WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Yeah, but I am left handed
So you have a sinister wank spanner then mate.
Moderator: Community Team
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Yeah, but I am left handed
DoomYoshi wrote:I agree that we need a mod to keep the LGBT community under control.
BoganGod wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Yeah, but I am left handed
So you have a sinister wank spanner then mate.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:BoganGod wrote:WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Yeah, but I am left handed
So you have a sinister wank spanner then mate.
This is exactly the sort of crap that we need a left handed mod to protect us from.
xroads wrote:What issues are there honestly besides the ones that the OP starts? I have never seen another.
DoomYoshi wrote:xroads wrote:What issues are there honestly besides the ones that the OP starts? I have never seen another.
Here's one issue: the LGBT community talks out of both sides of the mouth.
For years, the gay have been saying that they are "born that way" that homosexual is "something you are" meaning it can't be cured.
Now, Judith Butler comes along 30 years ago and says that actually gender isn't "something you are" but it is "something you do".
So, if it's something you are, then the transgender can be cured. If it's something you do, then they can all be cured by doing something else. The only reason both schizophrenic versions of the story can coexist is because nobody is allowed to have an honest debate about the topic, either though gender studies is at almost every University.
So we need a moderator to settle the debate amongst the LGBT community: which is it - something you "do" or "are". Then, the sane world can at least attack only one argument instead of a flanking surprise attack.
Either way, if it's something you "are", so is being a bigot, and the rights of bigots should be respected. If it's something you "do", so is being a bigot, and the rights of bigots should be respected.
Symmetry wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:xroads wrote:What issues are there honestly besides the ones that the OP starts? I have never seen another.
Here's one issue: the LGBT community talks out of both sides of the mouth.
For years, the gay have been saying that they are "born that way" that homosexual is "something you are" meaning it can't be cured.
Now, Judith Butler comes along 30 years ago and says that actually gender isn't "something you are" but it is "something you do".
So, if it's something you are, then the transgender can be cured. If it's something you do, then they can all be cured by doing something else. The only reason both schizophrenic versions of the story can coexist is because nobody is allowed to have an honest debate about the topic, either though gender studies is at almost every University.
So we need a moderator to settle the debate amongst the LGBT community: which is it - something you "do" or "are". Then, the sane world can at least attack only one argument instead of a flanking surprise attack.
Either way, if it's something you "are", so is being a bigot, and the rights of bigots should be respected. If it's something you "do", so is being a bigot, and the rights of bigots should be respected.
I can only assume you've had some sort of catastrophic brain malfunction after this and your previous antisemitic forum rant. Is there a condition where you might irrationally hate people who use both sides of their mouths when speaking?
I do need to ask, DY, is it possible that you've had a stroke? Have you been checked?
xroads wrote:What issues are there honestly besides the ones that the OP starts? I have never seen another.
WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:Symmetry wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:xroads wrote:What issues are there honestly besides the ones that the OP starts? I have never seen another.
Here's one issue: the LGBT community talks out of both sides of the mouth.
For years, the gay have been saying that they are "born that way" that homosexual is "something you are" meaning it can't be cured.
Now, Judith Butler comes along 30 years ago and says that actually gender isn't "something you are" but it is "something you do".
So, if it's something you are, then the transgender can be cured. If it's something you do, then they can all be cured by doing something else. The only reason both schizophrenic versions of the story can coexist is because nobody is allowed to have an honest debate about the topic, either though gender studies is at almost every University.
So we need a moderator to settle the debate amongst the LGBT community: which is it - something you "do" or "are". Then, the sane world can at least attack only one argument instead of a flanking surprise attack.
Either way, if it's something you "are", so is being a bigot, and the rights of bigots should be respected. If it's something you "do", so is being a bigot, and the rights of bigots should be respected.
I can only assume you've had some sort of catastrophic brain malfunction after this and your previous antisemitic forum rant. Is there a condition where you might irrationally hate people who use both sides of their mouths when speaking?
I do need to ask, DY, is it possible that you've had a stroke? Have you been checked?
As a bigot, he has rights. Respect them.
Symmetry wrote:DoomYoshi wrote:xroads wrote:What issues are there honestly besides the ones that the OP starts? I have never seen another.
Here's one issue: the LGBT community talks out of both sides of the mouth.
For years, the gay have been saying that they are "born that way" that homosexual is "something you are" meaning it can't be cured.
Now, Judith Butler comes along 30 years ago and says that actually gender isn't "something you are" but it is "something you do".
So, if it's something you are, then the transgender can be cured. If it's something you do, then they can all be cured by doing something else. The only reason both schizophrenic versions of the story can coexist is because nobody is allowed to have an honest debate about the topic, either though gender studies is at almost every University.
So we need a moderator to settle the debate amongst the LGBT community: which is it - something you "do" or "are". Then, the sane world can at least attack only one argument instead of a flanking surprise attack.
