm putting up this god like defense because I'm town. I'm not going to be that town that didn't fight hard enough to not be lynched.
I've presented reasonable ways for people to verify my role. It's most likely not lylo, what do you lose in letting me try to prove myself tonight.
You are either so mafia that you want this lynch to happen so you don't have to read others today, or you are so hung up with how drastically different I play that your policy dictates that you have to tunnel and lynch me. Either way you are playing terrible. Refusing to see reason, refusing to even consider another lynch.
Metsfanmax wrote:StorrZerg wrote:I scum hunt. Which you 100% consider luck or not a real skill.
If that's all you're about, then you failed miserably on D1, so why should I care about your opinion?
did I fail to keep the pressure on virus. Yes. Did I sniff him out, set him on his heals, force him to claim. Yes. Relentless pressure for 5 days.I'm putting up this god like defense because I'm town. I'm not going to be that town that didn't fight hard enough to not be lynched.
Why? If you're town, then you know the game is about town winning. Not about you staying alive.
my win con is to eliminate all threats to town. Letting myself be lynched is against my win con.I've presented reasonable ways for people to verify my role. It's most likely not lylo, what do you lose in letting me try to prove myself tonight.
You actually haven't presented a single way for anyone to verify your role. All you have discussed is what would happen if you were watching someone who died. If your information never shows up in the scene, then you can just say that you were watching someone else. The only thing we could hope to try is to tell you exactly who to watch every night, and then hope (?) that this person gets NK'ed by the mafia so that we can pick one out. Which obviously would not work because then mafia would just NK someone else to avoid getting found out.You are either so mafia that you want this lynch to happen so you don't have to read others today, or you are so hung up with how drastically different I play that your policy dictates that you have to tunnel and lynch me. Either way you are playing terrible. Refusing to see reason, refusing to even consider another lynch.
Really now? I was the one at the start of this day saying that we need to take this slow, and consider everything. I was hoping that we'd have discussion about these other things. I'm the one who has refused to actually vote so far, to ensure that we have enough time to talk about others. And yet you're saying that I'm the one refusing to consider another lynch. This game has some of the worst argumentation I've seen in a long time in mafia.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
jonty125 wrote:A couple of questions Storr.
You targetted yourself N1, does that mean if you die on any night information on the killer will show up in the day post? Or is it one night only you have to target the soon to be deceased on the same night as there death?
Also, do you have any idea what information you would receive?
jonty125 wrote:Storr, you're at L-2, it's very unlikely people are going to unvote, until you claim. Also Storr, I disagree with you claiming town creds because tambo thought you were town because he had a "town mindset", that doesn't mean he's infallible and also that Newbie Mafia, there were lots of players there with town mindsets, and yet the mafia weren't lynched. Also, the I'd never kill Tambo, doesn't do anything for me, it sounds like the kind of thing I hear when I play mafia with my mates and the lynch is based on weak cases and it's all a laugh and a joke.
In reference to me putting Storr @ L-1L-2/L-1 are very similar IB at this stage of the game we're not at LYLO, if someone had speed-hammered Storr after his claim - then we would have an easy D3 suspect.IB wrote:you just don't jump in and put someone at L1 before they claim. That has been CC mafia protocol forever.
So, if L1 and L-2 are basicly the same, then why take the chance for a quick lynch to happen? If someone hammered there, an entire day would be wasted whatever Storr would flip. Even if he would flip mafia it denies town an entire day of discussions.
Do I honestly believe you[Storr] were protecting virus? At the end of D1, yes. If you want me to give some reads Storr, you're probably gonna be disappointed but I like to keep everyone close or on neutral, unless they do extreme things (as that way I can try to keep an open mind)
So I currently see pcm & mets, as leaning slightly town, that D1 argument smelt town on town but it could verily easily not have been. And everyone else I'm keeping at neutral.
I was about to write a post to support your Town Role and focus on jonty when I re read the night scene and Hotshots death registered.
You actually haven't presented a single way for anyone to verify your role. All you have discussed is what would happen if you were watching someone who died. If your information never shows up in the scene, then you can just say that you were watching someone else. The only thing we could hope to try is to tell you exactly who to watch every night, and then hope (?) that this person gets NK'ed by the mafia so that we can pick one out. Which obviously would not work because then mafia would just NK someone else to avoid getting found out.
Really now? I was the one at the start of this day saying that we need to take this slow, and consider everything. I was hoping that we'd have discussion about these other things. I'm the one who has refused to actually vote so far, to ensure that we have enough time to talk about others. And yet you're saying that I'm the one refusing to consider another lynch. This game has some of the worst argumentation I've seen in a long time in mafia.
