![Brick wall ](*,)](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
Moderator: Community Team
everywhere116 wrote:Vote Count 1
jak111: 1 (codierose)
codierose: 2 (wildwilliam, jgordon)
Leehar: 2 (safariguy, skillfusniper)
jgordon: 1 (jak111)
Not Voting: 4 (MoB Deadly, sparticus, dazza2008, Leehar)
With 10 alive it takes 6 to lynch. Deadline is 4:00 ConqST Friday.
codierose wrote:everywhere116 wrote:Vote Count 1
jak111: 1 (codierose)
codierose: 2 (wildwilliam, jgordon)
Leehar: 2 (safariguy, skillfusniper)
jgordon: 1 (jak111)
Not Voting: 4 (MoB Deadly, sparticus, dazza2008, Leehar)
With 10 alive it takes 6 to lynch. Deadline is 4:00 ConqST Friday.
hey everywhere any chance you can post what roles the scum and third party have they know our roles but we have no clue what there are once we are dead
everywhere116 wrote:codierose wrote:everywhere116 wrote:Vote Count 1
jak111: 1 (codierose)
codierose: 2 (wildwilliam, jgordon)
Leehar: 2 (safariguy, skillfusniper)
jgordon: 1 (jak111)
Not Voting: 4 (MoB Deadly, sparticus, dazza2008, Leehar)
With 10 alive it takes 6 to lynch. Deadline is 4:00 ConqST Friday.
hey everywhere any chance you can post what roles the scum and third party have they know our roles but we have no clue what there are once we are dead
Nobody knows anyone else's roles. I'm not quite sure where you're getting this from.
codierose wrote:thats it abilities the bad buys know they have got a mayor watcher etc we don't know nothing
codierose wrote:was hoping mob dazza or sparta was going to add something to the claims they haven't so guessing thats guilt for now and leehar tried to put something together didn't quite work
so im going with you safari unvote vote leehar
codierose wrote:not asking for claim just some arguments against the claims that has been said i actually agree with you somewhat but why would the scum target me last night if jak is telling the truth. Thing is nobody has come out and pressured his claim and said he is lying so at this moment there must be some truth in what he's saying which leads to the 5 left of which some must be scum
safariguy5 wrote:God damn, you guys post a lot.
First, @ Leehar, using "town" and "mafia" labels in this game is confusing because the Mafia here are the town faction (Think of the Godfather movies). So the cops are the scum faction.
Secondly, WIFOMing what roles might be town or not is really weak. I've seen scum doctors for goodness sake. I agree, certain roles are more balanced in one side or the other, but I'm not going to make judgments based on one thing or another. You really haven't said anything that would deflect my suspicions of you, and considering the first thing you did was OMGUS me, that doesn't really help your case. So my vote stays.
jgordon1111 wrote:It was N2 codie, are you saying you did nothing. That in itself is odd considering this is mafia games and unless your vanilla then you most likely had a night action.
And again you deflected the question. But I will help You out, if you answer my question first truthfully, I will then tell you what I did on N2.
Now that sounds reasonable doesnt it. No more back and forth.
Leehar wrote:safariguy5 wrote:God damn, you guys post a lot.
First, @ Leehar, using "town" and "mafia" labels in this game is confusing because the Mafia here are the town faction (Think of the Godfather movies). So the cops are the scum faction.
Secondly, WIFOMing what roles might be town or not is really weak. I've seen scum doctors for goodness sake. I agree, certain roles are more balanced in one side or the other, but I'm not going to make judgments based on one thing or another. You really haven't said anything that would deflect my suspicions of you, and considering the first thing you did was OMGUS me, that doesn't really help your case. So my vote stays.
And I'm saying you Omgus'd me? I picked you out for partly submarining on day 2. You're a vastly experienced Mafia member, so there's no doubt you can assist more, but you only made three posts within those days? Your subsequent talk after this quote also supports that, since you explained relatively clearly what was going on in a 3/4 page back and forth between the relevant parties?
So yeah, even if you claimed, you never actually explained this soft submarining of yours, wherein you just pop in to direct a bandwagon on other inactive members and thereby pretending to be active and influential when in actuality this post of yours is probably only the second of substance (with the other being a claim I'm still doubtful of since I haven't seen it's like previously, tho admittedly in a relatively short experience) in over 25 pages of input seems scummy when past precedence suggests you could contribute so much more? (I know there's another name for the argument I'm posing but can't remember it)
Again, omgus'ing me when you seemingly omgus'd yourself first seems weird, specially when it's with the same argument you used for your 2 previous cases (In your words "flying under the radar"? When I thoroughly believe I haven't!)
safariguy5 wrote:I'd like everyone to notice however, that instead of offering an alternative to vote for or bringing out a new case, Leehar is instead trying to attack me instead.
codierose wrote:leehar L2 getting time for a claim
Users browsing this forum: No registered users