A player wins one game in a campaign & wins all the credits?

by **macbone** on Thu Jun 25, 2015 10:31 am

The campaigns need a little tweaking.

I joined this campaign: http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... nt_id=2513

The campaign lasted three games, and three separate players won games. However, one player won all the credits. In this case, shouldn't the credits be split among the three winners?

by **Swifte** on Thu Jun 25, 2015 10:50 am

Those auto tournament tie-breakers get you every time... set up so that there has to be a winner.

Auto Tournament Tie Breakers wrote:1. Percentage of wins in the tournament as a whole
2. The cumulative number of Game rounds required to win the games they have won in the tournament (since the last point reset, or the start of the tournament if no point reset has occurred). Note: winning in less rounds is better.
3. The order in which the player joined the tournament (first player to join wins)

Winnings went to mikehayes 'cause he won in 6 rounds, the other games ended in 7.

by **macbone** on Thu Jun 25, 2015 11:21 am

Ah, gotcha, Swifte. Thanks for clearing that up, man. =)

Having been burned once, though, I'll know not to join any more campaigns with only 3 games. =)

by **Serbia** on Thu Jun 25, 2015 11:29 am

Swifte wrote:Those auto tournament tie-breakers get you every time... set up so that there has to be a winner.

Auto Tournament Tie Breakers wrote:1. Percentage of wins in the tournament as a whole
2. The cumulative number of Game rounds required to win the games they have won in the tournament (since the last point reset, or the start of the tournament if no point reset has occurred). Note: winning in less rounds is better.
3. The order in which the player joined the tournament (first player to join wins)

Winnings went to mikehayes 'cause he won in 6 rounds, the other games ended in 7.

What utter shite. There is no way I'd ever play in a tournament with such arbitrary tiebreakers.

Bollocks.