Moderator: Community Team
Even if he was picking weaker players for an easy win (which I don't think he is) it's still not against the rules.
Donelladan wrote:Even if he was picking weaker players for an easy win (which I don't think he is) it's still not against the rules.
Yes it is.
DBandit70 wrote:I don't want to get anyone angry at me, but I don't see the reason why you have to invite these low rank players who have no idea what there especially when there 2 players. The 2 player games will fill fast by themselves so there is no reason to invite low rank if your so good at the map. But then again in Neme defense, if the players didn't want to join then just don't accept the invite as simple as that. but they choose to accept the invites and get killed. But overall I think it was wrong for neme to invite low ranks to the games especially since they were 2 players. if they were 4-12 player games sure that would be fine but 2 player games you have no need to invite low rank players.
DBandit70 wrote:Donelladan wrote:Even if he was picking weaker players for an easy win (which I don't think he is) it's still not against the rules.
Yes it is.
I've always wondered if there was actually a written rule.
Maj. Tom wrote:Commenting as requested - i have no idea about this farming stuff but i won't joining any more invites to 12 player no spoils, adjacent, fog, trench games. That combination was shit!
nemapredaje wrote:Many of you know me because I play CC from 2013 and longer with not used anymore older account.
bamage wrote:I can assure you that I am a neutral party and, if anything, have an antipathy towards one of the accusers.
I will just say that sending invites to random people with those game settings reeks of farming. If you are being honest with yourself, you are absolutely trying to catch people off-guard and at a disadvantage.
Ask yourself this. What kind of place would CC be if everyone, or even 10% of the community, did what you are doing? It would suck.
EnRola wrote:I am giving my opinion because you asked it, nema.
I was also invited through my wall for a game on USA Senate map, with zombie parachute Fog Trench settings, for 12 players, all of them low rank.
I went to search for your history and realized that you kept playing with these settings, everytime against low level players.
I wrote on your wall to try a different map, different settings, bla bla bla. Your answer: Beat me! My answer: invite
Same invite and I beat you!
Regarding you farming, I don't know, but I think is not a good thing you are doing overall. Here is the game for everyone to see the chat: https://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=20521461.
I did my part on mind games.
ZaBeast wrote:Let's put aside the fact you admit in your post you're doing this so you can get your rank up, which somewhat points to farming (because you said that if you drop your waiting games, you'd lose your shot at the most improved scoreboard) and talk about the inviting portion.
I don't think it's a coincidence most of the people playing you have only a handful of games played on Gallipoli, and say in chat they don't understand how the map works, which is clear farming (or ranching, don't remember the terminology), regardless of total number of games your opponents played. Targeting inexperienced people for easy points is against the rules (and as far as I know, delaying games to feb. 1st to manipulate the scoreboard is as well). Since you can have 100 waiting games, going freemium is no excuse for sending out invites left and right. I don't see how opening a report about that would be considered harassment. And if you want to continue engaging with Caff and ICON members, feel free to do so, but don't go complaining about it afterwards. Otherwise just foe them since they won't join your farming games anyways and you won't join their games.
Donelladan wrote:DBandit70 wrote:Donelladan wrote:Even if he was picking weaker players for an easy win (which I don't think he is) it's still not against the rules.
Yes it is.
I've always wondered if there was actually a written rule.
People have been warned for that exactly. The Rules only mention farming new recruit, but the rules page is really short.
Systematically inviting unexperienced players on a complex map has been punished before, there is no reason to think it would be allowed now.
TeeGee wrote:Done on a large scale, it is what we call RANCHING
It is pretty much what lead to PaPs demise, he also couldn't see what he was doing wrong.
You're treading on a very thin line if you continue to do it.
Why not start games and not invite? That way those who want to join, will join without pressure.
I would also advise in the very strongest of ways not to switch to inviting via PMs
Extreme Ways wrote:Use of language doesn't help you here, but you can always try to report harassment or foe people. Poor man naruto is a well-known farmer too btw, and I'm sure people didn't like getting the 5th invite for Josko's tourney after rejecting the previous 4 either.
Best option if admin does not deem is as excessive harassment is to foe and move on.
general cod wrote:There are many players who use the same 'cheap' tactics to get monthly prizes, climb the leaderboard or just to get an erect cock. Seems like Nema is being made a bit of a scapegoat but if you play with fire......
Using my algorythm i decree our illustrious conqueror has a permanent hard-on, on the other end of the scale IamCaffeine is clinically limp but by way of using a splint and hard work goddammit he gets the job done, good on you mate.
Obviously i was requested to comment too, perhaps Nema isn't aware of my personality malfunction but good luck ....
Shannon Apple wrote:I'm not sure what the problem is here. You haven't been banned. No action was taken against you. The admin asked you to maybe diversify the games you play and stop inviting random people on their walls. I can't see why this is so hard for you. It doesn't matter if players are cooks or colonels. If you are inviting them in large scale to a map or maps they have never played, this is ranching. Can you imagine if every player started doing this? Filling people's walls with unwanted invites? It would be terrible. Some people join because they feel it's rude to decline. But most people don't like getting this on their walls.
