Conquer Club

Batman Mafia~~~GOTHAM WINS!!!!!!!!

Housing completed games. Come take a walk through a history of suspicion!

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby kwanton on Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:22 am

Neutrino wrote:
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Later posts hint that not all of them are in the dark about each other. Talapus has hinted that Hatter and Poison Ivy know each other, and there are possabilities that other scum could possibly know each other.


Neutrino for trying to justify scummy behavior done by another player.


[/b]


What do you mean? I was pseudo-defending her because your arguments didn't make sense (both the 'being quiet' one and the 'she knew that kalish was scum' one).

Yes, there may be connections between players, but we have no solid proof on who knows who (if anyone).


Half right. We have no idea which players are connected but we do know at least a few of them are. I'm not talking about characters (I'm well aware of poison ivy/hatter suspicions). I'm talking about players(real life counter-parts)
Click the Esoog!
Image
User avatar
Cook kwanton
 
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm

Postby LSU Tiger Josh on Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:23 am

Kalish had already given his pathetic argument against why he had voted the person that claimed cop. Kwanton was here during that time and realized it sounded really weak and pathetic posted so and even made a vote on it. Skoffin was here during that time, but did not really address it at all. Thank you for another scum showing himself to us should Skoffin prove to be scum you will be getting my next vote
LSU Tiger Josh
The man, the myth, the legend has returned.
Corporal LSU Tiger Josh
 
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Louisiana

Postby Neutrino on Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:28 am

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Kalish had already given his pathetic argument against why he had voted the person that claimed cop. Kwanton was here during that time and realized it sounded really weak and pathetic posted so and even made a vote on it. Skoffin was here during that time, but did not really address it at all. Thank you for another scum showing himself to us should Skoffin prove to be scum you will be getting my next vote


Is this adressed to me or Kwanton?

If it's to me; I was only questioning your reasons, because they didn't make much sense. You said she was scum for playing in her usual way (quietly). Please, tell us how this is a reason for a lynch? I could equally vote you for playing in your normal way (very agressively).
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...

The Rogue State!
User avatar
Corporal Neutrino
 
Posts: 2693
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.

Postby LSU Tiger Josh on Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:35 am

It was addressed to you.

If you feel I'm scum go ahead and vote me. I led the lynch against what is a known scum while you didn't participate in it. That would just make me all the more suspicious of you. It may be Skoffin's normal way, but at the same time her normal argument that I've heard before is no one is online at that time to argue points with her while that night people were available in regards to myself, Kwanton, and the late Kalish and Koeson. As such my vote on her is firmly stuck there while I'm pretty certain that you are also scum especially once we find that Skoffin is in fact scum.

As far as it not making sense, it sure makes a lot more sense to me then your excuses for her not particpating in the discussion that was taking place while she was ONLINE READING THE THREAD enough to tell chad to stop spamming there. That to me is more then enough reason to give someone a vote.
LSU Tiger Josh
The man, the myth, the legend has returned.
Corporal LSU Tiger Josh
 
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Louisiana

Postby Skittles! on Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:45 am

Unvote

Ha, Neutrino, you really are starting to look scummier and scummier.

LSU, you put good reasonings behind your vote for Skoffin, and I agree with some of them, but before I put a vote on her, I'm going to see what she says. One vote should break the shell.

But... FOS: Neutrino and Skoffin
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14574
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Postby kwanton on Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:46 am

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:It was addressed to you.

If you feel I'm scum go ahead and vote me. I led the lynch against what is a known scum while you didn't participate in it. That would just make me all the more suspicious of you. It may be Skoffin's normal way, but at the same time her normal argument that I've heard before is no one is online at that time to argue points with her while that night people were available in regards to myself, Kwanton, and the late Kalish and Koeson. As such my vote on her is firmly stuck there while I'm pretty certain that you are also scum especially once we find that Skoffin is in fact scum.

As far as it not making sense, it sure makes a lot more sense to me then your excuses for her not particpating in the discussion that was taking place while she was ONLINE READING THE THREAD enough to tell chad to stop spamming there. That to me is more then enough reason to give someone a vote.