StorrZerg wrote:WRECKED METS AND IRON
And honestly if i did get it right and pick the right townie, i would be 100% confirmed
Another thing, TAMBO ROLE BLOCKED SOMEONE. no one is claiming it. THERE is a strong chance that who ever got role blocked is TOWN. i have no idea why no one is commenting on people being role blocked.
You are not even considering another possible mafia at this point, when there has to clearly be another mafia
This is clearly, if ever, fishing.
Metsfanmax wrote:StorrZerg wrote:WRECKED METS AND IRON
...strike's point proved exactly what was I was talking about. We have zero proof that your role is actually what you say it is. In fact, the comment about mafia fake claims is even more damning to your point because now it says you might have been confirming how your fake claim works rather than your actual role.And honestly if i did get it right and pick the right townie, i would be 100% confirmed
Sure, but the odds are small, it doesn't make sense to leave you alive on this off-chance if I already think you are most likely scum.
Metsfanmax wrote:Sorry, pushed submit before I got the rest of my thoughts in.Another thing, TAMBO ROLE BLOCKED SOMEONE. no one is claiming it. THERE is a strong chance that who ever got role blocked is TOWN. i have no idea why no one is commenting on people being role blocked.
If I were town and got roleblocked, I wouldn't necessarily confirm it. Not sure what there is to learn by the fact that no one admitted they got blocked.
Everyone has a role. So in my view its not bad. If we had VT's in the game, sure it's bad cause you confirm you have a role. This isn't the case, so its information. 2 kills happened in the night. If 2 people claimed to be role blocked, and someone has evidence other wise we could trap someone.You are not even considering another possible mafia at this point, when there has to clearly be another mafia
You are the only person who believes this, I'm pretty sure. There's zero evidence for it. Let's move on.
Please present a case on someone else that isn't me. I eagerly await to hear it. If you all ready presented a reasonable case, just say who it was on and i will re look at it.
Streaker: your case on jonty isn't fully convincing. For example,This is clearly, if ever, fishing.
I would want to know the same thing. If it were true, we could lynch storr with less risk, for example. Also, Storr has been giving away plenty of information on his own this day.
This is certainly an idea I have heard before, but haven't seen used nearly enough to call it a standard. Most of the time games have enough theme derived flavor that the murder weapon is whatever fits with the character.Iron Butterfly wrote:It is standard play here at CC that mafia shoots and serial killers chop or kill.
Generally lynching a town player is not an action in the town's favor. I don't think we are yet at the point where the only realistic options are he gets lynched today or there is no lynch today and he gets lynched tomorrow. Although we might end up there before too long, in which case I hope Storr realises it and does the right thing.Metsfanmax wrote:Why? If you're town, then you know the game is about town winning. Not about you staying alive.I'm putting up this god like defense because I'm town. I'm not going to be that town that didn't fight hard enough to not be lynched.
If we had a person with a Vig action that we trusted (or wanted to test?) we could have that person execute somebody who we would otherwise just lynch and have Stor watch the target. That would mostly confirm both of them. (Although we would have to hope that mafia don't have a roleblocker, busdriver, or something else to mess it up.)Metsfanmax wrote:You actually haven't presented a single way for anyone to verify your role. All you have discussed is what would happen if you were watching someone who died. If your information never shows up in the scene, then you can just say that you were watching someone else. The only thing we could hope to try is to tell you exactly who to watch every night, and then hope (?) that this person gets NK'ed by the mafia so that we can pick one out. Which obviously would not work because then mafia would just NK someone else to avoid getting found out.
I don't know about you, but I have always considered it only appropriate for role claims to contain all the information about the role and answer any question anybody might have so that everybody fully understands what is being claimed. I picture somebody being forced to claim as the town revoking their privilege to have secret information. After all, if all the information about the claim is not on the table, or if somebody does not understand it, how are we supposed to evaluate if we believe the claim or not?Streaker wrote:This is clearly, if ever, fishing. If I was mafia, I would want to know exactly this. Storr also already noticed this on his next post. ''Can we kill you this night, Storr, without giving information to town?'' ''Or do we go for someone else''?jonty125 wrote:A couple of questions Storr.
You targetted yourself N1, does that mean if you die on any night information on the killer will show up in the day post? Or is it one night only you have to target the soon to be deceased on the same night as there death?
Also, do you have any idea what information you would receive?
If that is the case why are you not advocating lynching him for lying?Streaker wrote:I'd also like to add that I am sure Storr did not use his power on himself, explanation of this will follow when I get a mail back from our mod. I asked him a few things to confirm before I can say more.