Either way, if it's something you "are", so is being a bigot, and the rights of bigots should be respected. If it's something you "do", so is being a bigot, and the rights of bigots should be respected.
I can only assume you've had some sort of catastrophic brain malfunction after this and your previous antisemitic forum rant. Is there a condition where you might irrationally hate people who use both sides of their mouths when speaking?
I do need to ask, DY, is it possible that you've had a stroke? Have you been checked?
Symmetry wrote:xroads wrote:What issues are there honestly besides the ones that the OP starts? I have never seen another.
Do you think that LGBT issues are purely the product of me? Kind of a stretch, doncha think? I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that you're straight. I don't say that to dismiss you, but just as, hopefully, part of am honest discussion.
If you're willing, take a look at your reply again from a position where you're a minority. There are obviously issues, and there's a weird demand for those who bring up those issues to be the cause of those issues and thus punished.
I'm not sure if you managed to put yourself in another's shoes here, or even if you tried. I hope you understand a little bit more about why LGBT folk might be reticent about posting openly.
xroads wrote:Symmetry wrote:xroads wrote:What issues are there honestly besides the ones that the OP starts? I have never seen another.
Do you think that LGBT issues are purely the product of me? Kind of a stretch, doncha think? I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that you're straight. I don't say that to dismiss you, but just as, hopefully, part of am honest discussion.
If you're willing, take a look at your reply again from a position where you're a minority. There are obviously issues, and there's a weird demand for those who bring up those issues to be the cause of those issues and thus punished.
I'm not sure if you managed to put yourself in another's shoes here, or even if you tried. I hope you understand a little bit more about why LGBT folk might be reticent about posting openly.
Yes I am 100% straight
I also have many many gay friends.
What I don't understand is this is a gaming site, based on the game of Risk. That is what has drawn us all here.
Other then yourself, I have never seen or heard anything said positive or negative about lgbt. So why is it such an issue?
xroads wrote:Symmetry wrote:xroads wrote:What issues are there honestly besides the ones that the OP starts? I have never seen another.
Do you think that LGBT issues are purely the product of me? Kind of a stretch, doncha think? I'm gonna go out on a limb here and guess that you're straight. I don't say that to dismiss you, but just as, hopefully, part of am honest discussion.
If you're willing, take a look at your reply again from a position where you're a minority. There are obviously issues, and there's a weird demand for those who bring up those issues to be the cause of those issues and thus punished.
I'm not sure if you managed to put yourself in another's shoes here, or even if you tried. I hope you understand a little bit more about why LGBT folk might be reticent about posting openly.
Yes I am 100% straight
I also have many many gay friends.
What I dont understand is this is a gaming site, based on the game of Risk. That is what has drawn us all here.
Other then yourself, I have never seen or heard anything said positive or negative about lgbt. So why is it such an issue?
Symmetry wrote:I genuinely didn't think of this as a troll thread. It's pretty much well established that I'd like things to be more LGBT open here.
xroads wrote:What is there to express here in a gaming site about being gay?
"Hey pink, I want your territory, but I dont really want to attack you since I am gay. Can you please move out of that territory?"
mookiemcgee wrote:xroads wrote:What is there to express here in a gaming site about being gay?
"Hey pink, I want your territory, but I dont really want to attack you since I am gay. Can you please move out of that territory?"
I mean i'm mostly straight (say like 85-90%), but i use this strategy ALL THE TIME.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
mookiemcgee wrote:Symmetry wrote:I genuinely didn't think of this as a troll thread. It's pretty much well established that I'd like things to be more LGBT open here.
has anyone stopped you from being LBGT open? I mean you were able to open this thread weren't you? Said whatever you liked? Other said there opinions too, even if you didn't agree with them? How much more open could you hope it to be? I mean open is one thing, everyone agreeing with you... that's a whole nother thing.
Symmetry wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:Symmetry wrote:I genuinely didn't think of this as a troll thread. It's pretty much well established that I'd like things to be more LGBT open here.
has anyone stopped you from being LBGT open? I mean you were able to open this thread weren't you? Said whatever you liked? Other said there opinions too, even if you didn't agree with them? How much more open could you hope it to be? I mean open is one thing, everyone agreeing with you... that's a whole nother thing.
Well, there's the kind of obvious stuff where even using the word "gay" could get you banned, and still gets you added punishment
I guess I'd like to see a forum here where being open is OK.
BoganGod wrote:mookiemcgee wrote:xroads wrote:What is there to express here in a gaming site about being gay?
"Hey pink, I want your territory, but I dont really want to attack you since I am gay. Can you please move out of that territory?"
I mean i'm mostly straight (say like 85-90%), but i use this strategy ALL THE TIME.
The 15-10% not straight bit is between your navel and upper thighs right?
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users