CC'S ALL TIME TOP 100 SCORES

[Blitzaholic]

yes, that was jr's, I did copy and paste it and quoted it, then compared it to mine and also reviewed the thread of records, top 5's and 1st 5's and found them to be a little off then what I had. again, map rank is not always 100% reliable as you can see from reading from earlier posts, however, in most cases, in is a close ball park.

3701 my new highscore.

I will add this.

[josko.ri]

yes, that was jr's, I did copy and paste it and quoted it, then compared it to mine and also reviewed the thread of records, top 5's and 1st 5's and found them to be a little off then what I had. again, map rank is not always 100% reliable as you can see from reading from earlier posts, however, in most cases, in is a close ball park.

I think that list made by just observations and notifications is less accurate than the one from map rank. ok, map rank can make mistakes due to some missing logs from 2006/07 but system of observations can make bigger mistakes. on this list, you dont have correct high scores for 6 players (from my last post) who made their high score this month, just because they dont post here (maybe they even dont know this thread exists).
so, if 6 players' high scores in less than one month was not mentioned and recorded, then I think map rank, which makes minor mistakes(and makes it only for old players), is much more reliable source than notification system.
and also, JR's system was very accurate in his recording of scores, I think there was no real chance that he recorded higher score than someone really had. that makes me think that if he recorded higher score for someone than you recorded on your lists, you should hold his data. if he had lower score on his list then you should add your data, so the list would be with more precise data.

[Blitzaholic]

yes, that was jr's, I did copy and paste it and quoted it, then compared it to mine and also reviewed the thread of records, top 5's and 1st 5's and found them to be a little off then what I had. again, map rank is not always 100% reliable as you can see from reading from earlier posts, however, in most cases, in is a close ball park.

I think that list made by just observations and notifications is less accurate than the one from map rank. ok, map rank can make mistakes due to some missing logs from 2006/07 but system of observations can make bigger mistakes. on this list, you dont have correct high scores for 6 players (from my last post) who made their high score this month, just because they dont post here (maybe they even dont know this thread exists).
so, if 6 players' high scores in less than one month was not mentioned and recorded, then I think map rank, which makes minor mistakes(and makes it only for old players), is much more reliable source than notification system.
and also, JR's system was very accurate in his recording of scores, I think there was no real chance that he recorded higher score than someone really had. that makes me think that if he recorded higher score for someone than you recorded on your lists, you should hold his data. if he had lower score on his list then you should add your data, so the list would be with more precise data.

that is a good point, JR's system was very accurate in his recording of scores. I can go review it and make an update, thx josko.ri.

[josko.ri]

yes, that was jr's, I did copy and paste it and quoted it, then compared it to mine and also reviewed the thread of records, top 5's and 1st 5's and found them to be a little off then what I had. again, map rank is not always 100% reliable as you can see from reading from earlier posts, however, in most cases, in is a close ball park.

I think that list made by just observations and notifications is less accurate than the one from map rank. ok, map rank can make mistakes due to some missing logs from 2006/07 but system of observations can make bigger mistakes. on this list, you dont have correct high scores for 6 players (from my last post) who made their high score this month, just because they dont post here (maybe they even dont know this thread exists).
so, if 6 players' high scores in less than one month was not mentioned and recorded, then I think map rank, which makes minor mistakes(and makes it only for old players), is much more reliable source than notification system.
and also, JR's system was very accurate in his recording of scores, I think there was no real chance that he recorded higher score than someone really had. that makes me think that if he recorded higher score for someone than you recorded on your lists, you should hold his data. if he had lower score on his list then you should add your data, so the list would be with more precise data.

that is a good point, JR's system was very accurate in his recording of scores. I can go review it and make an update, thx josko.ri.

thanks for lot of effort put here, it is very pleasure for everyone to see own name on best 100 ever list, so I only want to help to run it with more precision. I am not old member so you know better how to record old scores, but for future high scores I may help with recording it with high precision rate.

