Iliad wrote:I was sure I voted rodion.
unvote vote Rodion.
I haven't even heard from Rodion since my post, don't see him exactly rushing to disprove my argument.
Be careful what you wish for!
Iliad wrote:1)Rolefishing (obviously)Revealing your mason partner is a very last ditch move to prove your innocence, not the scenario in which sg7/leitz was in. Leitz's bandwagon was mostly developed as joke wagon, but came close to lynching when due to his lurking. It was a fairly typical day case, half accidental and half pressure applied to create discussion. Shieldgenerator was not in a position where he had to give up his mason partner's identity, nor is that the typical procession. Usually if town still is skeptical of the claim, the mason partner also comes out and confirms the mason' claim. Before any discussion developed, while sg was still vulnerable
Rodion outright intimidated him into giving up his masonRodion wrote:The only way of confirming your claim is by having your partner exposed, so I guess that will be necessary.
Rodion is well aware of sg's status as a new player and this is fairly textbook manipulation of an inexperienced player as well rolefishing.
Mistake 1 - you're forcing to say I "outright intimidated" Shield. My first posts when dealing with someone are usually calm and nice and I only get to actual threatening when they start denying my requests. Would I have eventually intimidated Shield in naming his partner? Undoubtedly. Did I outright intimidat him in the quote above? Certainly not.
Mistake 2 - obvious lie. Shield is older than me as a mafia player.
Iliad wrote:Rodion wrote:Going to sleep now. In case I'm still alive tomorrow, I'll be using numbers and logic to show why this post from Edoc is biased and wrong.
With more to be discussed and no deadline yet implemented, I guess you know what a speedlynch should mean in terms of D2 leads.
The first sentence to me clearly screams; guys, let me just have anotehr day or so to figure out how to explain all of this away.
The second is a usual attempt to indimidate the town into submission, by exaggerating the the negative effects of your lynch.
3 - Click on my profile. Check my country. Research my timezone. You should have no trouble concluding that it was really late when I posted that. The reason I didn't post earlier was not "needing time to come up with something", but "needing sleep". The idea of the numbers to refute Edocsil were already in my mind before I went to sleep (thus the post).
4 - You're wrong again. Town has no reason to cut discussion short by quickhammering if there is no pressing deadline. The more discussion, the merrier. I merely implied that a quickhammer should be interpreted as scummy because town would get no benefit out of it. This is why I voted VS earlier (for pressuring for that quickhammer after it was implied that it wasn't good for town). A great way of finding scum is seeing who quickhammers town power roles (I did that in Terminator, Edocsil did that in Actors) before everything that had to be said was in fact said. By saying what I said, I merely guaranteed that:
a) I was living to explain why the accusation was wrong
b) the quickhammer would be heavily scrutinized the next day, meaning we'd lynch scum or a really stupid townie (and it's not my fault if townies are stupid and put themselves into bad positions)
Iliad wrote:Rodion's justification is impressively mathematical but utterly irrelevant. It's Rodion attempting to again frame the discussion into a way which would be beneficial to him. Of course in a situation with 5 people, 2 of which scum, you would need to have the mason's claim. It's a LYLO for christ' sake and I'm cynical enough to believe that Rodion knew this and conveniently adopted the scenario. In Rodion's lynchpin 'logical' justification the outing of masons would be not be desirable but necessary instead as well as everyone's claims. In this scenario the town's fate would basically solely rest on whether this claim was true, and whether the town thought it was true.
5 - It works in other situations as well, I just picked the "magnifying glass" situation to make it more obvious.
Iliad wrote:2) Logical inconsistencyIt is the nature of the game, especially on day 1, that town player screw up and give off scum tells. Based on the severity and consequences of this mistake as well as the experience and expected playing ability of the player, these may be excused or forgiven. But a very important thing to note is that Rodion has stuck to his guns and tried to argue that he did rolefish, but it was beneficial for town.
These reasons, or excuses depending on the way you look at it, I'm finding to be pretty flimsy. Most damning however is that it' clear that Rodion himself doesn' believe them, a major red flag.
Observe
1) Rodion has not decided a compromising road, rather agressively justifying outing a town role, fairly typical for his playing style
2) He has displayed an immense displeasure at claiming himself, rather antagonistically.
Rodion wrote:
Way to play like a bunch of retards.
Oh, name's Venser, town jailor (jailkeeper).
For all his posturing and number crunching, Rodion is showing here that he, apparently a town player, understandably does not wish to have his role outed. Not so understandable is his continued insistence that outing edocsil was a positive action for town.
Rodion's justifications are flimsy with good reason, he's adopting them to try and save his own hide.
6 - This is not a logical inconsistency, it's a difference of perspective. By asking Shield to out his partner, I could be catching scum and doing town good. Why? Because I didn't have 100% certainty that Shield was town. Why should I be mad at claiming myself? Because I have 100% certainty I am town. This is also why I somehow relate to Edocsil's wrath.
Iliad wrote:This is Rodion trzing to subtly mentor his relatively inexperienced scumbuddy, Rodion offering direct advice to iron and not simple general advice. Also consider Rodion's adversial and agressive style adopted towards everyone, contrasted by his rather warm attitude.
7 - I'm usually agressive towards people that vote for me for dumb reasons. Also, you severely insult me by thinking I'd treat a scumbuddy in obvious contrast as to how I treat everyone else in the game.
Alright, you asked, I answered. Now it's time to admit you were wrong and say your vote still stands just because.