LSU Tiger Josh wrote:It was addressed to you.
If you feel I'm scum go ahead and vote me. I led the lynch against what is a known scum while you didn't participate in it. That would just make me all the more suspicious of you.
I've said this before and will probably have to say it again; My internet connection broke down and I didn't get it running until long after Kalish was dead.
LSU Tiger Josh wrote: It may be Skoffin's normal way, but at the same time her normal argument that I've heard before is no one is online at that time to argue points with her while that night people were available in regards to myself, Kwanton, and the late Kalish and Koeson. As such my vote on her is firmly stuck there
As far as it not making sense, it sure makes a lot more sense to me then your excuses for her not particpating in the discussion that was taking place while she was ONLINE READING THE THREAD enough to tell chad to stop spamming there. That to me is more then enough reason to give someone a vote.
This is Skoffin's problem. Argue it with her.
The vast majority of my point was directed to the fact that voting someone on playing style isn't a good idea. Your other argument for lynching Skoffin was that she must have known that Kalish was scum beforehand. Yet, the first post clearly states that the scum are nearly as much in the dark as the town is. From hints droped by the mod, it
may be that
some of the scum know the identities of other scum. This could be through some sort of investigative ability on their part, or even if they could communicate to eachother, they may have to do it anonymously, through the mod.
It's just not solid evidence. I wasn't defending her, I was questioning your reasoning.
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...
The Rogue State!