[Blitzaholic]

yes, that was jr's, I did copy and paste it and quoted it, then compared it to mine and also reviewed the thread of records, top 5's and 1st 5's and found them to be a little off then what I had. again, map rank is not always 100% reliable as you can see from reading from earlier posts, however, in most cases, in is a close ball park.

I think that list made by just observations and notifications is less accurate than the one from map rank. ok, map rank can make mistakes due to some missing logs from 2006/07 but system of observations can make bigger mistakes. on this list, you dont have correct high scores for 6 players (from my last post) who made their high score this month, just because they dont post here (maybe they even dont know this thread exists).
so, if 6 players' high scores in less than one month was not mentioned and recorded, then I think map rank, which makes minor mistakes(and makes it only for old players), is much more reliable source than notification system.
and also, JR's system was very accurate in his recording of scores, I think there was no real chance that he recorded higher score than someone really had. that makes me think that if he recorded higher score for someone than you recorded on your lists, you should hold his data. if he had lower score on his list then you should add your data, so the list would be with more precise data.

that is a good point, JR's system was very accurate in his recording of scores. I can go review it and make an update, thx josko.ri.

thanks for lot of effort put here, it is very pleasure for everyone to see own name on best 100 ever list, so I only want to help to run it with more precision. I am not old member so you know better how to record old scores, but for future high scores I may help with recording it with high precision rate.

ok, thx a lot m8

I would appreciate that.

[josko.ri]

btw, if a player has zero missing logs, does it mean that map rank for him/her is accurate?

[nagerous]

these players right now has more points than on this list:

6 pimphawks70 4408
7 David Hoekstra 4346
19 Myrelock 3784
20 josko.ri 3672
23 merida 3621 (outside of top 100)

also, some players on your list has less high score than in last active JR's list which you inherited from him.

what about krusher? map rank says he had 5514 high score and he is not here on the list at all. maybe map rank is not so accurate but so big mistake I think shouldnt be done.

he cheated to get that score (something about secret diplomacy in 8 man fs escalating, not exactly sure if that is correct but that is what i heard)...there used to be a wall of shame on the bottom, dont know where it is now.

aha, so the ones who cheated are not considered in this list? good
btw, if player is not registered user (he is listed as guest), does it mean that he was cheating andkicked out because of that? one "guest" is in this list (outside of best 100 right now) KLOBBER

It just depends on if they cheated to get their high score (on the list), klobber was just a recent guesting I think, may not have even be related to gameplay

Klobber was busted for multi accounts

I don't think so. He was guested for forum violations I believe.

[InsomniaRed]

KLOBBER was busted for multi accounts back in August, though he also had forum violations.

[Blitzaholic]

KLOBBER was busted for multi accounts back in August, though he also had forum violations.

InsomniaRed is correct as usual.


Another minor flaw is the scoreboard updates every hour, some players may of reached higher scores at times within that short timeframe in which the scoreboard would not show, because they could of lost some games right after they won. This is why I had many players months ago post it (high score) with players confirming it in this thread.

[josko.ri]

KLOBBER was busted for multi accounts back in August, though he also had forum violations.

InsomniaRed is correct as usual.


Another minor flaw is the scoreboard updates every hour, some players may of reached higher scores at times within that short timeframe in which the scoreboard would not show, because they could of lost some games right after they won. This is why I had many players months ago post it (high score) with players confirming it in this thread.

nobody answered so I ask again:

if a player has zero missing logs, does it mean that map rank for him/her is accurate?

[Leehar]

KLOBBER was busted for multi accounts back in August, though he also had forum violations.

InsomniaRed is correct as usual.


Another minor flaw is the scoreboard updates every hour, some players may of reached higher scores at times within that short timeframe in which the scoreboard would not show, because they could of lost some games right after they won. This is why I had many players months ago post it (high score) with players confirming it in this thread.

nobody answered so I ask again:

if a player has zero missing logs, does it mean that map rank for him/her is accurate?

