TA1LGUNN3R wrote:hmm... the flavor spec seems to fit for both characters, so it's probable one of them is lying (jonty vs Saf)...
So for jonty, if I assume he is mafia....
jonty wrote:I counted Victor twice unvote vote Violet
inactive BW...
jonty125 wrote:unvote I'm happy with Vio has now proved her abilities
chapcrap wrote:edocsil wrote:Vote Count
safariguy (1) - chapcrap
chapcrap (1) -PCM
jonty (4) - conzo, MeDeFe, Violet, ???
Violet (4) - safariguy, victor, strike wolf, jonty
11 alive, 6 to lynch
It appears that Vio is cleared...However, I thought that I had voted for Vio... No big deal.
Since jonty has 4 votes, perhaps we could hear from him?
Lets have a breakdown on the votes on me
1.
Conzocool wrote:Hmmmm...
unvote vote Sully unvote revote Jonty! for swearing to an unknown god!
Jokevote
2.
MeDeFe wrote:unvote
vote jonty for apparently not counting correctly
Jokevote
3 and 4.
VioIet wrote:Vote Jonty
The next vote count should include two votes for jonty- one from me, and one from ???
Proving her role
So two jokevotes, and Vio proving her role. I believe that says it all.
A legitimate defense post, against someone who was dropping scumtells.
jonty125 wrote:chapcrap wrote:About jonty:
I already explained this before. We were pressuring Vio because of supposed inactiveness at other times in mafia and on the site as a whole. With that as the predecessor, I saw no reason to not pressure jonty into a claim since we were basically just pressuring for no reason anyway.
The reason why we pressure an inactive is because they are no help to town because a) harder to get a lynch and b) don't hear their view and can't get scumtells
I thought you would have known this and are dropping scumtells left and right
unvote vote chapcrap
This one's harder. He did vote for a townie, as did I, who later turned out to be the doc. If he were scum he would know this. However, chap was playing poorly. Too wifom for anything concrete.
That would be a gutsy move if you were mafia and I believe it unvote
Backs off the doc... sensible for any player.
I aren't going to vote no lynch because finishing the day early is of no value to town as people may still drop scumtells or voting patterns for D2.
jonty125 wrote:Victor Sullivan wrote:Yeah, I'm certainly would not support another wagon today. We've already pushed our boundaries too far for Day 1 as it is.
-Sully
+1
Says he won't vote no lynch, but endorses Victor's post that he won't support another wagon. Again, nothing damning, considering the doc had just been outed.
I'm not thinking he's scummy right now, based purely on these posts. Then again, this could just be solid play. I'll compare to Saf next (too tired atm).
One thing that has been bothering me is the kill on chap... Were the mafia really so desperate to be rid of him, or did they conclude a watcher not likely? Obviously they achieved the kill, but I personally may have waited a day or two, just to rule out the possibility of watchers. idk, I tend to be overly cautious. This leads me to question either players' motive; they both have solid-ish claims, but one of them had to have been responsible for the kill or known about it. I guess I'll wait for jonty's response.
-Tails
I think I'm getting to the tail end of it though so should be able to add in a day or two.