And if skof is town should we suspect you? I'm a little suspicious of skoffin now too but neutrino does make some good points. He said that is skoffin's playing method. I haven't played enough games with her to be sure but others have confirmed this. Also, and I've seen this personally, LSU you have a very aggresive style which can also be misconstrued as scummy. Now I'm used to it and just write it off as you being you, but I swear to God one day you'll use our preconceived notions of you to screw us over. :wink: I'm just trying to say voting someone on play style doesn't look like a legit reason to me. However the fact that she did not vote kalish when she was obviously reading the thread is scummy.

Well I'm still keeping my fos on skittles! and firecoal for resons stated before. Unless I get fastposted cause this took a while to think up and write and I saw skittles! on.
Click the Esoog!
Image
User avatar
Cook kwanton
 
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm

Postby Skittles! on Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:51 am

Yes, Kwanton, I just unvoted you.

And for your information, I didn't just vote you because ML had some good reasoning, I actually put a reason. You've been acting suspicious to me, and not like being in the spotlight. You do contribute, but I still think you are suspicious, though not as suspicious as Neutrino, to me.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14574
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Postby LSU Tiger Josh on Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:54 am

If people wish to suspect me if I am wrong, then yes I deserve that. I don't have the insight of a cop, so I base it on what I see and believe. I saw Kalish act scummy by voting on the one that claimed a cop role, therefore I went for him as no real townie would do that even if they thought he was an insane cop. Skoffin's actions or should I say inactions to me are just plain scummy. She normally doesn't post a lot, but her normal excuse is just the fact that she's on when no one else is on to chat and debate on the matter. I want to say she said that in the Simpson's game. Playing style in itself would be a bad reason to vote for someone outside of day 1's random lynch or sherwood's 100+ pages on day 1 just to get mandy to shut up :) Otherwise should have some actual basis for the votes which I've since brought out other then the general overture that I was going to save and type for when I'm awake instead of half asleep making tons of typos and blending a few sentences together..
LSU Tiger Josh
The man, the myth, the legend has returned.
Corporal LSU Tiger Josh
 
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Louisiana

Postby kwanton on Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:55 am

Well I was going back to find evidence to refute skittles! claim that i avoid the spotlight and I came across a couple other interesting things instead. One:

Skoffin wrote: Ack, well seems I wasn't the only one confused. I thought Skittles was dead too.

I honestly thought I had voted yesterday before I left, I got kicked off and didn't worry about it. But since in the end more people came along it doesn't matter that much *shrugs*
Anyways for now I'm going over some things I thought suspiscious earlier, I'll add my opinions in the morning.


Could be a lie. But it sounds legit to me.

Two:
HBH voted skittles! cuz he "likes M&Ms"

I'd be more surprised if he actually had a good reason.

Anyway back to my search. Just wanted to bring those 2 things to everyone's attention.
Click the Esoog!
Image
User avatar
Cook kwanton
 
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm

Postby Neutrino on Mon Jun 25, 2007 12:57 am

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:It was addressed to you.

If you feel I'm scum go ahead and vote me. I led the lynch against what is a known scum while you didn't participate in it. That would just make me all the more suspicious of you.


I've said this before and will probably have to say it again; My internet connection broke down and I didn't get it running until long after Kalish was dead.


LSU Tiger Josh wrote: It may be Skoffin's normal way, but at the same time her normal argument that I've heard before is no one is online at that time to argue points with her while that night people were available in regards to myself, Kwanton, and the late Kalish and Koeson. As such my vote on her is firmly stuck there

As far as it not making sense, it sure makes a lot more sense to me then your excuses for her not particpating in the discussion that was taking place while she was ONLINE READING THE THREAD enough to tell chad to stop spamming there. That to me is more then enough reason to give someone a vote.


This is Skoffin's problem. Argue it with her.


The vast majority of my point was directed to the fact that voting someone on playing style isn't a good idea. Your other argument for lynching Skoffin was that she must have known that Kalish was scum beforehand. Yet, the first post clearly states that the scum are nearly as much in the dark as the town is. From hints droped by the mod, it may be that some of the scum know the identities of other scum. This could be through some sort of investigative ability on their part, or even if they could communicate to eachother, they may have to do it anonymously, through the mod.

It's just not solid evidence. I wasn't defending her, I was questioning your reasoning.
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...

The Rogue State!
User avatar
Corporal Neutrino
 
Posts: 2693
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.

