Moderator: Community Team
jonty125 wrote:Does anyone else have any thoughts about if roles could switch sides or any cases (I haven't got any)?
/ wrote:Each side of the game operates as it's own game with it's own day and nights to be played simultaneously, but how these threads interact with one another is a secret for now.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Rodion wrote:Either way it sucks that we have to come down to a random lynch because few players actually bothered to play the game on this side. If you're not willing to honour your commitment of playing, perhaps you should seek to be replaced?
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:@MOD: VC? and how many hours until deadline?
Rodion wrote:Vote Victor Sullivan.
With Safari's unvote and Victor Sullivan's reluctance to remove his jokevote (or contribute to the game at all), Shield could actually survive by giving me a last minute vote and winning a coin toss. Should Shield decide to take this route, my vote gives Shield the option of disputing the coin toss with someone far less useful and possibly mafia-aligned instead.
Either way it sucks that we have to come down to a random lynch because few players actually bothered to play the game on this side. If you're not willing to honour your commitment of playing, perhaps you should seek to be replaced?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Rodion wrote:Vote Victor Sullivan.
With Safari's unvote and Victor Sullivan's reluctance to remove his jokevote (or contribute to the game at all), Shield could actually survive by giving me a last minute vote and winning a coin toss. Should Shield decide to take this route, my vote gives Shield the option of disputing the coin toss with someone far less useful and possibly mafia-aligned instead.
Either way it sucks that we have to come down to a random lynch because few players actually bothered to play the game on this side. If you're not willing to honour your commitment of playing, perhaps you should seek to be replaced?
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
shieldgenerator7 wrote:wow. I've never seen VS chew anyone out like he just did
Victor Sullivan wrote:Rodion wrote:Vote Victor Sullivan.
With Safari's unvote and Victor Sullivan's reluctance to remove his jokevote (or contribute to the game at all), Shield could actually survive by giving me a last minute vote and winning a coin toss. Should Shield decide to take this route, my vote gives Shield the option of disputing the coin toss with someone far less useful and possibly mafia-aligned instead.
Either way it sucks that we have to come down to a random lynch because few players actually bothered to play the game on this side. If you're not willing to honour your commitment of playing, perhaps you should seek to be replaced?
Rodion, don't give me that crap. You ignored this thread for days while you bickered senselessly in Side A. Frankly, I'm not too fond of your overbearing and controlling posts that, in my mind, actually do more harm than good, assuming you are town. I've stepped away from this game a bit purposefully, because I had no will to continue on with the useless debate you started in Side A, regarding the 'deal' you proposed and all the repercussions of said deal. pancakemix certainly had more stamina than me when it came to attacking your defense. At any rate, I think you are blinded by bias against those who disagree with you or are not up to your standards. I'll not have it. Get your head straight and start thinking objectively.
Disclaimer: This is not to say I necessarily believe you are scum, Rodion.
-Sully
soundman wrote:Can we vote for a no lynch? With so little discussion on this side I'm not very comfortable with a random lynch.
/ wrote:Two Days Left! remember lynches are forced unless you prevent them.
everywhere116 wrote:You da man! Well, not really, because we're colorful ponies, but you get the idea.
Rodion wrote:shieldgenerator7 wrote:Rodion wrote:Can you be more clear on your intentions for posting this, Shield? I'm not completely sure whether you are actually confessing something or just trying to do your fair share of posting and taking stances in order to show yourself as an asset and consequently avoid being lynched?
Sorry if the mixed-in jokes confused you. I was trying to be helpful by posting a summary of what has been said about your gameplan: how you say it will work and the opposition to it, and also a little of my own opinion. I would say that it's a great idea, but it has a major flaw in that M/M players can gain town's trust by claiming T/M. I don't think you've addressed that yet, or if you have I missed it.
You frustrate me, sir! I actually thought we were getting somewhere as far as finding 100% mafia.
Since you asked, I have adressed that. I mentioned that if someone were to take me on the offer, everyone else would not be forced to clear the person in the other game. The deal would occur between Rodion and "the confesser", while every other townie would be able to reap its benefits in one game without having to pay its price in the other game. Is that clear?
Not to mention that, roles being assigned randomly, the odds of a M/M player existing is 2,72% I think. (3 x 3 x 3) / (11 x 10 x 9)
Would you be interested in categorizing people that voted/FOS me in the other game by which counter-argument they raised (something like PCM 1, Jonty 2, VS 3 and so on)?
I'm under the impression you'll have major trouble trying to categorize at least 2 of them.
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
edocsil wrote:God Damn. A nolynch after 9 pages of this?
Give me a break. We need the info, and this is no way to get it.
My vote remains on shield for his crap earlier today and not for championing this NL business. If another case has merit and support I will swing to it in order to have a productive lynch.
Some7hingCLEVER wrote:edocsil wrote:God Damn. A nolynch after 9 pages of this?
Give me a break. We need the info, and this is no way to get it.
My vote remains on shield for his crap earlier today and not for championing this NL business. If another case has merit and support I will swing to it in order to have a productive lynch.
9 Pages of what exactly?
us discussing this plan ..its pretty much all i see when i read through and that doesnt help us towards a lynch at all so whatever info you have on shield is great but the bigger fact is that no cases have enough merit for me to vote on so therefore my vote is on a no lynch
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users