jak111 wrote:You do realise, whoever activated this clock thing tried to have me KILLED, right? It was just fortunate that enough people unvoted me before that.
You do realize that, when this clock dude sent his PM to PCM (I'm assuming that is what happened), he could have counted the votes to see whether you'd die or live, right?
Sure, but it's better to pick one theory and stick to it for the night for me. Otherwise my targets are endless to look at.
You do realize you make no sense here, right? Unless you think one of the people voting you are scum...which would be consistent with your OMGUS style of play for today...your theory doesn't really narrow anything down. Chances are someone wanted you to live...ever think of that? Which brings in all kinds of interesting theories about why...but I wouldn't hang my hat on that theory either...
Ah interesting.... So it appears that I am unfortunately stuck into voting no lynch. I am pretty sure this is just how anark is, but I will always find it scummy when a player reacts that much to a little bit of pressure. And it rubs me the wrong way when his post is mostly about how the other person needs to calm down when in fact he appears the angry one. I my experience, playing does become less fun when you are a target (even a minor one) but both jak and anark have acted like they have something to hide from their actions of anger when just a couple posts were directed act them (and screaming tunneling)
So I'm not sure that I truly believe these are scum tells, or if they just rubs me the wrong way, probably the latter
@doomyoshi, yes I must have confused flavor and alignment, if flavor isn't alignment, what is it? @everyone, I am sorry for my condescending tone
And I find it strange that this person would decide to end the day with a three way tie. Why not wait to see if one person took the lead or no lynch was no longer an option? Hindsight tells us that anark would have taken the vote lead soon after, so it bears to question if this person was attempting to protect anark
Rodion wrote:I could only eliminate Jonty and Jmac.
Virus, if you're an unusual town role (something we won't understand upon seeing you flip), would you mind explaining what you could do (or could have done)?
not sure if allowed. if so i could..
As far as I know, you are alive until your death scene is posted... so you can claim and give your opinions until then. The mod didn't say you were dead... he just said you were without a horse and you would be dead at the end of the day, which hasn't happened yet. I think you can even vote in the runoff.
Well, it looks like the results of the runoff will be either a no-lynch, a nark lynch, or a jak lynch, as no-one else has even been under discussion really. Ignoring his usual rants, I get more of a town vibe from nark, and a lot more of a scum vibe from jak (for the previously stated reasons, and his posts today haven't made him look any better either.) I am about 50-50 still whether to lynch jak or no-lynch... so since we can't change our votes once they are made I'll wait another couple hours for my final decision.
Well I probably won't be voting as it doesn't look like there's enough people who want it to get a Jak lynch going even with Jonty's mistake so please let me know if I am wrong. Will be here until deadline.
Iliad wrote:The upside of calling everyone scum and making 1000 predictions is that statistically you should get a few right.
So... Would you like to point out the question here? Because I don't see one...
Why are you pushing me so hard? All you have is a bunch of WIFOM and the fact that OHMIGOD real life is more important to me than this game. You have been very aggressive toward me, demeaning to me, and I frankly don't think that I have done anything to earn your ire. You then talk down to me as if I haven't been participating or like I don't know what I am talking about, but you said answer your question and THERE ISN'T ONE...
How about you quit being a fucking dick and actually make a true point? I have done NOTHING in this game aside from think that not knowing the rules is idiotic... Tell me how else I have been so bad? By having real life come up? By not having posted ANYWHERE on the boards during those times, and having to quickly make moves on my cell phone?
I really don't see where 1) the rage and anger and demeaning attitude you have toward me is coming from 2) why you think what I did was so scummy to begin with
Then I thought about it. You have been super aggressive at me only after I said something to Spiesr... After that, it was all hands on deck against me. In my opinion, that makes an easy choice... You and Spiesr are a team. Because there is NO other logical reason for you to become so obsessed and belligerent.
So, I will say this, make a real point or back off... Ask a real question or go jack it on a street corner in San Diego... Because I have done nothing wrong and I don't intend as a player or a person to put up with your attitude. This is a game and is supposed to be fun for us... Everyone, not just you... Now make a case or unvote...
Lastly, my bolded part of your comment- which is in the spoilers- sending in Dr. Evil would NOT GRANT YOU SCUM... How dare you even say that. Because that means you are saying that PCM lied and would not RANDOMLY ASSIGN ALIGNMENTS... Which YOU would know if you read the rules... So, again, your arguments are meaningless and void of points, just easily dismissable WIFOM and anger.