In my experience in most games players are not notified that they were blocked unless they used an action that returns a result from the mod. So it is possible that whoever got blocked doesn't know. I am not sure what you want to discuss here, we don't know who he targeted and whoever he hit might not know either. Unless you want to speculate about who his likely targets would have been?StorrZerg wrote:Another thing, TAMBO ROLE BLOCKED SOMEONE. no one is claiming it. THERE is a strong chance that who ever got role blocked is TOWN. i have no idea why no one is commenting on people being role blocked.
StorrZerg wrote:No the post proves that i wasn't doing anything wrong. You stated i should be mod killed for bringing up what i did. I do not have a fake claim, striker had to say what he did exactly the way he did it to give no hint as to my alignment. If he leaves out the mafia section, that could be interpreted as a mod hinting i'm town, most likely on accident. The fact that you are trying to bring some illusion that what striker said has any affiliation to my alignment is pretty bogus. It clearly does not state "i might have been confirming how my fake claim works" You are putting words in the mods mouth with that kind of statement. A mod has to keep the information unbiased, to say that he is leaning one way on how he gave the information regarding my alignment is a bad argument. Hell most of this information that strike has given isn't anything new, its very common information if you remembered from Breaking bad. (mafia having fake claims, striker not giving hints or clues in flavor of the game)
Also another note, Streaker says he is sure i didn't watch myself. Are you the least bit curious to that statement? Why are you not questioning him more on it. Wouldn't evidence of me not being on myself be damning?
In fact, I said the opposite: it means we can't know your alignment
In fact, the comment about mafia fake claims is even more damning to your point because now it says you might have been confirming how your fake claim works rather than your actual role.
StorrZerg wrote:Says balance not alignment.
Also you're skirting with a mod killable offense. Saying that the mod has confirmed that this is how your role works confirms that you do actually have this role, which is information you cannot post.
Also every single person who has stated "well i was about to back off you and push XX or maybe push someone else" only to have in the same post "but you just did this / i found this" so i'm going to stay. (which include IRON, streaker, mets, pcm.) forgive me if you didn't do exactly this, but i'm calling out 4 people right now with similar behavior to my lynch.
I'm putting up this god like defense
Baahhhhhh bahhhhh
did I fail to keep the pressure on virus. Yes. Did I sniff him out, set him on his heals, force him to claim. Yes. Relentless pressure for 5 days.
WRECKED METS AND IRON
Streaker wrote:Storr, honestly, if you play the game like this then you simply invite this kind of attention. Though you did get the job done on D1. EVERYONE SAYING STORR WAS NOT THE MAIN INSTIGATOR FOR D1 MAFFIA LYNCH NEEDS TO REREAD, NOW.
Mets, I can see and understand a lot (though not all) of your argumentation you bring up. I also have the feeling that this is mostly due the the way Storr plays so agresso. Do you honestly believe Storr would go hunting on D1 like that on his scummate?
Now, in my mind I don't exclude that play, so Storr could very well still be mafia. I will not vote for him now because I give him credit for his D1 hunt.
Streaker wrote:This is clearly, if ever, fishing. If I was mafia, I would want to know exactly this. Storr also already noticed this on his next post. ''Can we kill you this night, Storr, without giving information to town?'' ''Or do we go for someone else''
StorrZerg wrote:##unvote
##Vote Jonty125
I've presented my case on him as well.
You stated i should be mod killed for bringing up what i did.
Please present a case on someone else that isn't me. I eagerly await to hear it. If you all ready presented a reasonable case, just say who it was on and i will re look at it.
My role can and will be confirmed by the mod pending if i get a correct watch on someone who dies.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
StorrZerg wrote:Also make note, IRON said he was going to look someplace besides me, BUT found evidence in the day post to suggest sk. now that this has been proven false, he needs to back up his claim imo of looking some place else.I was about to write a post to support your Town Role and focus on jonty when I re read the night scene and Hotshots death registered.
pancakemix wrote:StorrZerg wrote:Says balance not alignment.
Meaning that alignments are assigned without regard for it.
no that is an assumption you are making. It doesn't state "roles got handed out regardless of alignment" It states "roles handed out regardless of balance. He very well and most likely made roles specifically for certain alignments. If the setup was roles indeterminate of alignment there would be no need for fake claims.Also you're skirting with a mod killable offense. Saying that the mod has confirmed that this is how your role works confirms that you do actually have this role, which is information you cannot post.
