Close Please
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 6:26 amAny clan interested in a Doubles war for March? ... We will battle anyone 
All negotiable.
All negotiable.
2. Why only Doubles?
8. Do you mean no 'no forts'?
13. That's a horrible tie-breaker.
Conquer Club
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://rc.conquerclub.com/forum/
Close Please
https://rc.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=443&t=202655
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 6:26 amRe: FIRE and DICE need a March battle
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:01 pmRe: FIRE and DICE need a March battle
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:25 pmiAmCaffeine wrote:2. Why only Doubles?
8. Do you mean no 'no forts'?
13. That's a horrible tie-breaker.
Why would he mean "no forts" in one that clearly states two different kinds of spoils in it..?
Re: FIRE and DICE need a March battle
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:39 pmGabriel13 wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:2. Why only Doubles?
8. Do you mean no 'no forts'?
13. That's a horrible tie-breaker.
Why would he mean "no forts" in one that clearly states two different kinds of spoils in it..?
Makes more sense than no spoils.
Re: FIRE and DICE need a March battle
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 4:29 amiAmCaffeine wrote:2. Why only Doubles? - Because it is quick and different
8. Do you mean no 'no forts'? - yes changed to #6....my mistake there
13. That's a horrible tie-breaker. - it has been played before
Razorvich wrote:All negotiable.
Re: FIRE and DICE need a March battle
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2014 4:58 amSweet. Just curious. 
Re: FIRE and DICE need a March battle
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:06 amPlease Close