I was playing Golden Pantheon mafia and there was an issue with a jokevote bandwagon. That lead me to looking at the whole Naxus (Firefly mafia) thing (up until he claimed and then a bit more when people started to suspect Fir) and I have a theoretical question about this "jokevoting too far" thing.
Isn't each vote on a jokevote bandwagon exponentially more suspicious than the former (with the hammer being the scummiest)? Then why arbitrarily stop at L-"x" (with phrases like "I don't like where this is going") when town can bait other people into going deeper and possibly/likely selling their anti-town alignment? I'm thinking that, other than a lyncher that could hammer for the win, whoever hammers (a townie) in jokevote stage is anti-town and a perfect D2 lynch (or N1 vig kill). That considered, shouldn't town "allow" heavy jokevote wagons to possibly bait scum into hammering?