I know this has been gone over, but it's really only a killable offense if he quotes it directly. That said, appealing to authority like that is a bastard move on his part.
sorry you need to rephrase that statement because you are incorrect. Regarding "mod stuff" I was representing what a mod confirmed post on day would be like, and how irons interpretation was wrong. My appeal to the mod was to shut people up regarding "use day posts flavor as evidence on setup" That is hardly a "bastard" move to get people on the right track, and stop confusion. Its the same with if i asked the mod in general "do anti town have fake claims" He would most likely respond in the game "yes anti town have fake claims" Did i rub it in peoples face? Yes. Was i gloating a ltitle? Sure. What i did was a bastard move, is bullshit. It was very important that irons post about flavor got put down, because it was spreading miss information.Also every single person who has stated "well i was about to back off you and push XX or maybe push someone else" only to have in the same post "but you just did this / i found this" so i'm going to stay. (which include IRON, streaker, mets, pcm.) forgive me if you didn't do exactly this, but i'm calling out 4 people right now with similar behavior to my lynch.
I actually don't recall making that claim. All I said was that your claim is probably true (I reserve the right to presume it false for the sake of argument), but that it's moot because it could be aligned either way. My arguments about your behavior (which you admit makes you look anti-town) still stand."Wait, you're giving up? I'm legitimately on the fence here about your claim, but I have some doubts about your actions and your role. You could answer those questions and maybe sway me but if you're content to be lynched, I'm content to leave my vote where it is."
yeah, you hadn't agreed to back off, but you make it appear as you are seriously considering it. And if you are, there is absoulty no reason you need to keep pressuring me. Why? because the majority of the people in this game are. You could be trying to read other people, giving more insight to the game on others, or presenting a new case on a different person. Pressuring multiple people at once is not scummy.
Secondly, my behavior is not alignment indicative. I'm frustrated for good reason. I get abrasive, and mean and aggressive. This isn't your first time playing with me, And if you recall i had people calling me out (mets specifically) who wanted to lynch me over behavior and not because they thought i was mafia.
Maybe it will help if i describe how i am feeling right now. So i wake up, see my favorite player dead. That sucks. I make some posts, see some 2 vote pressure go to sleep. I wake up to 4 people voting me and wanting me dead. It has now been 4 days, of relentless people pushing on me. yes i think relentless is the right word. Every time i try to defend i get countered. I bring up what i did to virus for the first 5 days. it doesn't matter to some people. I bring how i tried to gather town together to get a lynch. people deny that i had any effect on them on their choice. I bring up meta, how it could be used to possibly defend myself. I get attack for bringing up meta. Someone re reads the day post, and now thinks my claim is scummy because they read into flavor when flavor is just flavor. I mean.. the list just goes on and on. I get pissed, i get upset. Nothing i do seems to be good enough. Playing the game by giving reads on other people isn't good enough. explaining my view point on who is town and who is scum. Doesn't mean anything. And all the while, we have james who is sitting at 2 posts per 7 days. And this is acceptable to some people. We have mets, who on nearly ever other player who has had an case brought up, strikes it down for being silly. yet, with all the cases thrown at me he has never said a single one was silly or bad.I'm putting up this god like defense
If you describe anything you do as "god-like" you may want to reconsider your adjectives, honestly.
I'm serious. I really feel i'm doing my damn best that i can to prove my innocence, my town alignment, and push the game forward in a good direction.Baahhhhhh bahhhhh
Because being a dick will keep you from getting lynched. You heard it here, folks.
Sure, mocking and being a dick isn't going to help me.did I fail to keep the pressure on virus. Yes. Did I sniff him out, set him on his heals, force him to claim. Yes. Relentless pressure for 5 days.
But you failed to close, and closing is everything. The fact that you backed off so easily sets off red flags. Making the conservative play on virus in that scenario doesn't fit your MO, either. You found that claim believable when no one else did, and continually gave him the benefit of the doubt for a good while, and even after it was clear that virus was gonna get lynched you waited to the wire. That doesn't sound like the ruthless scumhunter you make yourself out to be.
I disagree that closing is everything. I set town on the right track to lynch mafia even if i failed to follow through. If i hadn't placed the effort to rout him out from his little hole. we very may have lynched someone else that was town. Or had a no lynch. If i had backed off the first time mets said my case was silly, or when james and jonty started to pressure me, virus just gets lost. I dont' see you or mets going onto virus if he hadn't of claimed. I don't see Jonty going on virus with out that claim...
I found that claim provable via policy, along with my role being able to check. The that mets decided it was policy to lynch him because he didn't want to deal with a question mark.