Postby kwanton on Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:03 am

Skittles! wrote:Ha. Isn't just laughable? If my suspicions come out correct, then Kwanton would be Neutrino's scum buddy. Kwanton was always the one to stick low, and not to get to much in the spotlight.

Unvote
Vote: Kwanton

If Kwanton turns out scum, then I'm sure Neutrino would be scum too, as he just tried to play dumb and protected his scum buddy in one post.

Oh, and Neutrino, that question has been answered before, and with each pasting night, we get more and more clues. It's obvious that scum know each other, because in the night ends it states, occasionally, that the scum are teaming up.


Why'd you think that neutrino was my scum buddy? Care to expand on that speculation? I'll be happy to argue against any points you may have.

And you've said that I stay out of the spotlight on several occasions. Would you say I've been submarining? Cause I post. A lot. If it's cause I'm careful with my votes then I've already addressed(sp?) this. I think it's important to be careful with my votes. Check my first post defending myself for further on this topic.

Well if you think I'm not in the spotlight then put the spotlight on me. Come at me with everything you've got. Any accusations or suspicions. I'll be happy to have my 15 minutes of fame. I got nothing to hide.
Click the Esoog!
Image
User avatar
Cook kwanton
 
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm

Postby LSU Tiger Josh on Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:12 am

kwanton wrote:Well I was going back to find evidence to refute skittles! claim that i avoid the spotlight and I came across a couple other interesting things instead. One:

Skoffin wrote: Ack, well seems I wasn't the only one confused. I thought Skittles was dead too.

I honestly thought I had voted yesterday before I left, I got kicked off and didn't worry about it. But since in the end more people came along it doesn't matter that much *shrugs*
Anyways for now I'm going over some things I thought suspiscious earlier, I'll add my opinions in the morning.


Could be a lie. But it sounds legit to me.

Two:
HBH voted skittles! cuz he "likes M&Ms"

I'd be more surprised if he actually had a good reason.

Anyway back to my search. Just wanted to bring those 2 things to everyone's attention.


kwanton wrote:Well I was going back to find evidence to refute skittles! claim that i avoid the spotlight and I came across a couple other interesting things instead. One:

Skoffin wrote: Ack, well seems I wasn't the only one confused. I thought Skittles was dead too.

I honestly thought I had voted yesterday before I left, I got kicked off and didn't worry about it. But since in the end more people came along it doesn't matter that much *shrugs*
Anyways for now I'm going over some things I thought suspiscious earlier, I'll add my opinions in the morning.


Could be a lie. But it sounds legit to me.

Two:
HBH voted skittles! cuz he "likes M&Ms"

I'd be more surprised if he actually had a good reason.

Anyway back to my search. Just wanted to bring those 2 things to everyone's attention.



HBH is stuck with the role of "Fool" from what I gather. It seems to suit him fine. In regards to the statement Skoffin madet, I believe she is trying to cover her rearend up about how suspicious she looks right now in regards to her record in this game. She was here long enough to hear the pathetic reasoning that made you vote Kwanton as she last posted at 1217am CST. At 1215 am she stated "That's what I figured so I decided to wait for you, I didn't see your name anywhere so I thought you might of went offline." This tells me that she had waited for more information and STILL didn't find him scummy enough to vote for as it does not even hint at her finding his excuses pathetic or even guilty.

It's 1am here so I'm off to bed. Perhaps Skoffin will change my mind tomorrow, but at this point I find it highly unlikely as her inactions this game speak louder then what I can imagine her saying. If I do change though, my vote will go to Neutrino for the reasons I stated earlier.
LSU Tiger Josh
The man, the myth, the legend has returned.
Corporal LSU Tiger Josh
 
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Louisiana

Postby Skittles! on Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:12 am

kwanton wrote:
Skittles! wrote:Ha. Isn't just laughable? If my suspicions come out correct, then Kwanton would be Neutrino's scum buddy. Kwanton was always the one to stick low, and not to get to much in the spotlight.

Unvote
Vote: Kwanton

If Kwanton turns out scum, then I'm sure Neutrino would be scum too, as he just tried to play dumb and protected his scum buddy in one post.

Oh, and Neutrino, that question has been answered before, and with each pasting night, we get more and more clues. It's obvious that scum know each other, because in the night ends it states, occasionally, that the scum are teaming up.


Why'd you think that neutrino was my scum buddy? Care to expand on that speculation? I'll be happy to argue against any points you may have.


