Conquer Club

NEW + UPDATED on updated Jan 27, 2023 Thank you to blitzaholic and JOHNNYROCKET24

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Only the first post to this thread will be edited and contain the up to date information. New high scores must be sent to me via PM with the proof that you have achieved it. A snapshot will be fine. Please do not just post " I had a 3956 ". This will not be accepted if I do not see it on the scoreboard.

I can be flexible with this, I'd rather not have my inbox flooded, but, a post in here, and some confirmation!

THE TOP 100 HIGHEST SCORES
"since the beginning of time"
(updated Jan 27th, 2023)

Note: not 100% accurate, only top 5 has been updated at this stage

CC's 5000 Point Club in color


1. josko.ri 6402
2. King_Herpes 6351
3. Sjnap 6102
4. narutoserigala 6004
5. Karelpietertje 5969
6. Blitzaholic 5740
7. fusibaseball 5707
8. Scott-Land 5522

9. thebest712 5321
10. KingofGods 5211
11. Poo-Maker 5205
12. Demonfork 5158
13. Emmdizzle 5123
14. ljex 5117
15, random21 5082
16. SkyT 5075


13. Rabbiton 4981
14. bridge2far 4801
15. Mhennigan 4797
16. lt.pie 4787
17. RashidJelzin 4779
18. Thai Robert 4752
19. Velvecarrots 4660
20. ccatman 4596
21. Buizerd 4575
22. Malabrosse 4491
23. Prankcall 4456
24. pimphawks70 4430
25. Kiron 4420
26. David Hoekstra 4404
27. Prismsaber 4383
28. Chariot of Fire 4380
29. General Mojo 4366
30. Comic Boy 4340




31. Dustine 4310
32. Master Fenrir 4282
33. Gustaf Wasa 4251
33. Hesoos 4251
35. Skillerman 4198
36. Laddida 4192
37. Chephren 4168
38. xiangwang 4168
39. Timmy1 4136
40. Seulessliathan 4131
41. ahunda 4092
42. Thomas.Paine 4091
43. billy07 4070
44. Fantasianasian 4060
45. Aaarrrrggh 4049
46. dvlajko 4045
47. LFAW 4042
48. ballenus 4015
49. Loes 4008
50. Jboy 4007




51. ManBungalow 4003
52. Chao 4001
53. JOHNNYROCKET24 3969
54. Draq 3960
55. Fruitcake 3953
56. PJDH 3922
57. Rl_Orange 3919
58. jarrett155 3917
59. josko.ri 3875
60. Big Whiskey 3868
60. Phlaim 3868
62. thezepman 3863
63. Yosevuk 3858
63. Phatscotty 3858
65. merida 3839
66. Gibbom 3838
67. FabledIntegral 3810
68. JustB 3807
70. Myrelock 3801

71. 3Asefa 3800
72. Egel 3786
73. Maniacmath17 3785
74. astompel 3776
75. eyestone 3771
76. Me-Da-MiNoRiTY 3765
77. dividedbyzero 3758
78. agonzos 3753
79. Teylen 3748
80. Naato 3735
81. Karlo Veliki 3734
82. Beadle 3731
83. Commander62890 3730
84. kumanovac 3724
85. laughingcavalier 3722
86. Greatwhite 3720
86. jbeaver 3720
88. Bilbo 3719
89. David_Wain 3717
90. Mike Doherty 3712
91. Gwaahjo 3701
92. Merz 3699
93. roadwarrior3697
93. Sam02 3697
95. Masli 3689
96. Dako 3687
97. agonzos 3681
98. wldearme 3667
99. BoganGod 3666
99. waseemalim 3666

so close, yet so far!!!!!

AMGecko 3663
Crash_22 3659
FarangDemon 3651
djt5483 3645
Rodion 3632
GallantPellham 3630
Torcav2 3625
Likemee 3616
jac99 3607


/

Why do you need 2 threads? Can you just keep it to one topic since it's the exact SAME thing?

AK_iceman wrote:Why do you need 2 threads? Can you just keep it to one topic since it's the exact SAME thing?

delete the other thread

this one was created second............ delete this one

AK_iceman wrote:Why do you need 2 threads? Can you just keep it to one topic since it's the exact SAME thing?

