To whom it might concern at CC Administration,
As one of the players in the 33 player CC10 Monumental Royale game #16257949, it is quite a let down to what has been a exciting 10 days. I would rather be playing in the 127 player game or in the 160 player game as advertise. At this point, I think the 33 players got shafted. While I realize no system is perfect and mistake can occur, I think the CC administration should understand that in my opinion (maybe others) this was the premier tournament to join, play and conquer! It's obvious placement on day 10 and shear size speaks volumes of its importance.
A few questions to consider.
1) I am curious how the selection was made for the 127 player game. It could not have been by registration order, since I was in early.
2) I am guessing the players in the 127 player game received tokens for the start of their game given the number of participants compared to the few players I could see in the log of my game that received stars. A minor detail, but still part of the overall experience for joining these tournaments.
3) How will 11 players (assuming their is really a 1st place 'CC cake' medal/token for the 33 player game) get into a 10 player game? If 11 players do get in, then 1 player will not receive one of the 10 prizes advertised.
My hope is not to spiral down the rabbit hole with negative comments, but to give feedback so the CC Administration can use this feedback to make improvements in future tournaments.
Best Regards,
dr_evil