I thought he was your scum buddy because he was defending you in a way that looked scummy. I've also been suspicious of you for a while, too. Though, I am more suspicious of him, as he just keeps referring back to the "Talapus said this on the first page", and I'm sure some, maybe 2, mafia know who each other are.

kwanton wrote:And you've said that I stay out of the spotlight on several occasions. Would you say I've been submarining? Cause I post. A lot. If it's cause I'm careful with my votes then I've already addressed(sp?) this. I think it's important to be careful with my votes. Check my first post defending myself for further on this topic.

Well if you think I'm not in the spotlight then put the spotlight on me. Come at me with everything you've got. Any accusations or suspicions. I'll be happy to have my 15 minutes of fame. I got nothing to hide.


I don't think you've been submarining, as I said, you've been contributing and posting a lot. And what page would that be? Meaning, your first post defending yourself.

The reason why I say I think you're not in the spotlight because you're posting a lot, and being careful with everything. It just seems that you're gong under the radar, while actually not looking like you are under the radar. If that makes sense..

Oh, and Addressed is spelt correctly. :D
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14574
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Postby kwanton on Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:17 am

kwanton wrote:Hrm three people suspect me. I'm fine with that. I will be more than happy to defend myself.

ML said that I was very careful with my vote. If that was your main accusation, then I wholeheartedly agree. Not to metagame but that is just how I play. I always want to get every piece of info before I sign someone's death sentence. If someone doesn't have many votes then sure I'll throw out a vote easily to get info cause there is little danger of a major bandwagon. But if someone (like Kalish) has many people suspecting them I tend to shy away from adding one more vote to the large amount they might have.

Looks like it's my time in the spotlight. I don't mind. This is just a part of the game. Any other questions for me to field?


There I quoted for you. Meh I was actually hoping you had solid accusations against me so I could get some argument going (even if I'm on the chopping block). Well it's two here and I'm off to bed. I have suspicions of others right now but I'll figure it out when they post. I don't want to name any names though cause I want them to act normally.
Click the Esoog!
Image
User avatar
Cook kwanton
 
Posts: 3807
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2006 9:33 pm

Postby Skittles! on Mon Jun 25, 2007 1:19 am

kwanton wrote:
kwanton wrote:Hrm three people suspect me. I'm fine with that. I will be more than happy to defend myself.

ML said that I was very careful with my vote. If that was your main accusation, then I wholeheartedly agree. Not to metagame but that is just how I play. I always want to get every piece of info before I sign someone's death sentence. If someone doesn't have many votes then sure I'll throw out a vote easily to get info cause there is little danger of a major bandwagon. But if someone (like Kalish) has many people suspecting them I tend to shy away from adding one more vote to the large amount they might have.

Looks like it's my time in the spotlight. I don't mind. This is just a part of the game. Any other questions for me to field?


There I quoted for you. Meh I was actually hoping you had solid accusations against me so I could get some argument going (even if I'm on the chopping block). Well it's two here and I'm off to bed. I have suspicions of others right now but I'll figure it out when they post. I don't want to name any names though cause I want them to act normally.

Which you said before
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
User avatar
Private Skittles!
 
Posts: 14574
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 2:18 am

Postby Neutrino on Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:56 am

LSU Tiger Josh wrote:
It's 1am here so I'm off to bed. Perhaps Skoffin will change my mind tomorrow, but at this point I find it highly unlikely as her inactions this game speak louder then what I can imagine her saying. If I do change though, my vote will go to Neutrino for the reasons I stated earlier.


Wait, wait, wait.

This dosent make sense.

You are supiscious of me because you think I was defending Skoffin, yet, if Skoffin manages to convince you of her innocence, I'm the one you'll go after next?

How
does that make sense?
We own all your helmets, we own all your shoes, we own all your generals. Touch us and you loooose...

The Rogue State!
User avatar
Corporal Neutrino
 
Posts: 2693
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 2:53 am
Location: Combating the threat of dihydrogen monoxide.

Postby Serbia on Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:30 am

Can we get a count?