JR, i completely agree. You post far too much in the forum. This thread will easily overload the system, and ruin CC. You post far too much in here as it is. You have almost 250 posts. That is utterly ridiculous. Please be more responsible in the future. Use a little restraint. You only have played 2300 games or so. What makes you think you can post so many times...geez

AK has 4800 posts, but im sure every one is absolutely necessary


Leave them both...natural selection will kill off useless threads. Nothing wrong with cleaning one up once in a while in my opinion. Delete them when theyre dead if its a matter of space. If its a matter of confusion. Anyone who cant tell the difference, probably isnt on the list anyways...

AAFitz wrote:

AK_iceman wrote:Why do you need 2 threads? Can you just keep it to one topic since it's the exact SAME thing?

JR, i completely agree. You post far too much in the forum. This thread will easily overload the system, and ruin CC. You post far too much in here as it is. You have almost 250 posts. That is utterly ridiculous. Please be more responsible in the future. Use a little restraint. You only have played 2300 games or so. What makes you think you can post so many times...geez

AK has 4800 posts, but im sure every one is absolutely necessary


Leave them both...natural selection will kill off useless threads. Nothing wrong with cleaning one up once in a while in my opinion. Delete them when theyre dead if its a matter of space. If its a matter of confusion. Anyone who cant tell the difference, probably isnt on the list anyways...

I'd just like you all to notice that I wasn't on that list Although I will be sometime in the future....................

alex_white101 wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:

AK_iceman wrote:Why do you need 2 threads? Can you just keep it to one topic since it's the exact SAME thing?

delete the other thread

this one was created second............ delete this one

Well, it looks like the 1st one was deleted
Sad, it was like a bazillion pages and about 4000 views...
But it was an ill-fated venture from the beginning, being bounced to the social lounge several times... maybe it still lurks somewhere in the soft under-belly of CC archives... waiting to strike back when we least expect it. Or perhaps it was mercielessly hacked into little pieces by a penguin and buried under the snow in the remote Alaskan wilderness.

Please observe a moment of silence for those posts than can no longer be with us... may they rest in peace.

Did they seriously delete that?

I dont know what the big deal was. So the information was on 2 threads. I just set up some rules and guidelines to make it eaiser to maintain the information which could be looked back on for those who play on this site.

AAFitz wrote:Did they seriously delete that?

You heard what the man siad, that's what he said!

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I dont know what the big deal was. So the information was on 2 threads. I just set up some rules and guidelines to make it eaiser to maintain the information which could be looked back on for those who play on this site.

Exactly...if it was useless it would have died.... theres 1000 useless threads in here, and that one was slated? Hypocrisy clearly has no bounds

AAFitz wrote:

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I dont know what the big deal was. So the information was on 2 threads. I just set up some rules and guidelines to make it eaiser to maintain the information which could be looked back on for those who play on this site.

Exactly...if it was useless it would have died.... theres 1000 useless threads in here, and that one was slated? Hypocracy clearly has no bounds

Perhaps there is a strong bias against such recordkeeping by the administration for this site... YA THINK

well there is 17,000 Dugcarr and Jamie threads filling up the space. delete them.

Clearly...AK has on several occasions declared that he doesnt like such postings and llists because of elitism, or sepratism, or whatever his beef with them....of course he also has said that only 5% of players use the forum, so I dont see how it matters anyways...and im guessing 90% of those are playing in flame wars

this reeks of bias in every way...there are thousands of posts in here mostly useless, some have no response at all. Hes posted 4800 times himself...and again...im sure its all official business....hardly any are short quip remarks to new players with honest questions...simply telling a person they are wrong without really helping, or being personable about it in any way....Ive seen many posts like this by him, where I am just amazed he is on the staff here...

personally I get an overall feeling of negativity from the majority of his posts. He talks of elitism in posts, and then acts holier-than-thou in responses to new players, and acts as if he is better and cooler than everyone in almost every post....and now...ill go ahead and assume he deleted a thread that had much interest, many responses, and many ideas, with the only real reason being he didnt agree with it...

You cant delete this one too if you want AK...maybe go through and just delete all the ones you dont like....but you might want to start with your 4800 posts to see how many of those are really worthwhile, and need to be there...

