Moderator: Community Team
BuckNasty00 wrote:Can we not leave ratings anymore?? or am I missing something
BuckNasty00 wrote:I dont think the old system cause I've only been playing 5 years . lol But usually it gave me the option to leave a rating (the 5 stars on the 3 areas) on my finished games. Even like had a reminder saying something like you can rate 3 players or whatever. I dont see any of it. I don't see any option to leave a rating for players. Maybe I'm in trouble.
xroads wrote:I see what he means.
Used to be you would goto finished games, and it would say you can leave ratings for 23 members and show you the games you could.
Now you have to go into each individual game to see if there are ratings to give.
xroads wrote:go into finished games
then enter the game you want to rate
then you can rate them at the bottom
Dukasaur wrote:xroads wrote:go into finished games
If I don't win the game, I figure I haven't earned the right to judge and don't rate anyone.
I adopted that self-imposed rule a while ago (maybe a year, maybe more) and it avoids the whole problem of going back into finished games and rating.
xroads wrote:Dukasaur wrote:xroads wrote:go into finished games
If I don't win the game, I figure I haven't earned the right to judge and don't rate anyone.
I adopted that self-imposed rule a while ago (maybe a year, maybe more) and it avoids the whole problem of going back into finished games and rating.
That is pretty dumb. What if you played a good game, but your opponent outplayed you. They dont deserve a high rating for beating you?
Dukasaur wrote:But considering the relatively low priority I put on ratings, I often just don't bother, except in extraordinary cases.
owenshooter wrote:Dukasaur wrote:But considering the relatively low priority I put on ratings, I often just don't bother, except in extraordinary cases.
ratings aren't nearly as useful or worthwhile as they were, when you could actually RATE people.. the new system is arbitrary and means very little...
consider that most people consider anything under a 4.5, APPALLING, an indication of how poorly the rating system works. the only thing that matters
to me is the percentage of turns taken... period...-Jésus noir
p.s.-the old rating system was an art unto itself... people took pride in the ratings they left/received... they actually meant something...
Dukasaur wrote:Yeah, the current rating system sucks. Nobody disagrees with that. Long overdue for an overhaul, but there's just so much else that needs to be done.
Positive For a Texan, he's not bad. Just kidding, lol. Plays a good game. Can't make mistakes against him and you need a lot of old fashioned luck. Plays solid and makes for interesting chat. Would gladly play more games with this player.
Positive Great sociological manipulator like myself. We had a fun time warring over who can get blue to attack who eh? Anyways, it was very close for a good part of the game. Great player. Hope to be on your side in a trio or duo match.
Positive complained that everyone was out to get him, talked some smack and then won the game. what more could you want in an opponent? well, how about one who executed a good plan of action from the beginning of the game and took advantage of some miscues and bad dice on the part of the other players? if so, that's owenshooter.
Neutral Deliberately dragged out the game. Here's all the proof you need: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... =6&t=52638 Compare the times he posted, both on the forum AND in the game chat. He could have very well just taken his turn right there.
owenshooter's response: show it. missing a turn is not grounds for a neg. i gained no strategic advantage by missing my turn, i was eliminated by the next player. *rolling my eyes*
Positive my new nemesis. i enjoyed slowly twisting my bayonette into his eye socket as he lay dying upon the heap of rotting flesh that was once his mighty army. he squirmed in agony and begged for mercy, and i gave no quarter. my team was truly lucky, and i know if he is given the chance of a rematch, he will be much crueler to me when he is the rightful victor, and i lay dying on his newly seized land...
Positive as i lay on the battlefield, my severed limbs still cluching my weapon in one hand, my mothers st. jude medallion in the other... the world seemed to begin to move in slow motion... the smoke began to settle, the blue sky, dotted with circling birds of prey, came through.. the sun shone down upon my soot covered face... and satisfied and content, i smiled... then Jan1976 stuck his boot on my throat, and slowly choked the life out of me...-0
Positive just kicked my teams ass. what else can i say? it is that simple. he kicked our collective ass.
BuckNasty00 wrote:ok just figured it out. God why does it have to be so difficult ??
BuckNasty00 wrote:Since no one fucking cares about us.
BuckNasty00 wrote:No need to get smart about it. I love how everyone defines CC. You work for them? Moderator or something?
My fucking point is that it was changed and it took me 3 days to figure it out. Why not leave alone. CC changes things for no fucking reason. Whats the sense. Usually makes things worse. But no one cares what I say. Its been crystal fucking clear about that. I pay for the premium. What a fucking con that was to get my money. I think i'll just leave finally. Take my 6 other friends who are premium members too. Since no one fucking cares about us.
haggismoffat wrote:Is it proper to rate someone you had no real dealing with. For example, I get knocked out and never really fight someone but I see them moving but due to fog I can't see exactly what they are doing. Should I give a 4 because what I saw was very good but not 5 star or not rate at all?
Gameplay: Measures the player's ability to play an enjoyable game (not the player's ability to win). Covers strategy, diplomacy, teamwork, etc...
Return to Conquer Club Discussion
Users browsing this forum: DumbleJum