You haven't been accused of ranching yet by the admin team, so maybe it's time to reconsider the random invite thing? hmm?
Just putting it out there that IF someone invited me to a game on weird settings (freestyle counts as weird to people who never play it) and I notice they've been doing it systematically, I will consider them a rancher and add them to my foe list. I don't like people like that. They're just hoarding points, and not really playing the game, imho.
king achilles wrote:With regards to high ranked players getting into the mix, this report does expose that they are also susceptible of getting victimized inspite the experiences gained through the games they have played and won in attaining their rank. It all boils down as someone purposefully inviting people who have no experience with certain settings to guarantee a win which can be translated as what we call "Ranching" or harvesting of points. In my opinion, I don't think Antarctica is a complicated map but it does offer a certain way on how you could play it advantageous for you but I guess that goes to every map out there as well.
There is a line in which that it becomes "gross abuse". When you do something that can be seen as Ranching in a massive scale, then it can be considered as Gross abuse.
As it has been pointed out in this thread a number of times, do NOT ranch your way to earn points from unsuspecting players or purposely seek out players with little to no experience on certain maps you are good at and invite them to private matches. If you have an idea that what you are doing kinda looks shady or it looks like you are exploiting, stop. Ask around and clarify before it reaches to this. The accused has been warned.
king achilles wrote:Basically, in these 1 vs 1 games, the opponent does not have an idea of how to play the map or how to engage in the settings of the game that was made. It's like you constructed a way to make a player become like a "new recruit", because you made a game that he will play for the first time in which you have played countless times already. Regularly doing this to different (unsuspecting) players is a systematic way of ranching points for yourself. These games exhibits a pattern of how someone can methodically target specific ranks or players that have no idea on how to play the map for the purpose of ranching. It's not fair to regularly do this. We will classify this as a gross abuse of the game.
Since we have always seen him as someone who just prefers to play against low ranked players in the past, re-checking his private games with certain settings has shed some light that this practice is more malicious than it seems. This does not mean that no one is allowed anymore to invite low ranks or unfamiliar players to private games. You can play any ranks publicly or privately but make sure that this practice is not done in extreme numbers to the point that you are already doing this regularly, seeking out specific ranks or players in order to ranch some points.
ZaBeast wrote:These are from your recent 40 or so finished games. >¼ of the players who admit to not knowing how to play those settings/having very little experience with those
Other cases have already set a precedent that inviting inexperienced players can constitute abuse, and while this is not on the same scale (and in this case the games are at least public), it is indeed a thin line that's being treadedking achilles wrote:With regards to high ranked players getting into the mix, this report does expose that they are also susceptible of getting victimized inspite the experiences gained through the games they have played and won in attaining their rank. It all boils down as someone purposefully inviting people who have no experience with certain settings to guarantee a win which can be translated as what we call "Ranching" or harvesting of points. In my opinion, I don't think Antarctica is a complicated map but it does offer a certain way on how you could play it advantageous for you but I guess that goes to every map out there as well.
There is a line in which that it becomes "gross abuse". When you do something that can be seen as Ranching in a massive scale, then it can be considered as Gross abuse.
As it has been pointed out in this thread a number of times, do NOT ranch your way to earn points from unsuspecting players or purposely seek out players with little to no experience on certain maps you are good at and invite them to private matches. If you have an idea that what you are doing kinda looks shady or it looks like you are exploiting, stop. Ask around and clarify before it reaches to this. The accused has been warned.king achilles wrote:Basically, in these 1 vs 1 games, the opponent does not have an idea of how to play the map or how to engage in the settings of the game that was made. It's like you constructed a way to make a player become like a "new recruit", because you made a game that he will play for the first time in which you have played countless times already. Regularly doing this to different (unsuspecting) players is a systematic way of ranching points for yourself. These games exhibits a pattern of how someone can methodically target specific ranks or players that have no idea on how to play the map for the purpose of ranching. It's not fair to regularly do this. We will classify this as a gross abuse of the game.
Since we have always seen him as someone who just prefers to play against low ranked players in the past, re-checking his private games with certain settings has shed some light that this practice is more malicious than it seems. This does not mean that no one is allowed anymore to invite low ranks or unfamiliar players to private games. You can play any ranks publicly or privately but make sure that this practice is not done in extreme numbers to the point that you are already doing this regularly, seeking out specific ranks or players in order to ranch some points.
So yes, farming. Caff caught it, you're just digging a hole for yourself by further complaining that his report was just some sort of vendeta against you, because there is basis to it. Now stop making people waste their time by replying to a pointless thread and move on. And just to clarify because you still don't seem to get it, the abuse is not playing those specific settings, it's getting inexperienced people to play them by inviting them.
ZaBeast wrote:which is clear farming (or ranching, don't remember the terminology), regardless of total number of games your opponents played.
king achilles wrote:This is not comparable to PaP. Stop lighting your torches so quickly.
Donelladan wrote:Systematically inviting unexperienced players on a complex map has been punished before, there is no reason to think it would be allowed now.
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users