AAFitz wrote:Clearly...AK has on several occasions declared that he doesnt like such postings and llists because of elitism, or sepratism, or whatever his beef with them....of course he also has said that only 5% of players use the forum, so I dont see how it matters anyways...and im guessing 90% of those are playing in flame wars

this reeks of bias in every way...there are thousands of posts in here mostly useless, some have no response at all. Hes posted 4800 times himself...and again...im sure its all official business....hardly any are short quip remarks to new players with honest questions...simply telling a person they are wrong without really helping, or being personable about it in any way....Ive seen many posts like this by him, where I am just amazed he is on the staff here...

personally I get an overall feeling of negativity from the majority of his posts. He talks of elitism in posts, and then acts holier-than-thou in responses to new players, and acts as if he is better and cooler than everyone in almost every post....and now...ill go ahead and assume he deleted a thread that had much interest, many responses, and many ideas, with the only real reason being he didnt agree with it...

You cant delete this one too if you want AK...maybe go through and just delete all the ones you dont like....but you might want to start with your 4800 posts to see how many of those are really worthwhile, and need to be there...

well said

So come on AK_Iceman, do the right thing and put it back..... please

I myself am not trying to be this negative here, but if these posts are going to be just deleted randomly, and seemingly arbitrarily, I wont waste my time with them. If theres a new post reduction policy, by all means let us know the constraints, but if you want to save space perhaps start by deleting the ones that are a year old...and not ones that are clearly active

Its only the arbitrary nature of this that Im questioning...

I find it funny you guys are whining, because he said the reason he posted this was because of all the useless quotes in the other one or something.

I just asked why 2 threads were needed for the same exact topic. The answer I got was to delete the first one, so I did.

AK_iceman wrote:I just asked why 2 threads were needed for the same exact topic. The answer I got was to delete the first one, so I did.

If JR made the other thread, then no big deal, but I was assuming it was Robinette that started the other one... if so, theres a few threads Id like you to delete too...Ill give you a list...If it was JR that started the other one...then Im totally wrong here, because he did start it, not to say that that means he owns it, but that at least makes sense

And Kyle, this isnt whining, AK likes to go around and post about useless threads, and has as many as anyone...

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:
THE TOP 10 HIGHEST SCORES
"since the beginning of time"
(updated April 25, 2007)

1. Blitzaholic 4386
2. Jork 3425
3. Eye84free 3412
4. Belzbub 3384
5. JOHNNYROCKET 3383


6. Stronger 3368
7. osujacket 3231
8. Steelplayin 3222
9. yosevuk 3198
10. Maniacmath 3185

And for fun...
Here's the high water marks for all others who have made general...
"in all of recorded history"


11. Dugcarr1 3174 *banned for being a griefer*
12. scorba 3167
13. Nuke 3160
14. Pheared 3158
15. eddymush 3150

16. Lazaruslong 3147
17. Cyberdaniel 3145
18. Theblackrose 3114
19. Subjekt 3114
20. Andrewb 3107


21. RL_Orange 3088
22. Juventino 3079
23. Pilate 3055
24. Alstergren 3048
25. marvaddin 3033
26. Robinette 3021
27. dminus 3002 *multi*

Held the # 1 Spot while being over 3K in points the longest in CC History since it's Inception: Only 6 Ever to do it!

1. Blitzaholic 170 days
2. Pilate 39 days
3. Belzbub 17 days
4. Alstergren 14 days
5. Jork 4 days
6. Eye84free 3 days

Robinette wrote:
Perhaps there is a strong bias against such recordkeeping by the administration for this site... YA THINK

there really shouldn't be, plenty of players love the stats, i think it adds more to the site's overall competitiveness.

Create more Robin

I never checked, but I would guess 64 percent waiting rate is not a CC record? I am guessing I have higher than that, and perhaps some others as well, although I never checked.

There also should be a minimum games requirement, like 1000 or something.

Blitzaholic wrote:There also should be a minimum games requirement, like 1000 or something.

1000 games as a minimum for what? Thats a hell of a lot of games, and I think only 20 people or so have played that many.

Blitzaholic wrote:I never checked, but I would guess 64 percent waiting rate is not a CC record? I am guessing I have higher than that, and perhaps some others as well, although I never checked.

There also should be a minimum games requirement, like 1000 or something.

Yeah, there are obviously new players that have 100% win records- that all goes back to the extremely small sample size. I think once you get over 100 games or so the win% is more reflective of its long run value. Of course its hard to set an arbitrary mark from where numbers go from being a small set to a large set.