Sorry, but the game grew about 8 pages within 48 hours of my last post and it was hard to keep up with this pace.
Anyway, we have 3 claims:
Zimmah - Rambo, town tracker -> Flores visited Victor
Conzocool - Alien guy, town jailkeeper ->jailkept Edocsil
BGtheBrain - Egon, inventor (I don't think he ever mentioned the "town" part) -> Jonty is clean (@BG: does that equal an innocent cop result? Please ask Strike Wolf and be sure to tell us before D2 ends)
As far as acting scummy goes, other than Zimmah and Conzocool my main suspicions lie in Safariguy5. His D1 Drunkmonkey wagon was totally uncharacteristic. For those of you who don't know Safari's town MO, when he doesn't have a legit case he defaults to pressuring inactives (inactive mafia are hard to catch because they don't scumtell and inactive town are detrimental because they don't help achieve lynches and sometimes do not use their night actions). I've never seen Safari hop on a jokewagon and try to get a claim out of it like he did on this game. Add to that the fact that the deadline was far from being reached (we had about a week to find a legit case) and you can understand why his pressure was so unwarranted and uncharacteristic.
Moreover, his first D2 post presented a flawed reasoning for voting BG:
safariguy5 wrote:As for the secondary case on BG vs Mr. S, I feel that Mr. S has a point. When you vote for someone, you need to attach some reasoning, so that screenshot was appropriate during the original vote BG, not after the fact.
vote BG
This is particularly fishy because BG's vote on Blake was awful. His reasoning of pushing an inactive few hours short of the deadline and hoping that 8 other people would join him to get a lynch before Blake could claim and that by doing so he'd catch scum (either in Blake or in other people due to the analysis of their vote patterns) was SO flawed that he could easily be the target of votes and more votes with those voters not really needing to elaborate a lot on why they decided to vote BG. However, instead of saying how BG's reasoning was flawed, Safari decided to say that BG's screenshot (which proved that his 1-line vote on Blake had a previous reasoning, a reasoning that - albeit flawed - was presented 5 minutes before his vote) was
formally invalid and that the correct action would have been to repeat what he had said 5 minutes before and only then cast the vote. And since the screenshot was posted "after the fact", he went to voting BG.
Had those actions come from a less experienced player, we could argue that a FOS would be best suited to the proportion of the gaffes, but coming from someone as experienced as Safari it is hard to conceive him sharing a town alignmen at this point in the game.
Unvote, vote safariguy5.