I don't know the why's or the wherefore's, but as Blitz mentioned earlier, when we were checking bests HS earlier, people came up with a few different results, using quite a few different scripts. There's the map rank, then there score chart, a neat tool that Dako showed, and even andy has a nice app that shows the movements of scores. I'm concerned that you're using map rank as your be all and end all. We know that missing logs are one of the reasons that scores are inaccurate with it, but it's quite possible there are a number of other things that mess it up as well.
I for one am more likely to trust the score I've seen on someones profile then something that has been known to have had errors before, tho that is very much a fallible a solution.

[nagerous]

Map rank always tells me my score is higher than it is.

[InsomniaRed]

Map rank always tells me my score is higher than it is.

Shhhh just go with it

[josko.ri]

Map rank always tells me my score is higher than it is.

you have 20 missing logs (it can be checked in "summary" section in map rank), so it is not weird that for you it tells wrong.
I have zero missing logs and for me map rank always showed proper score.

so I know that map rank is not accurate, and reason for that is some missong logs from 2006/2007. does it mean that map rank IS accurate for players who has zero missing logs?

[Blitzaholic]

Map rank always tells me my score is higher than it is.

you have 20 missing logs (it can be checked in "summary" section in map rank), so it is not weird that for you it tells wrong.
I have zero missing logs and for me map rank always showed proper score.

so I know that map rank is not accurate, and reason for that is some missong logs from 2006/2007. does it mean that map rank IS accurate for players who has zero missing logs?

I would say that it is not 100% accurate for all players, but, it is a close ball park.

I don't know the why's or the wherefore's, but as Blitz mentioned earlier, when we were checking bests HS earlier, people came up with a few different results, using quite a few different scripts. There's the map rank, then there score chart, a neat tool that Dako showed, and even andy has a nice app that shows the movements of scores. I'm concerned that you're using map rank as your be all and end all. We know that missing logs are one of the reasons that scores are inaccurate with it, but it's quite possible there are a number of other things that mess it up as well.
I for one am more likely to trust the score I've seen on someones profile then something that has been known to have had errors before, tho that is very much a fallible a solution.

Leehar summed it well.

[josko.ri]

these high scores I have different than you, it is all high scores that I know from February which are not updated yet:

David Hoekstra 4369 (score in this moment)
Egel 3786
astompel 3776
josko.ri 3775
merida 3726 newcomer to the list
Crash_22 3659

[JOHNNYROCKET24]

Map rank has missing logs. This list I documented for years before turning it over to Blitz was accurate. I dont know what changes he has made since than, but it was perfect prior to that.

[Fruitcake]

Map rank has missing logs. This list I documented for years before turning it over to Blitz was accurate. I dont know what changes he has made since than, but it was perfect prior to that.

So the list has been changed in some way since you ran it JR?

[Blitzaholic]

There were a few differences in some points with a few players, not many, with differnent map ranks showing different highs. The last example was with thebest712 awhile back, but, jr had him at 5321, so I changed it as jr oversaw this, and, where that was the highest score recorded, I gave it to him. Same with DW, I had him a wince higher then jr did at that time, and gave him the higher. These scores are all accurate with jr's, the only ones that are not is the players who moved up in points and score since jr managed this.

NEW + UPDATED on updated 2-24-11

Only the first post to this thread will be edited and contain the up to date information. New high scores must be sent to me via PM with the proof that you have achieved it. A snapshot will be fine. Please do not just post " I had a 3956 ". This will not be accepted if I do not see it on the scoreboard.

I can be flexible with this, I'd rather not have my inbox flooded, but, a post in here, and some confirmation!



