Conquer Club

just because a team has a slight lead in terts or troop count, why do people feel the need to make the whole board target them, this shit is really starting to piss me off in games, so many of my games lately have been thrown because people dont just play the game. the politics in chat are getting out of hand. i dont even know why i made a thread for this, i just wanted to vent it out lol

Sometimes a bit of venting is necessary...

its just really getting on my tits now, cant seem to win any team games, unless it turns out by fluke

Salut Jackson!

People only target the strong in Standards and multiple team games (more than two teams), Maybe lay off the multiple's for a bit and just do two teams? That way targeting is tougher?")>

MagnusGreeol wrote:Salut Jackson!

People only target the strong in Standards and multiple team games (more than two teams), Maybe lay off the multiple's for a bit and just do two teams? That way targeting is tougher?")>

your right mag, thats probably my best way to go, just takes away from alot of maps id like to play with lots of players, but i hear you mate

MyNameIsJack wrote:

MagnusGreeol wrote:Salut Jackson!

People only target the strong in Standards and multiple team games (more than two teams), Maybe lay off the multiple's for a bit and just do two teams? That way targeting is tougher?")>

your right mag, thats probably my best way to go, just takes away from alot of maps id like to play with lots of players, but i hear you mate

Unless you do quads, then you can fit more mates in? Im 100% sure you can still play all the maps you like in quads?

There is a skill into controlling your growth as a team so as not to become the target as well.

Agreed iAm - We should have a universal term or phrase to call people out when they do this crap. A quick, concise reply in the chat - something like "fake panic" or something more clever - that openly mocks them.

Nah, I play with Jack quite a bit and I know where his frustration is coming from.

iAmCaffeine wrote:There is a skill into controlling your growth as a team so as not to become the target as well.

yeah youre right here caff, the whole peaking to early or first, there is defiantly a skill to this, sad but true

sometimes i wish chat would be not used lol but it is what it is

has happened to us a few times it seems tho

five thumbs wrote:Agreed iAm - We should have a universal term or phrase to call people out when they do this crap. A quick, concise reply in the chat - something like "fake panic" or something more clever - that openly mocks them.

i get what your saying here five but i dont think itd do much for the sheep

You can join a group of players that refuse to use chat.
They are the xiGroup.
They create game and no one is allowed to use diplomacy.

Diplomacy is very much part of the game. If you don't like it then multiplayer / multiteam isn't for you.

I don't like it either... not that I can't do it, or can't win, or think it's unfair... it just bores the hell out of me. Hence, I have moved on to mostly only playing multiplayer escalating, or 1v1's (team / poly included).

Or it could be that you just suck?

xroads wrote:Or it could be that you just suck?

Better to suck than cheat to look better than you are though.