FOS on Skoffin, would vote, but I want to know how many votes there are, and read what she has to say about it.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12260
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby Serbia on Mon Jun 25, 2007 6:31 am

as far as reasons, yeah, it seems scummy not voting for Kalish, while paying attention... in the middle of a lynch, that's when the other scum start acting suspicious. perhaps, skoffin?
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Captain Serbia
 
Posts: 12260
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Location: Detroit

Postby Skoffin on Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:08 am

freezie wrote:To ML:
I have seen skoffin play for a while, and most of the times, her style of play doesn't include many votes.

I do KNOW it's far from beeing a good idea, but in my eyes it doesn't mean she is scum.

Somehow I managed to go the whole time in simpsons mafia without voting and I was Flanders *slaps forehead*
LSU Tiger Josh wrote: [i]It should also be noted that the only thing skoffin did on Day 3 prior to Kalish being killed was make fun of Mandy's cop role [i] which turned out to be legit in lieu of his death last night and to want to kill off a suspected fool(Derf). If she is town then she has been pretty damn unhelpful while if she is scum I could see why she has lacked helping us so much this game.

I did? I honestly don't remember that, could you give some quotes?

Yes, I did want too. Note how I never voted for him. I stated how I would really really like to see him gone. I wouldn't waste a lynch on them, but I'd still prefer to see the 'fools' gone. We know there are some fools in this game, but atleast skittles wasn't useless when they were one. And these others that piped up claiming the role could be mafia just latching onto that role and getting a 'free pass' through the game.


LSU Tiger Josh wrote:It should also be noted that Skoffin was around while Kalish posted his weak defense and she never really responded to that either instead she only chod chad to stop posting so she didn't want to bring a vote against a fellow scumbag.

Yes I was, something unexpected came up, I went off for a bit assuming I already voted. My mind was over the place that day and I honestly thought I had, unfortunetly I have no way of proving that so there's not really any way I can convince you on that matter.

kwanton wrote:Well I was going back to find evidence to refute skittles! claim that i avoid the spotlight and I came across a couple other interesting things instead. One:

Skoffin wrote: Ack, well seems I wasn't the only one confused. I thought Skittles was dead too.

I honestly thought I had voted yesterday before I left, I got kicked off and didn't worry about it. But since in the end more people came along it doesn't matter that much *shrugs*
Anyways for now I'm going over some things I thought suspiscious earlier, I'll add my opinions in the morning.


Could be a lie. But it sounds legit to me.

Two:
HBH voted skittles! cuz he "likes M&Ms"

I'd be more surprised if he actually had a good reason.

Anyway back to my search. Just wanted to bring those 2 things to everyone's attention.


*Pats Kwanton on the head*

Before you bring the burning torches and pitchforks, I'm going back through the thread now to see if I can try to be somewhat useful before I go. I'll be back in maybe half an hour or so.
Image
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
User avatar
Lieutenant Skoffin
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby LSU Tiger Josh on Mon Jun 25, 2007 7:53 am

Skoffin wrote:
freezie wrote:To ML:
I have seen skoffin play for a while, and most of the times, her style of play doesn't include many votes.

I do KNOW it's far from beeing a good idea, but in my eyes it doesn't mean she is scum.

Somehow I managed to go the whole time in simpsons mafia without voting and I was Flanders *slaps forehead*
LSU Tiger Josh wrote: [i]It should also be noted that the only thing skoffin did on Day 3 prior to Kalish being killed was make fun of Mandy's cop role [i] which turned out to be legit in lieu of his death last night and to want to kill off a suspected fool(Derf). If she is town then she has been pretty damn unhelpful while if she is scum I could see why she has lacked helping us so much this game.

I did? I honestly don't remember that, could you give some quotes?

Yes, I did want too. Note how I never voted for him. I stated how I would really really like to see him gone. I wouldn't waste a lynch on them, but I'd still prefer to see the 'fools' gone. We know there are some fools in this game, but atleast skittles wasn't useless when they were one. And these others that piped up claiming the role could be mafia just latching onto that role and getting a 'free pass' through the game.


LSU Tiger Josh wrote:It should also be noted that Skoffin was around while Kalish posted his weak defense and she never really responded to that either instead she only chod chad to stop posting so she didn't want to bring a vote against a fellow scumbag.

Yes I was, something unexpected came up, I went off for a bit assuming I already voted. My mind was over the place that day and I honestly thought I had, unfortunetly I have no way of proving that so there's not really any way I can convince you on that matter.

kwanton wrote:Well I was going back to find evidence to refute skittles! claim that i avoid the spotlight and I came across a couple other interesting things instead. One:

Skoffin wrote: Ack, well seems I wasn't the only one confused. I thought Skittles was dead too.

