Well I have looked through the thread and I have a couple of comments to make. I hope that the lot of you find them revealing. First of all I would like to point the fingers at two spefic players. Let's start with you Butterfly of Iron.
I have noticed that you have been voted on quite heavily recently. First of all I would like to say that I agree with this position and where it not for the Butterfly of Iron being so close to being lynched I would be voting for him myself. HEre is what I want to point out:
Iron Butterfly wrote:dazza2008 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:dazza2008 wrote:So you never noticed on your role pm?
Of course I noticed my role pm and its color.
You did not answer my question. Answering my question with a question avoids and deflects my original question on the situation.
You either believe a made an honest mistake OR you believe I had some strategy in mind.
I don't believe that there are just these 2 option. You could be anything. You could be a third party. I will say that I do not think you are extremely stupid because clearly you are not but I can't say that you seem town to me. Surely you can see why what you did is making some of us suspicious of you?
The suspicion is on me simply and solely because I got the colors wrong in my very first statement. I have explained why.
Besides the color mixup I want you to explain how I have not "seemed" like town. I made a mistake and have spent the entire time since that first post explaining what happened.
So explain how town is suppose to act in this situation.
More important no one has been able to explain how my initial statement/question would help my faction in any way.if I was Winter it does not help. If I am Summer it does not help. If I am third party it does not help.
Stubbs just conveniently jumped the bandwagon with no comment whatsoever.
Butterfly of Iron, I think you are misunderstanding just what is the problem here. You are trying to ask us what good would this do for your faction, and you claim no matter what faction you are it does no good for you. However that isn't even the right question to be asking. They are two questions to be asking. Why would you post something about the colors? And what did YOUR POST do to help your faction? Let's look over the post again:
Iron Butterfly wrote:The game is Summer vs Winter. Winter did the killing so I assume they are mafia (red). Why would a Summer VT be orange?? Could it be that Summer has a cult leader that must recruit Summer VTs?
While there is a problem that you are unable to see that the VT should be an orange color (this should be obvious from the start) but rather the words that you put with it. You don't ask why the VT is orange. You postulate that BECAUSE the VT is orange they could be a cult. These two are very different questions. One of them is just trying to get information out there, which I agree wouldn't do much for any faction because everyone knows it. However the assumption that you tried to make could potentially help out certain factions. If it weren't for the fact that no one went with it.
Imagine this scenario: No one knows that you are lying and try go with you. What does this mean? This puts the shift of the factions. Suddenly this VT that might be a cult or something seems much more lynchable. Not only that but it throws doubt into the whole game. Basically you but the Summer faction into the roll of the bad guy. Now who would this benefit. I think it's easy to see who would gain from that. Not only is it misdirection (wonderful for mafia), it is misdirection in the form of being out other targets that could be town. If you truely did not know about the colors it is very possible that THIS was what you were trying to go far. Now tell me, Butterfly of Iron, how pro-town of an action is that?
The next of you is Mr. Safariguy. You were the first person to bring this game out of the joke vote stage. You posted the game changing post right here:
safariguy5 wrote:Iron Butterfly wrote:Hensow wrote:In my book the amount of time befor my first post is about as good as any reson you'll have on day one
And you are saying??.....
Again with the whole "wait until a case is presented by someone else". If you're mafia, that's a perfect way to not draw attention to yourself because the more you talk the more likely you are to make a mistake/draw a cop investigation on yourself.
Pretty sure I'm already voting him but just in case (and seriously this time)
unvote vote Hensow
There are a couple of problems I find here. The first of which is I'm not sure how you can even understand what he is saying. I can't really make ends or tales of something. The second of which is I don't believe Hensow is the most experienced of mafia players, unlike you Mr. Safariguy. I think there is probably good reason for him to believe that day 1 won't go anywhere. I have played with many players who thought the same and that didn't make them scum or not scum. However your twisting of his words and wrapping them in the shape of a good early bandwagon is somewhat suspicious. Let's not forget that there are other ways of enacting the same strategy you accused him to doing, such as scumarining. But of course no one would scumarine in this game.
Wait there were at least 10 prods this game?
Another interesting case is how you handled the situation with Iron Butterfly. Let's look at all of the posts you made about the situation. As one of the more active vets I expect a lot. ;3
safariguy5 wrote:skillfusniper33 wrote:The issue I have with voting him is that we have confirmed vanilla's in the game with TFO. I know it will lead to easy fake claims, but something in my gut says he isn't lying about his role. I am willing to through my gut aside if it comes to it and vote him. But with this evidence I don't really bye into it.
True, but the problem is that mafia could just as well be using the VT defense. I feel that the color mix up was not a big deal, but that IB's defense in regards to the color difference was less than convincing.
vote IB
Oh.... That's it? A bandwagon vote with no reason other than. It's mafia that could be using the VT defense? Looking at this game so far it seems there are VT's in here. It's perfectly valid to claim one, and obviously you have to have more reason to think someone is lying than being a VT. However you produce nothing. It's funny. When the deadline was coming and the case on Butterfly of Iron was mounting and the one on Hensow was falling you said nothing. Only when there was no lynch and it became the next day did you post again. Checking your profile does point to the idea that you were not posting on the forum then, but you were at least checking some of your risk games. So the jury is out there. Interesting though because it could have been a pivotal moment, much more important than the lazy time you added onto the bandwagon now. You have only done so when it was safe and ignored the case. At the same time you posted tidbits on other players that had little suspicious of information being traded. It seems that after your case of Hensow fizzled out you have taken your car and cruised it behind the rest of them blending in with the crowd. Furthermore, you seem to point pressure away from Butterfly of Iron with trivial distractions.
On that note. I will:
Vote: Safariguy5