Conquer Club

The fishy RNG system which renders one of the most retarded number distributions ever seen, LMAO a file with 50000 fixed numbers, often resulting in a bipolar square wave of events;

The wrong rules that allow you to advance 1 when you attack with 2 or 3;

The 1995 HTML (OMFG when you have 300 units sitting and you choose the number of attackers from a f****** drop box);

And shit like players starting with full continents, yesterday my opponent started with South America in the classic map, luckily I was the first to play;

Hahahahahah... But this one really takes the cake:


Then they wonder why is the game "in decline".

You are really a whining little bitch arent you?

Get over it.

I am sure you have gotten incredible drops and dice too, everyone does. It goes both ways sometimes.

But your opponent is freemium! How can he be lucky??????

Extreme Ways wrote:But your opponent is freemium! How can he be lucky??????

+1

Also because it's already a bullshit thread.

Today my teammate survived a 24v4 in (fog trench) City Mogul, a map which eliminates a large luck part by playing with huge troopcounts.

xroads wrote:You are really a whining little bitch arent you?

Get over it.

I am sure you have gotten incredible drops and dice too, everyone does. It goes both ways sometimes.

1 - What do I care about what a fat douchebag spurdo thinks about myself.
2 - Going both ways is a stupid excuse because 2 wrongs don't make 1 right.
3 - I never got this sort of shit and I DO NOT WANT IT.

Boy, George Carlin was right.

Oh shit, another nitwit.

Condestável wrote:Oh shit, another nitwit.

Oh shit, you read my mind. Jedi mind tricks?

I don't expect Goethe or Schopenhauer from you but Star Wars is not sophisticated. Really, trust me.

Condestável wrote:I don't expect Goethe or Schopenhauer from you but Star Wars is not sophisticated. Really, trust me.

Where did I say it was sophisticated exactly?
Gotta keep it simple for the simpleton's.

Extreme Ways wrote:But your opponent is freemium! How can he be lucky??????

+2

IcePack wrote:

Condestável wrote:I don't expect Goethe or Schopenhauer from you but Star Wars is not sophisticated. Really, trust me.

Where did I say it was sophisticated exactly?
Gotta keep it simple for the simpleton's.

Dude, you are not sophisticated. You are goofy, really. Look at your ridiculous antics and existence.

you are the type sitting at a black jack table, and every time the dealer gets 21 you think it is rigged.

I dont get how you are a sergent having been here since 2011. Well I lie, I do get it.

Condestável wrote:

IcePack wrote:

Condestável wrote:I don't expect Goethe or Schopenhauer from you but Star Wars is not sophisticated. Really, trust me.

Where did I say it was sophisticated exactly?
Gotta keep it simple for the simpleton's.

Dude, you are not sophisticated. You are goofy, really. Look at your ridiculous antics and existence.

OMG I have seen the light! Thank you



EDIT:
MUCH more sophisticated now!

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I dont get how you are a sergent having been here since 2011. Well I lie, I do get it.

First, you have less % of wins than I have, don't try to belittle others especially if you aren't better yourself .

Second, I only play one-on-one and I don't care for internet "sergents", generals and assorted fantasy ranks.

Third, you should spell better than I do, I'm not a native English speaker.

Condestável wrote:

IcePack wrote:

Condestável wrote:I don't expect Goethe or Schopenhauer from you but Star Wars is not sophisticated. Really, trust me.

Where did I say it was sophisticated exactly?
Gotta keep it simple for the simpleton's.

Dude, you are not sophisticated.

Condestável wrote:

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I dont get how you are a sergent having been here since 2011. Well I lie, I do get it.

First, you have less % of wins than I have, don't try to belittle others especially if you aren't better yourself .

Second, I only play one-on-one and I don't care for internet "sergents", generals and assorted fantasy ranks.

Third, you should spell better than I do, I'm not a native English speaker.

I know I'm not the only one laughing my ass of when you accuse others of not being sophisticated and then making remarks like these.

Don't worry, he's requested the game be cancelled because it's a bug.

viewtopic.php?f=506&t=217552&view=unread#unread

Much more sophisticated!

Extreme Ways wrote:I know I'm not the only one laughing my ass of when you accuse others of not being sophisticated and then making remarks like these.

Doesn't even follow.

Condestável wrote:

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I dont get how you are a sergent having been here since 2011. Well I lie, I do get it.

First, you have less % of wins than I have, don't try to belittle others especially if you aren't better yourself .

Second, I only play one-on-one and I don't care for internet "sergents", generals and assorted fantasy ranks.

Third, you should spell better than I do, I'm not a native English speaker.

So because you have less than 50% win rate (45%) whilst only playing games with a 50% chance of winning (1v), you are better than me with my winrate higher than 12% win rate (44%) whilst not playing games smaller than six players generally.....

Stop the press, we have a genius in the house.

Condestável wrote:

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I dont get how you are a sergent having been here since 2011. Well I lie, I do get it.

First, you have less % of wins than I have, don't try to belittle others especially if you aren't better yourself .

Second, I only play one-on-one and I don't care for internet "sergents", generals and assorted fantasy ranks.

Third, you should spell better than I do, I'm not a native English speaker.

You should learn how to use your punctuation correctly.

Condestável wrote:

Extreme Ways wrote:I know I'm not the only one laughing my ass of when you accuse others of not being sophisticated and then making remarks like these.

Doesn't even follow.

You remark was about the win %.

Condestável wrote:First, you have less % of wins than I have, don't try to belittle others especially if you aren't better yourself .

But the win percentage is totally irrelevant because it does not take into account the number of players in the game.

For exemple if you exclusively play 8 players games but have a win rate of 30%, it is actually a much better win rate that 45% if you play exclusively 1vs1 game.
The score is therefore a much better indicator of the gameplay of another players.

Of course, the score isn't completely relevant either. It is extremely hard to reach high score playing only 1vs1 game for example, and the score isn't an exact measure of the quality of a player either, but it's still much more relevant that the win rate.

edit : fast-posted by WingCmdr Ginkapo

Now concerning your initial post, the drop is random, it means of course that someone can start with a bonus.
If you gonna play 1vs1, you have to accept it. Anyway 1vs1 is mainly a luck-based setting with very few strategy involved.
If you play 1vs1 you accept that the outcome of the game will be decided by the luck rather than by the strategy. It's a fact.

If you do not want your game to be mainly governed by luck, you can play team games ( or polymorphic but need to be premium), they involve much less luck, or you can play multiplayers games.
For example if you are playing an 8 players game on Eurasia, it is extremely unlikely someone will start with a bonus.

I was going to make a post laughing at Don for having a lower win percentage than me. But he doesnt. This sucks.

Don you have to suck at Risk in some way, this just aint fair.

HA I have a higher attendance rate than you. Suck it.

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:

Condestável wrote:

WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:I dont get how you are a sergent having been here since 2011. Well I lie, I do get it.

First, you have less % of wins than I have, don't try to belittle others especially if you aren't better yourself .

Second, I only play one-on-one and I don't care for internet "sergents", generals and assorted fantasy ranks.

Third, you should spell better than I do, I'm not a native English speaker.

So because you have less than 50% win rate (45%) whilst only playing games with a 50% chance of winning (1v)

Hey, go easy on the guy. His win rate is so much worse than chance because the dice are biased against him, not because he's a bad player.