As far as waiting, I know he is in a different country, on a different time zone. What difference did 6 hours make? What if he was town, and made 1 final post that damned a mafia? There are a lot of variables that could have happened. I was set to hammer him.Streaker wrote:Storr, honestly, if you play the game like this then you simply invite this kind of attention. Though you did get the job done on D1. EVERYONE SAYING STORR WAS NOT THE MAIN INSTIGATOR FOR D1 MAFFIA LYNCH NEEDS TO REREAD, NOW.
Mets, I can see and understand a lot (though not all) of your argumentation you bring up. I also have the feeling that this is mostly due the the way Storr plays so agresso. Do you honestly believe Storr would go hunting on D1 like that on his scummate?
Occam's razor. The simplest solution is the most likely solution. You have 2 sides to the story. The town storr, who pushes virus for most of the day, and reconsiders virus over policy, and his role. (but wont let a no lynch happen) or the mafia storr, who pushes on his mafia team mate and forces him to claim. Then tries to save him in a very small amount of time. All the while has the plan, with his power role to prove his innocence.
As for mafia, After everyone started re voting him, and how clear it is that he is 99% going to be the lynch woudln't i revote, disregard dj and gain super mega town points that could be ridden till the end of the game. I do make mistakes regardless of alignment. But i assure you, i wouldn't falter this hard as mafia when pushing a team mate.
Now, in my mind I don't exclude that play, so Storr could very well still be mafia. I will not vote for him now because I give him credit for his D1 hunt.
A grand total of zero people are now going back to reread D1. The point is that he did NOT get the job done, and very publicly so. I think you're missing the crux of this whole debate.
I don't think he is. I think he sees the reality of the situation. That or he is mafia and prepping early for day 3, to go haha nanana boo boo i was right about storr. (I believe the first, because i have a town read on him.)Streaker wrote:This is clearly, if ever, fishing. If I was mafia, I would want to know exactly this. Storr also already noticed this on his next post. ''Can we kill you this night, Storr, without giving information to town?'' ''Or do we go for someone else''
Uh, no. Once a claim's out, it's out. He has to define it completely or it wouldn't be credible. Mafia know that there's a threat anyway, and if it's credible there's just as much chance that a doc would protect him as there is to encounter his power in the pool of remaining players.
So i answered this before but ill answer it again. I did define my role for 1 of his questions. (it was answered) As for the question if my power stays on someone. I very specifically would have mentioned if it was true. A person with a "killing" mindset wants to know the answer to that kind of question.StorrZerg wrote:##unvote
##Vote Jonty125
I've presented my case on him as well.
Oh look, an out!
Its hardly an out while im still at L-2. I would need 4 people to vote him, you should consider since streaker hasn't actually voted jonty. So most likely nothing will come from this pressure, since its an illusion. Not until enough pressure is brought off me, would any person be scared of being lynched today. hence with no pressure, they are welcome to lurk as much as they want and not contribute. Case and point jonty and james.You stated i should be mod killed for bringing up what i did.
No, he said you were skirting the line between a modkill and no modkill. And really, it's still a bastard play.
Again, mets did not read the exchange between myself and iron correctly. I was clearly pointing out what mod confirmed information would look like in a day post, and that irons theory about a confirmed SK in the game based off hotshot dieing to an axe was wrong. After being called out, is when i asked the mod to confirm i hadn't done anything wrong, and to confirm that flavor is flavor.Please present a case on someone else that isn't me. I eagerly await to hear it. If you all ready presented a reasonable case, just say who it was on and i will re look at it.
The irony of you complaining that no one will talk about anyone else while you're on the precipice of being lynched is palpable.
I'd be happy to stop my bitching, if there was some help in moving the game forward.My role can and will be confirmed by the mod pending if i get a correct watch on someone who dies.
If enlarged to scale. Seriously, asking for that much rope is preposterous. If I believe your claim is true, but your alignment is false, then for sure you're not going to get a correct read and if you did, it wouldn't matter because you're scum and I shouldn't give you that chance (and that's assuming that this claim isn't a fake). Even if I buy that you're town, I can't trust that you'd get a correct read just on probability, and if your thought process is typically similar to "I pushed a scum so I'm gonna get killed" (which translates as "I'm gonna get killed because I'm me") then your perspective is so stilted that it's worthless.
Its no different than being a doctor that asks to be given the chance to make a save. Or being a watcher or tracker... I was told i hadn't said a way i could be proved. I know its not a good chance to be proven in 1 night. Yet this is a chance. LOL. i have no reason to watch myself tonight. TO many people want to kill me. My action will be going out tonight, and it can be tracked, I can be watched. I can be verified.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users