I honestly thought I had voted yesterday before I left, I got kicked off and didn't worry about it. But since in the end more people came along it doesn't matter that much *shrugs*
Anyways for now I'm going over some things I thought suspiscious earlier, I'll add my opinions in the morning.


Could be a lie. But it sounds legit to me.

Two:
HBH voted skittles! cuz he "likes M&Ms"

I'd be more surprised if he actually had a good reason.

Anyway back to my search. Just wanted to bring those 2 things to everyone's attention.


*Pats Kwanton on the head*

Before you bring the burning torches and pitchforks, I'm going back through the thread now to see if I can try to be somewhat useful before I go. I'll be back in maybe half an hour or so.


Flanders also got killed at some point and we had an idiot for a bus driver in there that kept causing other townies to die in Simpsons. If someone isn't voting on scum it is pretty damn suspicious as they might as well be scum themselves.

I'll find your unhelpfullness quotes in a few hours as I have to go into town in a few minutes. The fools are the part of the vanilla townies this game. While some are more helpful then others, just the same its better that they are alive at this point as even a "fool" saw fit to join in on the lynch and HAMMER the scum while you didn't vote or even comment on it that night.

No you won't convince me of that as you were around and hanging out enough reading the thread to tell Chad to stop posting there without really commenting on what was getting discussed. At best, you were submarining while at worse, you are SCUM

Like I said, I'll go through and show you eactly how unhelpful you've been this game when I get back in a few hours.
LSU Tiger Josh
The man, the myth, the legend has returned.
Corporal LSU Tiger Josh
 
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Louisiana

Postby Talapus on Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:01 am

Image

"Reform at Arkham"
Image
By: Summer Gleeson

All of Gotham was shocked earlier today when the police released the fact that late last night, Detective Bullock was killed. The exact details of his death are still unknown, but with the Commissioner being killed 3 days ago and now Bullock, Gotham residents are in an uproar.

That fact that Batman and Robin have stepped up to aide police in apprehending the murderer at Arkham Asylum, has not done anything to curb the deaths within its halls. Over the past several days, inmates, police, and employees have been brutally murdered within the asylum. With no end in site, Mayor Hamilton Hill held a press conference earlier today in which he addressed the problems faced at Arkham.

“For over a week now, citizens have watched as innocents and inmates have been murdered up at Arkham Asylum. In fact, with most of Gotham’s police force and Batman and Robin up there for a week now, the murders haven’t slowed down at all. This will not stand! It is time we take control of our city once again!

After talking to the investigators working on Detective Bullock’s murder, it seems as though there is still confusion as to who is responsible for killing him. In fact, one of Arkham’s employes, the only one to witness the murder, still insists that it was Batman who was responsible for killing Bullock. Although there is no proof of this yet, it is clear that Batman and Robin have failed the city of Gotham and are in over their heads. With the police force equally incapable of bringing these murders to an end, it is time we take matters into our own hands.

Tonight, I will hold a press conference from inside Arkham in which all the press will be invited. Detective Bullock believed for the longest time that allowing the inmates of Arkham to remain separated and letting them keep there costumes from their former lives of crime, has only slowed their rehabilitation. In fact, many inmates of Arkham have been able to bring and keep items from there former lives to Arkham and keep them in their cells. The doctors up there claim it is to help the violent criminals adjust back up to normal society gradually, but I believe this notion is misguided and now quite moot. It is quite apparent that one or many of the inmates have no intention what so ever of changing.

In a few hours, Gotham will watch as all the inmates of Arkham are gathered into one room where they will be confronted by police, the press, and most importantly, their fellow inmates. It is time for answers Gotham, we deserve nothing less! Those inmates unwilling to cooperate will be sentenced to lethal injection and said punishment will be carried out on live TV. It is time to flush out the culprits responsible for these heinous acts. Whoever they are, they show no remorse or compassion for their victims. As such, we will show none towards them. Until answers are gained Gotham, I promise you this night will not end!”

