Moderator: Clan Directors
shoop76 wrote:Thanks guys. Now someone needs to get a war going. Maybe Fallen vs HH.
Keefie wrote:shoop76 wrote:Thanks guys. Now someone needs to get a war going. Maybe Fallen vs HH.
FOED vs Atlantis will start any day now and Gladiators of Noxious vs Tank Squad is due to start on 1st August.
shoop76 wrote:Keefie wrote:shoop76 wrote:Thanks guys. Now someone needs to get a war going. Maybe Fallen vs HH.
FOED vs Atlantis will start any day now and Gladiators of Noxious vs Tank Squad is due to start on 1st August.
You must have some inside info on the GON/ TS war because I can't find a thread anywhere. The FOED/ ATL 1v1 war will start within a day or 2 so no time for predictions.
IcePack wrote:shoop76 wrote:Keefie wrote:shoop76 wrote:Thanks guys. Now someone needs to get a war going. Maybe Fallen vs HH.
FOED vs Atlantis will start any day now and Gladiators of Noxious vs Tank Squad is due to start on 1st August.
You must have some inside info on the GON/ TS war because I can't find a thread anywhere. The FOED/ ATL 1v1 war will start within a day or 2 so no time for predictions.
viewtopic.php?f=441&t=213595
I love this and commend you for running it shoop. Well done bud.
I have a couple of questions for clarification. What do you mean by 3 bonus points for predicting the CC5 winner. You just want us to name the clan or provide a score too. Is there a place to make those predictions yet, or is that yet to come? I'm not quite sure I understand.
Also, is it important to make a unique prediction or can multiple people make the same prediction?
I have one concern that I hope can be addressed upfront, as I suspect applies to a lot of people. A lot of things like this come along and there is much interest up front and then as time goes by you miss a couple and fall behind and you feel like there is no point to play anymore anymore. In the end you have 5 diehards playing for the full year.
May I be so bold as to ask a couple of questions and make a couple of suggestions regarding this concern?
What type of notification will we have as new events are listed? Will I have to remember to keep checking the threads for new contests? Is it possible that a mass pm could be sent each time there is a new war/contest? My request sounds like a big venture on the surface, but I know that if you have all the names on a spreadsheet, then it's real simple to copy and paste the works into a pm address box. I'd be willing to offer assistance if needed.
Addressing this same issue, can we ensure that there is a significant "minimum" time for each event, i.e. if it's less than two weeks then you can't list it (preferably longer)?
Could we have a maximum number of events you can play? If you anticipate 100 wars in a year, then only allow participation in 80. Then there isn't such an incentive to simply quit, if you do miss a few.
Finally, one observation - I notice that when events similar to this are run for one month, they usually offer a GA medal. I would have expected that when the event is for a full year, that there would be several GA medals. There could be different categories to win, like most wins, most underdog wins, most scores dead on, etc. etc. restrictions could be in place to prevent one person from winning too many or even two for that matter. I suspect it would create a more exciting Scoreboard and more interest and I am not sure there is a downside. I appreciate that you don't want to hand those medals out like candy, but the opposite problem is no good either.
gigi_b wrote:Thanks for organizing this. It's a bit of extra fun on the side...
Regarding the scoring, if I understand it right, on a single prediction based on a clan war I could make up to 5 points if I guess the score right and the lower ranking clan wins. It would be 3 points for guessing the winner + 2 points for guessing the score right.
I can see that this rules have been in place for a while now, but I have to say that the "bonus" for guessing the right score is a bit low. I believe that's the difficult part. In fact, it's very difficult considering the fact that most wars have 40+ games!
Anyway, since it's been going like this for some time, I guess it will be hard to change the rules. But if you'd consider resetting the stats, at the end of some period that you'll decide, maybe it's worth revising this.
IcePack wrote:NEW Q3 ANNOUNCEMENT
Third Quarter Activity "Special" by shoop76 & the Clan Department
Bring a new friend in during the 3rd Quarter to participate can now bring you a few bonus points and help make up the difference!
- If your friend posts a prediction and names you as their referal (can't have participated in the event previously up til now) and makes minimum 3 predictions this quarter, you'll get +1 bonus! (Max 5)
- If your friend posts at least 50% of the available predictions, you'll receive an extra bonus point on top of the original one (Max 5)
- If your friend continues participating thru Quarter 4 (minimum 50% of all Q3 and Q4 predictions available) then you & your friend will each receive +1 bonus point (Max 5)
Remember, every quarter has its own set of prizes so even if you are "out of the running" for the year long competition, there are still plenty of credits & prizes to be won! And by getting your friends to participate, you can boost your chances at the year long competition.
1 point if you predict the score and miss by 1
gigi_b wrote:Just had an idea about the scoring system after seeing some results and I want to write a bit about the last rule of scoring which is1 point if you predict the score and miss by 1
Fist of all you can't miss by one score-wise; the minimum miss is by 2. And that miss could go both ways. You can predict, for clan A versus B that had a war which actually ended up with the score a to b, either a+1 to b-1, either a-1 to b+1.
Now regarding that, I believe that there would be much more of a "point" rewarding users for the most "tight" miss of the two. What I mean is this (and I'll give the example with numbers to be easier to follow):
- actual score of war A vs B: 25-16
- I'd propose to give the 1 point to users that predicted 24-17 rather than to users that predicted 26-15
Why? Well becasue what you reward here is predicting the nearest/smallest difference, actually, and that happens when the score is more tight, not loose. And second, you get a bit of an ease when counting scores...
gigi_b wrote:Sure, I wasn't suggesting any change in this edition. And ..yeah...it's up to you if you find it good or bad.
About participation, I believe that the time span for the contest is what lowers the participation rate. People are more fond of results that they can see right away. So don't know....some per round prizes maybe would be enticing..
Users browsing this forum: No registered users