virus90 wrote:Ok. we need some action guys, not gonna catch the badguy if no one says anything. so lets get the discussion going again?
I wont vote yet because with the risk of mtamburini (or someone else) joining and if i am wrong the mafia bandwagoning to get the majority vote in. it would mean a quick kill.
But: TWO... you were in no lynch camp, are not saying much and did not vote epic pie... if i had to vote now, it would be pretty easy...
and james time to take some stances my man, no vote on lynch, no vote on epic. just wanted to point that out.
as colored in blue, even before IB voted for you i already pointed out that i was doubting you. Wanted some answers. IB having the same feeling about that for me was another signal to keep pushing.
JamesKer1 wrote:However virus, you seem a little "jumpy" in your ideas... Why didn't you see a case against me before? It took IB to bring one up to get you to come to a "realization" on it... I know I played a lot like that in my second game, so since you are new I'll stick with a FOS... However, I'm getting a whole lot more from IB
what exactly do you mean by "getting a whole lot more from IB" might be the language but not sure how to interpret. get more reasons from IB or get more scum feeling? or something else altogether?
But if you want my line of reasoning i sure have one.
When rereading the forums it just strikes me that with most major situations you are always one of the last ones to take a stance, or post a "valuable"reply, if any of these at all. by valuable i mean; a reply with opinion/information on that topic.
Lynch no lynch: No stance, if you read the posts i would say favor no lynch. (page 4 onwards (7?)
vote epic pie because inactive: no comment. (page 4/5)
roleblocker = mafia: okay got to give you that. (page
(false) Vote gregwolf: no comment (9)
do i trust gregwolf being a cop: no comment (9/10)
JamesKer1 wrote:However, I am now also leaning towards TWO, and wondering where pie went. TWO seems to be hyperposting one page, then disappearing for a few. He played the exact same way in a game he just turned up scum in. Maybe it's his playing style as we'll, hard to tell at this point, but I think it's "scum style".
page 12
You mention both but focus on two.
I am pointing out the role blocker situation, which lead to epic pie being voted for scum (page 13): you did react, but not on this topic. you voted mtam, pretty random after what i just said. could even see this as a diversion if you want to. try to stop it before it gets rolling. what happen next was that greg, IB and then me voted, mtam finished the job. you only reacted after this happened. so once again to conclude: no comment, or if you want to see it very negative: even diverting attention.
what brings us to what happened in day 2: IB votes you; you vote him. and we have the discussion we are having now.
So this is my line of reasoning and writing this i am only confirming my suspicion. so lets put my vote to it:
Vote JamesI hope i am right but if i am wrong, and we kill a towny. i am first of all sorry, but looking at the bright side: we end up with 3 guys, if i would survive the night i would rather not see one of them being you since that would make my decision harder then when it was one of the other guys. since i prefer to get through the night with people higher on my "trust list", thus making it easier to find the last goon, if we haven't lynched him today.
thats it for now, looking forward to the next part of the discussion.