So, get your panties out of the twist.. .Take a breath and remember, it's just a game... But know the rules of the game you are playing.
-Danny
LOL!
Anyone else and I would lynch this poster with fire! So much Appeal to... well pretty much everything, emotion, fear, it's got it all.
But since it's Nark is just makes me
Jak I am kind of meh on but I am sure enough crazy shit will go down during the night that lynching a very incomplete case is a bad idea.
vote no lynch
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
strike wolf wrote:Well I probably won't be voting as it doesn't look like there's enough people who want it to get a Jak lynch going even with Jonty's mistake so please let me know if I am wrong. Will be here until deadline.
I think his posts are scummy. I don't know his meta and others are saying that this is what he does. But I am not a big fan of a no lynch and so I will VOTE: Jak111
strike wolf wrote:Well I probably won't be voting as it doesn't look like there's enough people who want it to get a Jak lynch going even with Jonty's mistake so please let me know if I am wrong. Will be here until deadline.
I think his posts are scummy. I don't know his meta and others are saying that this is what he does. But I am not a big fan of a no lynch and so I will VOTE: Jak111
You do realise someone is already being "lynched" so to speak today with virus dying by that horse game correct?
Highest Rank: Major:2157
"All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers"
This is why Mafia failed two years ago, and it's failing now.
People, if you are gonna sign up, fucking play... PLAY. It doesn't take but five minutes a day to catch up on any single game. You spend that much time playing your games, so why not play mafia? Why sign up and then leave?
You all sit around and bitch and complain about playing and the way people jump on your bandwagons, but you sure as f*ck don;t have the time to care to play! So WHY DO IT?
I submarine, but it's on purpose
I will give you 3 guesses as to whose quote this is.
This is why Mafia failed two years ago, and it's failing now.
People, if you are gonna sign up, fucking play... PLAY. It doesn't take but five minutes a day to catch up on any single game. You spend that much time playing your games, so why not play mafia? Why sign up and then leave?
You all sit around and bitch and complain about playing and the way people jump on your bandwagons, but you sure as f*ck don;t have the time to care to play! So WHY DO IT?
I submarine, but it's on purpose
I will give you 3 guesses as to whose quote this is.
So your voting someone because they are a self righteous hypocritical whiner?
Nark's appeal to emotion didn't sit right with me. Moreso since he has ranted against specifically his own behavior. I wouldn't say "self-righteous" or "whiner" but there is some hypocrisy here. I am betting SK.
I will vote no lynch. We're already losing one player who is giving some pretty townie vibes off to me, no reason to lynch Jak currently. Maybe if we get some information from the night, we can take another look at him tomorrow.
Rodion wrote:Jmac1026 - Last visited:Tue May 13, 2014 5:44 pm - CLEARED
I do so like being cleared of things. FINALLY MY INACTIVITY PAYS OFF.
This is why Mafia failed two years ago, and it's failing now.
People, if you are gonna sign up, fucking play... PLAY. It doesn't take but five minutes a day to catch up on any single game. You spend that much time playing your games, so why not play mafia? Why sign up and then leave?
You all sit around and bitch and complain about playing and the way people jump on your bandwagons, but you sure as f*ck don;t have the time to care to play! So WHY DO IT?
I submarine, but it's on purpose
I will give you 3 guesses as to whose quote this is.
Where is this post from?
You linking this here and using it as part of your case really does seem right?
It appears to me that you are trying very hard to fabricate a case against nark here based on personal dislike and very little logic.
This is why Mafia failed two years ago, and it's failing now.
People, if you are gonna sign up, fucking play... PLAY. It doesn't take but five minutes a day to catch up on any single game. You spend that much time playing your games, so why not play mafia? Why sign up and then leave?
You all sit around and bitch and complain about playing and the way people jump on your bandwagons, but you sure as f*ck don;t have the time to care to play! So WHY DO IT?
I submarine, but it's on purpose
I will give you 3 guesses as to whose quote this is.
Where is this post from?
You linking this here and using it as part of your case really does seem right?
It appears to me that you are trying very hard to fabricate a case against nark here based on personal dislike and very little logic.
FP by Jmac
At least we know Anarkistsdream hasn't changed his meta!
DoomYoshi wrote:Nark's appeal to emotion didn't sit right with me. Moreso since he has ranted against specifically his own behavior. I wouldn't say "self-righteous" or "whiner" but there is some hypocrisy here. I am betting SK.
You are alive for another 9 hours lol