THE TOP 100 HIGHEST SCORES
"since the beginning of time"
(updated Feb. 24th, 2011)

CC's 5000 Point Club in color


1. King_Herpes 6351
2. Sjnap 6102
3. Karelpietertje 5969
4. Blitzaholic 5740
5. Scott-Land 5522

6. thebest712 5321
7. KingofGods 5211
8. Poo-Maker 5205
9. Demonfork 5158
10. Emmdizzle 5123
11. ljex 5117
12. SkyT 5075


13. Rabbiton 4981
14. bridge2far 4801
15. Mhennigan 4797
16. lt.pie 4787
17. RashidJelzin 4779
18. Thai Robert 4752
19. Velvecarrots 4660
20. ccatman 4596
21. Buizerd 4575
22. Malabrosse 4491
23. Prankcall 4456
24. pimphawks70 4430
25. Kiron 4420
26. Prismsaber 4383
27. Chariot of Fire 4380
28. General Mojo 4366
29. David Hoekstra 4354
30. Dustine 4310




31. Master Fenrir 4282
32. Comic Boy 4261
33. Gustaf Wasa 4251
33. Hesoos 4251
35. Skillerman 4198
36. Chephren 4168
36. xiangwang 4168
38. Laddida 4154
39. Timmy1 4136
40. Seulessliathan 4131
41. ahunda 4092
42. Thomas.Paine 4091
43. billy07 4070
44. Fantasianasian 4060
45. Aaarrrrggh 4049
46. dvlajko 4045
47. LFAW 4042
48. ballenus 4015
49. Loes 4008
50. Jboy 4007




51. ManBungalow 4003
52. Chao 4001
53. JOHNNYROCKET24 3969
54. Draq 3960
55. Fruitcake 3953
56. PJDH 3922
57. Rl_Orange 3919
58. jarrett155 3917
59. Big Whiskey 3868
59. Phlaim 3868
61. thezepman 3863
62. Yosevuk 3858
63. Phatscotty 3858
64. Gibbom 3838
65. FabledIntegral 3810
66. JustB 3807
67. Myrelock 3801
68. 3Asefa 3800
69. Maniacmath17 3785
70. eyestone 3771


71. astompel 3768
72. Egel 3766
73. Me-Da-MiNoRiTY 3765
74. dividedbyzero 3758
75. agonzos 3753
76. Teylen 3748
77. Naato 3735
78. Karlo Veliki 3734
79. Beadle 3731
80. Commander62890 3730
81. kumanovac 3724
82. Greatwhite 3720
82. jbeaver 3720
84. Bilbo 3719
85. David_Wain 3717
86. Mike Doherty 3712
87. josko.ri 3701
87. Gwaahjo 3701
89. Merz 3699
90. roadwarrior3697
91. Sam02 3697
92. Masli 3689
93. Dako 3687
94. merida 3668
95. wldearme 3667
96. BoganGod 3666
96. waseemalim 3666
98. AMGecko 3663
99. FarangDemon 3651
100. djt5483 3645



these are the players who are really close.


so close, yet so far!!!!!

GallantPellham 3630
Crash_22 3625
Torcav2 3625
Likemee 3616
jac99 3607
General K 3594
jpeter15 3591
SGUstickman 3591
Rodion 3586


/

Map rank has missing logs.

yes, we know this, but, thanks for confirming it.


updated

show

[josko.ri]

18 josko.ri 3760

[Blitzaholic]

18 josko.ri 3760

ok


thx



will add soon

[josko.ri]

3775 now

[josko.ri]

these high scores I have different than you, it is all high scores that I know from February which are not updated yet:

David Hoekstra 4369 (score in this moment)
Egel 3786
astompel 3776
josko.ri 3775
merida 3726 newcomer to the list
Crash_22 3659

[Blitzaholic]

these high scores I have different than you, it is all high scores that I know from February which are not updated yet:

David Hoekstra 4369 (score in this moment)
Egel 3786
astompel 3776
josko.ri 3775
merida 3726 newcomer to the list
Crash_22 3659

ok, thx josko.ri

[Rodion]

Josko has 3831.