Stronger words from our mayor have never been heard. It is now apparent that he is done and fed up with the uncontrolled violence up at Arkham. I have no idea how this will turn out or even if this is the wisest course of action, I also no longer care. These murders must be stopped, if this is the only way to do it, then so be it. Until tonight Gotham, STAY SAFE!




IN 24 HOURS, THIS GAME GETS A LOT HARDER. TRUST NO ONE, BECAUSE THINGS ARE GOING TO CHANGE! ALSO, THERE WILL BE NO MORE VOTE COUNTS FOR THE REST OF DAY 4 SINCE THERE WILL BE NO LYNCH TONIGHT. GOOD LUCK INMATES AND GOTHAMITES ALIKE, YOU’LL NEED IT!
Last edited by Talapus on Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:13 am, edited 3 times in total.
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus

You lying sack of cunt!
User avatar
Corporal Talapus
 
Posts: 1705
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:26 am
Location: Hillsboro, Or

Postby LSU Tiger Josh on Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:06 am

These are all of Skoffin's posts this game.


Day 1 posts

Posted: 10 Jun 2007 03:42 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ahhh this started already? I haven't been home and only just got back, I'm going through the pages now.



Posted: 10 Jun 2007 19:20 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MountainLion wrote:
gimpy, I agree with your reasoning, but Serbia said exactly why I wouldn't vote random either.

IGMEOY gimpy

Vote Skoffin. you posted once...do you have any more to add?


I haven't slept in two days, give me a break =P I don't really have much to add at this point, lack of sleep and lack of evidence to go on.

Skittles! wrote:
Is DerfDerf meant to be in an Insane Ayslum or does he just want to be lynched?


Or it could just be a very strange but clever way to keep from being lynched for most the game? Afterall, he already has half the players decided to ignore him.

Posted: 10 Jun 2007 21:03 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't take it personally, the first day votes are usually people playing around at first voting for whomever for whatever reason.



Posted: 11 Jun 2007 20:57 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MountainLion wrote:
Skoffin, I see you're online. What do you think?


I see 10 pages have popped up overnight, give me a minute.



Posted: 11 Jun 2007 22:01 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tooo much posting happens when I'm gone =P Alright, I've gone through what I've missed.
CMC doesn't look scum to me, like Pancake said he looks more confused then anything else.
Serbia does look sortof suspicious(but then who doesn't at this point?), but I think he's more likely just been misinterpreted then anything else.

Well I'm not sure who to vote on yet, so like the others I will hold my vote for a bit. Don't worry, I'll be off for a little while but I will be back in about an hour to decide then.


Posted: 11 Jun 2007 23:35 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*is back*
Anyways, I'm inclined to believe Serbia and CMC are town, and cmc can easily just hide with serbia and we can see what happens from there. But the only problem is are we going to be able to pick out another possible lead and be able to swing enough votes that way before deadline? If we don't decide soon we could end up with a no lynch.



Posted: 12 Jun 2007 00:55 Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well I have to head off to class shortly, but still stuck as to what to do here. I've already said about serbia and CMC, Gimpy I think was just trying out a new feature like some of the others, so that leaves ML. So, vote ML

And now I'm off for a four hour night class *falls asleep


Day 1 ends. Of those posts, the only one that is semi useful in contributing to this game is the one states she believes Serbia and CMC are town. Other then that, we got nothing out of her.

Day 2, 3, and 4 coming later.
LSU Tiger Josh
The man, the myth, the legend has returned.
Corporal LSU Tiger Josh
 
Posts: 4028
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Louisiana

Postby Skoffin on Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:12 am

Wait wait wait.. I'm a little confused, by no vote tonight do you mean we cannot lynch this day?
Image
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
User avatar
Lieutenant Skoffin
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Skoffin on Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:14 am

Gah :evil: That was addressed to Talapus, I was watching rocky horror picture show while I was posting
Image
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh
Join Discord group for multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
User avatar
Lieutenant Skoffin
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:09 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Postby Talapus on Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:14 am

Skoffin wrote:Wait wait wait.. I'm a little confused, by no vote tonight do you mean we cannot lynch this day?



Nope...point all the fingers you want though and call each other out all you'd like. But there will still be no lynch :twisted:
DoomYoshi wrote:
vote talapus

You lying sack of cunt!
User avatar
Corporal Talapus
 
Posts: 1705
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:26 am
Location: Hillsboro, Or

PreviousNext

Return to Mafia Archives

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users